For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Another 1,000,000 Guns Sold…Last Month
Written By : Duane Lester

The gun industry is in no need of stimulus. So far this year, over 9 million guns have been sold in America and over a million were sold just last month:

Data released by the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) reported 1,074,757 checks in August 2009, a 12.3 percent increase from the 956,872 reported in August 2008.

So far that is roughly 9,076,205 gun bought this year!

Gun ShowIf you think nine million guns sold in eight months is unreal, consider this: NCIS background checks can cover the purchase of more than one gun at a time. It’s possible that a person picks out two or three guns, but only gets one background check, meaning there’s a good chance the real number of firearms purchased is over ten million.

So what are people buying?

The bulk of the buying has been concentrated on the following types of guns or calibers:

  • Semi Auto Handguns
  • Revolvers
  • Ar15s and all variants of the Black Rifle
  • .50 Caliber

According to the article, there are an estimated 355 million guns in America, or 1.17 guns per person. Some call that dangerous and scary.

I call it a good start.

Hat Tip: Instapundit

Photo Credit: Michael (mt5tx)

Cross posted from All American Blogger.

0
  • Mike_M

    I'll provide a quick translation on the statistics: people are buying guns for home and personal defense. Nothing on that list is a hunting weapon.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    So that explains why so many liberals are hiding under their sheets.

  • D-Vega

    Looks like the fear-mongering is working.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    Looks like the fear-mongering is working.

    Vega, do you have a clue who Cass Sunstein is? They're trying to shove his confirmation through the Senate while everyone's distracted by the health care takeover. Sunstein wants to ban not just guns, but hunting as well. His job is to alter regulations to achieve an end — the way it's perfectly legal to buy a gun in NYC, but try to actually accomplish it against the mountain of regulations you have to work through and fees you have to pay. Sunstein agrees with Warren Burger's statement that "the Second Amendment doesn't

    guarantee the right to have firearms at all."
    http://tinyurl.com/njl6zg

  • tblrk2006

    Looks like the fear-mongering is working.

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-09-09 09:43:30

    Why should we not be afraid? In your world obama is not a gun grabber?

  • D-Vega

    That's an impressive indictment, Cav.

    While I agree with Sunstein on some issues, on others I don't.

    I don't think the majority of what he says is radical, though.

    I also think that this guy is not going to be a judge, or a legislator. And the recent SCOTUS decision on the 2nd has been a dramatic move.

    Lastly, "shoving" a confirmation through is what the Dems are supposed to do.

    Why should we not be afraid? In your world obama is not a gun grabber?

    Not one piece of gun control policy has emitted from this white house.

    I'm sure the gun/ammo companies want you to think guns are going out of style, but in America it ain't happening.

  • Lizard

    "Not one piece of gun control policy has emitted from this white house. "

    That doesn't testify to Obama's viewpoints, it testifies to his competence.

    Every day I thank God that he isn't smart enough to implement his own agenda. Then again, if he were brighter, maybe he would have a different agenda.

  • D-Vega

    Right, "it ain't gonna happen, but let's promote the fear of it."

  • whats_up

    Right, "it ain't gonna happen, but let's promote the fear of it."

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-09-09 11:12:25

    Of course they do Vega, it is the SOP, look at every issue they bring out things and they just know are going to happen, this be a prime issue. No one from Obamas administration has put forth any bill that would ban guns anywhere. But they claim that he is still going to do that, despite the reality that he is not, has said that he wont (remember, conservatives say that we should listen to what he says, I guess on every issue but this one.) It is really sad to see such a grand party reduced to shills and fearmongers, I guess that is what happens when you let the kooks run your party.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    I don't think the majority of what he says is radical, though.

    No, of course you don't.

    I also think that this guy is not going to be a judge, or a legislator.

    No, worse: the regulatory czar. He will be the person who (as in the title of his book) nudges things into place. A little more regulation here… a form to fill out there… a longer waiting period over there… and soon, it will be as impossible to buy a handgun as it would be to buy a cruise missile. And about as expensive. I bet Sunstein soiled his pants with delight when someone came up with the idea of requiring ammunition to have serial numbers. It's all for the public good, of course.

    And the recent SCOTUS decision on the 2nd has been a dramatic move.

    Have you tried to buy a handgun in Washington DC since that decision? It's actually harder to do now, according to people I know in the area.

  • TheBaud

    Right, "it ain't gonna happen, but let's promote the fear of it."

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-09-09 11:12:25

    Except guns HAVE been banned and they have been banned by Liberals. And Obama is on record being for gun control. It is a part of his agenda he has not gotten to yet.

  • tblrk2006

    Not one piece of gun control policy has emitted from this white house.

    I'm sure the gun/ammo companies want you to think guns are going out of style, but in America it ain't happening.

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-09-09 11:06:51

    Oh, so we should just not listen to a thing he and holder have said and still are saying?

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    "it ain't gonna happen, but let's promote the fear of it."

    As if the right has a monopoly on that particular ploy of politics. Please, it's common to all politicians and their political movements. Alinsky codified it into his set of rules, for heaven's sake:

    RULE 1: "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood.

    RULE 2: "Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.

    RULE 3: "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.

    RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.

    RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

    RULE 6: "A good tactic is one your people enjoy." They'll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They're doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.

    RULE 7: "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." Don't become old news.

    RULE 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.

    RULE 9: "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.

    RULE 10: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.

    RULE 11: "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative." Never let the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution to the problem.

    RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

    I was going to post just the rule from Alinsky germane to the comment, but upon re-reading the whole set of rules and comparing the behaviours they describe to so much of what some of our most vociferous lefties say and do here, I thought there might be a teachable moment on how these rules get applied day in and day out.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Of course they do Vega, it is the SOP, look at every issue they bring out things and they just know are going to happen, this be a prime issue.

    Posted by whats_up

    2009-09-09 11:17:25

    You mean like GLOBAL COOLING? GLOBAL WARMING? Bush is gonna suspend COTUS? Power Lines/Cell Phones cause Brain Cancer? DDT is dangerous to humans? CO2 is a health hazard?

    You mean those SCARE TACTICS, those PRIME examples of Fear Mongering?

    STFU WU, you're talking out of your gaping A$$, AGAIN.

  • D-Vega

    wait, DDT is not dangerous to humans?

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    wait, DDT is not dangerous to humans?

    Not nearly as dangerous as other pesticides. Sure, if you fill an entire room with DDT and take a deep breath you'll have problems, but used in the same concentrations as standard off-the-shelf bug spray it's pretty much harmless.

  • D-Vega

    Like I said. "It ain't gonna happen, but promote the fear anyways."

  • TheBaud

    Like I said. "It ain't gonna happen, but promote the fear anyways."

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-09-09 14:06:36

    And you know "It ain't gonna happen" the same way you KNOW Ken Gladney is faking! Right!

    Obama's past history is one for gun control. Why would that change now that he has more power. It may not be on the menu now, but in six months or a year, who knows.

    I know for a fact that YOU DON'T!

  • tblrk2006

    Like I said. "It ain't gonna happen, but promote the fear anyways."

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-09-09 14:06:36

    Vega, were obama and holder just talking out of their ass all those times?

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    Like I said. "It ain't gonna happen, but promote the fear anyways."

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-09-09 14:06:36

    It looks like Vega is applying Alinsky rule 5:

    RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

    with maybe a dash of rule 8 thrown in:

    RULE 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.

    and perhaps a dash of rule 12 for good measure:

    RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

  • Mike_M

    “No one from Obamas administration has put forth any bill that would ban guns anywhere.”

    You’re right, as he’s moved directly to thought crime. Why ban guns when you can just ban disagreement with Obama? Go to a protest, write a critical op-ed, or stand up for your freedoms and this Administration paints you as an “extremist” and encourages others to turn you in directly to Obama.
    I suspect gun sales to keep trending upward as Obama establishes his Sturmabteilung (civilian security force) to bust heads and supress dissent as his Presidency continues its free fall into the crapper.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Actually the gun sales started pretty much with the win in November, they weren't based on fear-mongering. The sales were based on two concerns, whether genuine or not:

    1) That Obama and the Democrats in congress would try to take away guns

    2) That it would be a good idea to be armed if things go really pear-shaped in the country.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Like I said. "It ain't gonna happen, but promote the fear anyways."

    Yeah, I mean, it's not like Obama supporters have been assaulting conservative protesters or anything. Right?

  • D-Vega

    "two concerns, whether genuine or not" means "fear", CT.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    D-Vega, fear or not what I was disagreeing with was the "mongering" part, not the "fear" part.

    You were stating openly that people had been scared into buying guns by opponents of the president who were spreading fear. The idea that people might, of their own accord, be concerned apparently never occurred to you.

    Whether that's because as a leftist you think everything has to be ginned up by astroturfing organizers or you figure President Obama is so heavenly and perfect no one could possibly be afraid unless tricked into it we can only guess at.

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info