In Defense of Dan Riehl…


Here’s the deal. Dan wrote a: post about Harry Ried that has lefty panties in a wad. What did he say?

I’m not sure I quite understand this, given that cost is so important as a burden to taxpayers when it comes to: health care. If: Democrats want so badly to abort babies because of it, why are we bothering with: someone who has a broken neck and back at 69? It sounds to me like she’s pretty well used up and has probably been living off the taxpayers for plenty of years: to begin with. Aren’t we at least going to get a vote on it?

I realize her crook of a husband and his pals in Congress have excluded themselves from the mess they’re going to compel everyone else to join, but we’re still paying the: bills, are we not? I don’t see that she’s worth it at this point, frankly. I can’t recall her ever doing anything for me.

Come on, Harry – do your civic duty. The nation’s broke and counting on you guy. Pull the plug and get back: to work. And: don’t bill us for a full day today, either. This is no time to be sloughing off. Air freight her home, you can bury her during recess on your own time and dime. Or are you going to bill us for that, too?

Clearly, this is satire. Dan’s a snarky bastard, and he is ruthless about the truth – both qualities I sincerely appreciate. The language of the post is meant to draw attention to the hypocrisy of the left, and highlight the callousness of Democratic leadership in light of Stupak’s: statements. The attitude that life is an obstacle for their proposed health care program is nauseating at best, and rightly pissed a lot of people off this week.

The thing is, this isn’t a new attitude. This has been Democratic attitude for a long time – it’s become life vs. their health care takeover. Pregnancies and new people are an inconvenience when you’ve decided it’s your duty to control all of them.: Remember last year when Pelosi said that birth control was the best economic stimulus?

PELOSI: Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those – one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.

Dan pointed out the hypocrisy of their stance, and the nasty motivation behind it… so effectively that he’s being torched by anyone: and everyone. Apparently the “vile” nature of the post: hit home for some…

Well done, Dan.


Tags assigned to this article:
Dan RiehlHarry RiedNancy Pelosi

Related Articles

16

San Francisco Pro-Life Rally Draws 40,000 Marchers to Protest Roe v. Wade

Last year, 35,000 people braved stark, raving San Francisco loonies IN THE RAIN to march for life. This year, with

0

Only Two More Years Until My Optimum Abortion Time!

by: Liz Thatcher Jezebel may have outdone themselves this time. In a Feb. 6 blog titled “What’s the Best Age to

13

Planned Parenthood Pushes Sexualization of Ten-Year-Olds

One indication that moonbattery is not just misguided but evil is that progressives have an obsession with corrupting children. This