For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Twin Boys Butchered for Not Being Girls
Written By : Dave Blount

“Safe, legal, and rare,” the moonbats bleat, reading off their bumper stickers. Yet this is where abortion leads:

This couple are so desperate for a baby girl that they terminated twin boys and are fighting to choose the sex of their next child.

The couple, who have three sons and still grieve for a daughter they lost soon after birth, are going to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal to win the right to select sex by IVF [in vitro fertilization] treatment. …

So determined are the couple to have a girl that they recently terminated twin boys conceived through IVF.

“Terminated” is mealy-mouthed liberalspeak for “murdered in the womb.”

Modern science allows us to know ever more about children before they are born. Already we can kill them for being boys. Soon we may be able to kill them for their eye color, or for being left-handed, or for having a birthmark.

In a progressive utopia, everything that is not mandatory is forbidden, so there may come to be laws demanding that certain undesirable features mark babies for death. Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren has already floated the idea of forced abortions.

Once you set off down an evil road, you can be sure to reach an evil destination.

On a tip from Aussie-John. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

0
  • Anonymous

    In a progressive utopia, everything that is not mandatory is forbidden, so there may come to be laws demanding that certain undesirable features mark babies for death.

    There’s my daily dose of VH batshit crazy-ness.

    • Anonymous

      You mean daily dose of common sense. I know you never get your recommended daily value when you don’t stop by RWN.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve read that in the US the preference is strongly for girls when the parents can choose the sex. I wonder what changed in our culture to make females preferable to males unlike most every other country (China and India spring to mind).

    Not that there is anything wrong with wanted a daughter, I just wonder why the shift occurred.

    • Pratcrat

      haven’t you heard? Men are evil pigs. Women are sainted geniuses who will save the universe from evil men.

  • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

    I wonder who those two murdered boys might have been.

    • StanW

      One of them would have been the statesman that brought peace to the Middle East. The other would have been the reasearch scientist that cured AIDS. Their children would have been doctors and politicians and many wonderful people.

      But they were inconvenient and had to be killed to spare them of this desparate life!

      • Mahatma

        Or they both could have turned out like you stanley.

        • StanW

          And I’ll bet you think that alone warrent their death, don;t you Vega?

  • Whomever I Choose to Be

    “Terminated” is mealy-mouthed liberalspeak for “murdered in the womb.”

    Just as “Pro-Life” is fascist-speak for “Tyrranous Control of Other People’s Rights”

    « The President’s Speech in Arizona | Main | Rep. Peter King Attempts to Exploit Tucson Shootings With Nonsensical Gun Restrictions »
    January 13, 2011
    Twin Boys Butchered for Not Being Girls
    (Read WP posts from Van Helsing) | (Read MT posts from Van Helsing) | rss
    “Safe, legal, and rare,” the moonbats bleat, reading off their bumper stickers. Yet this is where abortion leads:

    This couple are so desperate for a baby girl that they terminated twin boys and are fighting to choose the sex of their next child.

    The couple, who have three sons and still grieve for a daughter they lost soon after birth, are going to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal to win the right to select sex by IVF [in vitro fertilization] treatment. …

    So determined are the couple to have a girl that they recently terminated twin boys conceived through IVF.

    “Terminated” is mealy-mouthed liberalspeak for “murdered in the womb.”

    Modern science allows us to know ever more about children before they are born. Already we can kill them for being boys. Soon we may be able to kill them for their eye color, or for being left-handed, or for having a birthmark.

    In a progressive utopia, everything that is not mandatory is forbidden, so there may come to be laws demanding that certain undesirable features mark babies for death. Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren has already floated the idea of forced abortions.

    Once you set off down an evil road, you can be sure to reach an evil destination.

    On a tip from Aussie-John. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

    Share this article!
    Score: 1 Return to Top Van Helsing | 2:02 pm | (View Comments) Note: Comments and Trackbacks for this entry will be closed after January 20, 2011

    Like Dislike Community Disqus Login options

    About Disqus

    Glad you liked it. Would you like to share?
    Facebook

    Twitter

    Share
    No thanks
    Sharing this page …

    Thanks! Close

    Add New Comment

    Post as …
    Showing 4 comments
    Sort by Popular now Best rating Newest first Oldest first Subscribe by email Subscribe by RSS
    CavalierX 40 minutes ago

    I wonder who those two murdered boys might have been.

    Considering the caliber of their parents, I’d say Adolf or Tojo.

    • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

      Besides the rest of your jumbled post, this caught my eye:

      “Just as “Pro-Life” is fascist-speak for “Tyrranous Control of Other People’s Rights”"

      No pro-life is compassionate phrasing for protecting the life of the child that the mother chose to get pregnant with. And not letting her rights trump the rights of the child she bears.

      If you don’t like that, tough shit.

      • Mahatma

        I don’t. I don’t think you have the right to comment unless you are a woman. Which you might well be. In that case, never mind.

        • aegean

          Okay, I’m a woman. My rights do not trump those of any and all future children that might grow within me. How’s that?

        • StanW

          When a women can get pregnant all by herself, then only she can have an opinion. No matter how much you choose to be stiupid, there is a father involved here, who has a right to what happenes to their child.

        • Mediumheadboy

          ” I don’t think…”

          You could’ve stopped right there.

        • Edwardperkins

          Mahatma, you say “unless you are a woman you don’t have the right to comment”. Well men what do you say? My moma told me it takes “two to tangle” and asserted both are equally responsible. Mahatma you can’t do it with a man but once you have done it then the man is out of the picture? Wow, what logic, what ethics, what evil.

        • Azcat85

          Bull shit. A women does not have a right to murder another for personal pleasure. This will never be recognized no matter what slanted SC says so!

    • StanW

      Just as “Pro-Life” is fascist-speak for “Tyrranous Control of Other People’s Rights”

      Pro-Life means standing up for the rights of people to be allowed to be born and live their lives.

      Women have the right to their own bodies, no question there. But when there is another unique person in question, one persons right to life does not automatically supercede the other.

      • Don_cos

        Women have the right to their own bodies, no question there. But when there is another unique person in question, one persons right to life does not automatically supercede the other.

        A woman should exercise her right to keep her legs shut if she doesn’t want to risk pregnancy.

        • Soldout

          Absolutely. The man has no input into the situation.

          • Don_cos

            That’s right, he has no say in the murder of his child.

          • Azcat85

            I woman pregnant with my child decided to get an abortion, I would pursue murder charges all the way to the supreme court. it is about time more men did the same thing!

    • Anonymous

      So… the right of the child to be born and have a full life is somehow NOT considered?

      And don’t give me that crap about “it’s not a child yet”. That’s just an excuse by people who want to screw and not have to deal with the consequences.

    • Wiff O’Grapeshot

      You choose to be a babbling loonie?

      That has to be the most incoherant screed I’ve seen here yet.

      • Toastrider

        Yeah, that was pretty impressive even by RWN troll standards.

  • MirabileAuditu

    *Feminists*, who, by the way, are generally not the least bit feminine, love to rant that men should have no say in whether or not unborn infants are butchered. Thus *feminists* disregard the fact that the infant, whose very life teeters at the whim of the woman carrying it has half the DNA of its father. Moreover, the father may be financially and emotionally capable of raising his child, but his wishes are legally irrelevant, to hear *feminists* and other liberals talk. Then there’s the subject of child support – 18 years of it. Sorry dad, shut up. Your opinions mean nothing, zero, nada. A picture being worth a thousand words…. http://abortionno.org/Resources/pictures_3.html

  • LouiseCA

    This is horrifying and heartbreaking. We are becoming less than animals.

  • LouiseCA

    This is horrifying and heartbreaking. We are becoming less than animals.

  • http://WWW.SPIRITOFAMERICAPARTYRADIOSHOW.COM TOM P O’DONNELL

    In most states, first-degree murder is defined as an unlawful killing that is both willful and premeditated, meaning that it was committed after planning or “lying in wait” for the victim.

    TO ME ABORTION MEETS THE DESCRIPTION OF MURDER ONE.

    Second-degree murder is ordinarily defined as 1) an intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned, nor committed in a reasonable “heat of passion” or 2) a killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender’s obvious lack of concern for human life. Second-degree murder may best be viewed as the middle ground between first-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter.

    SURELY THERE ARE EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES.PRESERVING THE LIFE OF THE MOTHER IS A MAJOR FACTOR. WHEN ONLY ONE HUMAN BEING CAN BE SAVED. THIS HAPPENS ONLY IN ONE PERCENT OF ABORTIONS INCLUDING INCEST..

    VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER
    The unlawful killing of a human being without malice or premeditation, either express or implied; distinguished from murder, which requires malicious intent.

    SEXUAL SELECTION IS A SIDE EFFECT OF ABORTION. THE POW (PRISONER OF THE WOMB) IS A GIRL AND THE PARENTS WANTED A BOY.

    KILL THE GIRL AND WE WILL TRY AGAIN.

    A CHILD OF INCONVENIENCE OR A FORM OF BIRTH CONTROL IS A GREATER PROPORTION. FULL TERM ABORTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS OF CRIMES. HERE THE CHILD IS PULLED APART LIMB FROM LIMB AFTER HAVING THE BOY OR GIRL’S HEAD CRUSHED AND SPINE SNAPPED.

    At law, an accomplice is a person who actively participates in the commission of a crime, even though they take no part in the actual criminal offense.

    IN THE NUREMBERG TRIALS OF 1945 DOCTORS, GENERALS, BUSINESSMEN, POLITICIANS AND JUDGES RECEIVED THE DEATH PENALTY BECAUSE THEY WERE ACCOMPLICES TO MURDER.

    IN AMERICA TODAY 3,500 AMERICAN BABIES WILL BE EXECUTED AND BY THE END OF 2011 ONE MILLION TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND BOYS AND GIRLS OF ALL COLORS WILL BE EXTERMINATED AND LABELED A SOCIAL LIABILITY. IN THE LAST SIX YEARS WE BEAT HITLER’S FINAL SOLUTION.

    STALIN SAID ON THE EVE OF INVADING BERLIN THAT NO RUSSIAN WOULD BE TRIED FOR ANY CRIME AGAINST ANY GERMAN.

    HE ALSO SAID THE ONLY INNOCENT GERMAN IS THE UNBORN. WE KILL THE UNBORN. NO RIGHT TO A TRIAL NO CITIZENSHIP PROTECTION FOR THE HELPLESS.THIS IN A LAND WHERE THE GREATEST GENERATION DIED ALL OVER THE WORLD TO PROTECT THE WEAK AND HELPLESS.

    IN A DEMOCRACY, WHEN THE MAJORITY COMMITS MURDER. MURDER WILL BE THE LAW OF THE LAND. SAME RULE APPLIES TO DRUGS

    http://WWW.SPIRITOFAMERICAPARTYRADIOSHOW.COM

  • http://WWW.SPIRITOFAMERICAPARTYRADIOSHOW.COM TOM P O’DONNELL

    In most states, first-degree murder is defined as an unlawful killing that is both willful and premeditated, meaning that it was committed after planning or “lying in wait” for the victim.

    TO ME ABORTION MEETS THE DESCRIPTION OF MURDER ONE.

    Second-degree murder is ordinarily defined as 1) an intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned, nor committed in a reasonable “heat of passion” or 2) a killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender’s obvious lack of concern for human life. Second-degree murder may best be viewed as the middle ground between first-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter.

    SURELY THERE ARE EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES.PRESERVING THE LIFE OF THE MOTHER IS A MAJOR FACTOR. WHEN ONLY ONE HUMAN BEING CAN BE SAVED. THIS HAPPENS ONLY IN ONE PERCENT OF ABORTIONS INCLUDING INCEST..

    VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER
    The unlawful killing of a human being without malice or premeditation, either express or implied; distinguished from murder, which requires malicious intent.

    SEXUAL SELECTION IS A SIDE EFFECT OF ABORTION. THE POW (PRISONER OF THE WOMB) IS A GIRL AND THE PARENTS WANTED A BOY.

    KILL THE GIRL AND WE WILL TRY AGAIN.

    A CHILD OF INCONVENIENCE OR A FORM OF BIRTH CONTROL IS A GREATER PROPORTION. FULL TERM ABORTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS OF CRIMES. HERE THE CHILD IS PULLED APART LIMB FROM LIMB AFTER HAVING THE BOY OR GIRL’S HEAD CRUSHED AND SPINE SNAPPED.

    At law, an accomplice is a person who actively participates in the commission of a crime, even though they take no part in the actual criminal offense.

    IN THE NUREMBERG TRIALS OF 1945 DOCTORS, GENERALS, BUSINESSMEN, POLITICIANS AND JUDGES RECEIVED THE DEATH PENALTY BECAUSE THEY WERE ACCOMPLICES TO MURDER.

    IN AMERICA TODAY 3,500 AMERICAN BABIES WILL BE EXECUTED AND BY THE END OF 2011 ONE MILLION TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND BOYS AND GIRLS OF ALL COLORS WILL BE EXTERMINATED AND LABELED A SOCIAL LIABILITY. IN THE LAST SIX YEARS WE BEAT HITLER’S FINAL SOLUTION.

    STALIN SAID ON THE EVE OF INVADING BERLIN THAT NO RUSSIAN WOULD BE TRIED FOR ANY CRIME AGAINST ANY GERMAN.

    HE ALSO SAID THE ONLY INNOCENT GERMAN IS THE UNBORN. WE KILL THE UNBORN. NO RIGHT TO A TRIAL NO CITIZENSHIP PROTECTION FOR THE HELPLESS.THIS IN A LAND WHERE THE GREATEST GENERATION DIED ALL OVER THE WORLD TO PROTECT THE WEAK AND HELPLESS.

    IN A DEMOCRACY, WHEN THE MAJORITY COMMITS MURDER. MURDER WILL BE THE LAW OF THE LAND. SAME RULE APPLIES TO DRUGS

    http://WWW.SPIRITOFAMERICAPARTYRADIOSHOW.COM

  • yellowhorse

    My God in Heaven! What has this country become? Since abortion became legal, we as a nation have slaughtered 55 million babies. And a majority of them were black. That is approaching the population of Great Britain. What is wrong with this country. If the father has been given no say, will the one responsible for the abortion, stand judgement for the slaughter/slaughter?

  • Mary

    I wonder how they will explain to ALMIGHTY GOD why they threw his gift back at him! Babies are a precious gift! Your babies will be waving to you as you depart HEAVEN for HELL!!!

  • http://www.neckbackpainrelief.org Joint pain relief

    wow, this one is good, gonna use for another sport but i think it’ll be just as good, BIG thanks :)
    Welcome to my blog : Joint pain relief

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info