ad banner for FDA Blunder and Coverup Kills Millions
Advertising Email FAQ Home RSS Search Speaking Townhall YouTube
Kneecapping Barack Obama at every opportunity.
« | Main | »
December 11, 2009
Melissa Clouthier Sarah Palin Hits ‘Em Where It Hurts–Updated: Jon Stewart Feels Frum’s Pain
  (Read WP posts from Melissa Clouthier) | (Read MT posts from Melissa Clouthier) | rss

20080829-233739-pic-575956262_t600


Could there be anything worse for President Barack Obama than his nemesis agreeing with him? I don't think so. From CNN:
Sarah Palin had some rare praise Thursday for President Obama after the president delivered his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech in Oslo. But the former Republican vice presidential nominee added that she would like to see the president act more like his predecessor, George W. Bush.

"I liked what he said," Palin told USAToday in an interview after the speech.

Palin said the president's remarks had a familiar ring. "I thumbed through my book quickly this morning to say 'Wow! That really sounded familiar.' because I talked in book too about the fallen nature of man and why war is necessary at times."

But Palin suggested Obama could learn a few things from former President Bush.

"We have to stop those terrorists over there," she told the paper. "We've learned our lesson from 9/11. George Bush did a great job of reminding Americans every single day that he was in office what that lesson is. And, by the way, I'd like to see President Obama follow more closely in the footsteps of George Bush and [Bush's] passion keeping the homeland safe, his passion for respecting – honoring our troops."

Well, then. If Sarah approves....David Frum must disapprove:
When Barack Obama got word of the prize in October, he said he would accept “as an affirmation of American leadership.” But in Oslo he did not speak as leader of all America, but as leader of a party – and as a party leader who cannot refrain from snide insituations against the motives – not only of his opposite-party predecessors – but of all who worked with them, including the leaders of many allied governments.

So, on the substance, President Obama was refreshingly "realistic". On style, he was still a "graceless", long-winded bore.

Well, you can't have it all.

P.S. Can anyone disagree with the statement? Sarah Palin is the opposing voice to President Barack Obama. Or this? She is gutsy.

UPDATED:

Via Newsbusters

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Obama's Nobel Speech
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealth Care Crisis
Facebook MySpace Twitter del.icio.us Digg Newsvine Propeller Reddit Stumbleupon Technorati
    Share this article!
I like! I don't like. Score: 15
Return to Top  Melissa Clouthier | 8:27 am | Permalink Comments (View Comments)   Email this!  
Note: Comments and Trackbacks for this entry were closed as of December 18, 2009
  • arthur_branch
    I wouldn't take Jack's statements to personally. The typical liberal response to someone they fear is to call them stupid. Just look at GWB. For years they called him stupid and at the same time claimed he was behind everything from 9/11 to hurricanes to global warming. With GWB out of office Palin is taking his place as the liberal's boggeyman.
    Posted by batgeek
    2009-12-12 07:48:13


    Not to mention Reagan, H.W. Bush, Newt, etc.
  • batgeek
    I wouldn't take Jack's statements to personally. The typical liberal response to someone they fear is to call them stupid. Just look at GWB. For years they called him stupid and at the same time claimed he was behind everything from 9/11 to hurricanes to global warming. With GWB out of office Palin is taking his place as the liberal's boggeyman.
  • RWDavidD
    "P.S. Can anyone disagree with the statement? Sarah Palin is the opposing voice to President Barack Obama. Or this? She is gutsy."

    People can disagree with these statements, but they would be w-r-o-n-g. Sarah Palin is the voice of the Republican party; Sarah Palin is the voice of conservatism in America; Sarah Palin is the last great hope for the future of this country.
  • She's not stupid and no one said she is.

    Savvy is the word. But certmainly not an intellectual heavyweight by any stretch of the imagination.


    Can't recall anyone calling her an intellectual heavyweight.

    Of course nobody's ever said she's missing anything intellectually...and then gone on to support it with fact. Ever notice that? It's all just "that's the way I feel about her."
  • Posted by Robert_Ingersoll
    2009-12-11 13:51:04

    Did you have a statement or something, or are you drive bying like your buttock buddy Jack?
  • Did Sarah Palin actually finish something?
    Posted by Robert_Ingersoll
    2009-12-11 13:51:04

    yup a term or two a Mayor, a term or 2 on the city council, a presidential campaign... Should I go on retard?
  • TheBaud
    Savvy is the word. But certmainly not an intellectual heavyweight by any stretch of the imagination.
    Posted by Jack Schite 2009-12-11 13:39:23


    Since the average houseplant is your intellectual superior, I will take your condemnation of Palin's intelligence for what it is worth, that being NOTHING!
  • Jack Schite
    Certainly.
  • Jack Schite
    She's not stupid and no one said she is.

    Savvy is the word. But certmainly not an intellectual heavyweight by any stretch of the imagination.
  • Posted by Jack Schite
    2009-12-11 11:34:57

    Fear. It's what's for breakfast.
  • TheBaud
    Posted by Jack Schite 2009-12-11 11:34:57

    Do you think it is a good idea to continue to impune the intelligence of Sarah Palin and call her stupid, when she continues to run rings around your party leadership and expose them for the simpering idiots that they are?

    Apparently you do!
  • Jack Schite
    Nemesis? Please. You give this intellectually lightweight lady way more credit and attention than she warrants.

    But she's all you have. :)
blog comments powered by Disqus

ad banner for FDA Blunder and Coverup Kills Millions! (Bottom)
© Copyright 2001-2010 John Hawkins
eXTReMe Tracker