ad banner for FDA Blunder and Coverup Kills Millions
Advertising Email FAQ Home RSS Search Speaking Townhall YouTube
Kneecapping Barack Obama at every opportunity.
« | Main | »
May 19, 2010
John Hawkins A Short Obligatory Election Round-Up Of Yesterday’s Key Races
  (Read WP posts from John Hawkins) | (Read MT posts from John Hawkins) | rss

Yesterday, there were a few key primaries from around the country. Here's a round-up:

* Former Murtha aide Mark Critz handily beat Republican Tim Burns in a special election to fill Murtha's seat. The final numbers look to be 52%-to-45%. That spread is a bit of a surprise because the polling looked like a toss-up going in and motivation seemed to be with the Burns voters.

There will be a lot of talk about what this loss means for the GOP, but it's far from a typical district. On the one hand, McCain did win the district in the last election. On the other hand, there's also a 2-to-1 Democratic registration advantage. On the other hand, these are fairly conservative Democrats who aren't particularly fond of a left-wing agenda. On the other hand, the fact that the Democrats had a competitive primary between Specter and Sestak may have given Critz a big turnout boost that helped his chances. Wow, that's a lot of hands!

Long story short, it's definitely a disappointing loss for Republicans because it would have been devastating to the Democrats to lose a seat that John Murtha held for nearly forty years. Happily, Burns will get another crack at  it  in November. Let's hope he gets   over the goal line next time around.

* When it became clear that he was going to be in a lot of trouble in his primary election against Pat Toomey, Arlen Specter switched parties. Here's what I wrote about that over a year ago, back on May 9, 2009:

Who would win in a Sestak vs. Specter primary? It would depend on how well financed Sestak would be (my guess is very) and how much support Specter would get from the Democratic Establishment (my guess is relatively little). If I had to lay odds, I'd bet on Sestak, who would probably get ferocious support from the activist Left.
At the end of the day, despite getting some weak support from Barack Obama, just as I predicted a year ago, Specter was defeated by Sestak 54%-46%. A man like Specter, who doesn't believe in anything other than keeping his job richly deserved to lose.

Although some people think the stronger candidate went down, I'm not so sure. I'd honestly rather  see  a Toomey vs. Specter match-up in November because it would   fire  up Republicans and demoralize  Democrats. Toomey vs. Sestak will probably be a tough fight, although Toomey is in a great position to win it.

* As expected, in Kentucky, Ron Paul's "Libertarianish" son Rand knocked off establishment Republican Trey Grayson. Guess being the protege of the ultimate establishment Republican, Mitch McConnell, wasn't very helpful for Grayson in anti-establishment year. Paul, whom  I supported over Grayson, is a fiscally conservative diehard, although he's not that impressive on foreign policy issues. He'll be facing Democrat Jack Conway, who just nosed out Lt. Gov. Dan Mongiardo. It should be a competitive race, but one that Paul should win if he runs a smart campaign. The winner will get Jim Bunning's seat.

* In Arkansas, Democratic Senator Blanche Lincoln edged out Lt. Gov. Bill Halter 45%-43%, but that wasn't enough to avoid a run-off. That means three more weeks of campaigning before Lincoln and Halter go at it again for the nomination. This is almost a lose/lose situation for Democrats because Lincoln is already extremely unpopular in Arkansas and Halter is widely considered to be too liberal to win the state. Since they're already in such a dire situation, fighting it out in a primary a little longer is likely to make the situation even worse.
Facebook MySpace Twitter del.icio.us Digg Newsvine Propeller Reddit Stumbleupon Technorati
    Share this article!
I like! I don't like. Score: 3
Return to Top  John Hawkins | 8:47 am | Permalink Comments (View Comments)   Email this!  
Note: Comments and Trackbacks for this entry were closed as of May 26, 2010
  • D-Vega
    This is a message to incumbents that their time is up. Which I am fine with. I don't care if its Dems or Reps. Clear them all out and elect new blood.
  • Mr. EMT
    I was just glancing at a website that detailed what party's have been in power over the years...
    Funnily enough republicans have historically not held power that often... looked like 70% of the time democrats have been running the country over the last century. Chart shows who has been in power in increments of 2 years since 1945
    22 democrat Vs 18 GOP (presidents)
    23 d Vs 10 GOP (senates)
    26 d Vs 7 (house)

    Value: 1 = two years of power.

    Other notes:

    Democrats have enjoyed over 22 years of power over all three branches,
    GOP has had 4 years.


    Seriously it's a little... no its way past time to throw democrats under the bus, take back the constitution, take back our economy and national defense and stop letting these little commie bastards destroy our nation.


    http://uspolitics.about.com/od/usgovernment/l/bl_party_division_2.htm
  • baoxian
    An ideal outcome except for Burns. Spectre may have been more vulnerable at the state level, but seeing an incumbent Democrat go down is far more valuable in the grand scheme of the election. Now he'll be a sore reminder of how badly the establishment has failed every day from now until January 2011.

    Rand Paul is a huge slap in the face of the GOP leadership, and will hopefully finally convince them to follow the small government/Tea Party wing of the party over the failed RINO establishment.
  • President Friedman
    I haven't followed Rand Paul very closely, but man... The son of Ron Paul and named after Ayn Rand. It's like he is a libertarian comic book hero. He shoudl campaign with a cape and a dollar sign emblem on his chest!
  • Power_System_Oper
    Long story short. When conservatives start throwing establishment Repbulicans back under their own bus and get behind the Libertarian minded candidates,we win. When we remain timid and continue to fall for the establishment Republican propoganda which says we must support their candidate who can win...we lose either way. Either the liberal Democrat wins or the establishment Republican wins and then proceeds to throw conservatives under the bus.

    Congratulations Rand Paul. Happy days are here again my fellow Libertarians. Our day has arrived.

  • TheDickNixon
    Yet you endorsed Barak Obama and said you were voting for him in November 2008. Nixon is flagging your post for lying.
  • dougschexnayderphdret
    MEDIA LATEST LIE: PENN. ELECTION RESULTS
    In a state where registered democrats have a 2-1 edge a democrat won with 53% against a Republican so the lib-media is gleeful.
    Guess what?
    The dem ran on this: pro life, pro gun, pro nuke power, anti-tax and anti-Obama care. Is this the modern democrat agenda?
    Is the democrat (once again like Obama) lying thru his teeth to get elected?
    At ANY rate, he did NOT run on the Obama agenda and he DID run on a conservative agenda.
    Obama-ism LOST.
    Anything you hear to the contrary is simply wrong.

    http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish
  • D-Vega
    You are full of it, crapfish.

    Not only is Sestak Pro-choice, but he received an "F" from the NRA three years in a row, is renewable energy-supportive, voted for the Healthcare Reform Bill and is no more against taxes than most politicians.

    Your spin won't work here. A liberal Democrat beat a former-Republican, and will be beat Toomey.
  • Toastrider
    Huh? Crawfish is talking about Critz, not Sestak.

    Are you commenting while stoned again, Vega?
  • D-Vega
    You are correct, Toastrider. My mistake.
  • Mr. EMT
    Ah, well thanks for pointing out another commie elected.
    Send the traitor to jail.
  • D-Vega
    It must hurt to be that stupid.
  • D-Vega
  • Mr. EMT
    However, i do see how he won, not by his platform, but by trashing Spector lol.
    Now we see how he does against Toomey.
  • D-Vega
    He'll eat toomey for breakfast.
blog comments powered by Disqus

ad banner for FDA Blunder and Coverup Kills Millions! (Bottom)
© Copyright 2001-2010 John Hawkins
eXTReMe Tracker