For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
“The American People Are Acting Like A Bunch Of Spoiled Brats”?
Written By : John Hawkins

Ever notice that the mainstream media only accuses the public of acting like “spoiled brats” or of “throwing a temper tantrum” when liberals get tossed out of office? For example, did you hear anyone in the MSM complaining about the public being angry, irrational, and childish when they voted Republicans out of office in 2006 or 2008? Of course, not.

Yet, here’s Eugene Robinson getting an early start on a meme you are going to see over and over and over again between now and the end of the year,

The spoiled-brat American electorate

According to polls, Americans are in a mood to hold their breath until they turn blue. Voters appear to be so fed up with the Democrats that they’re ready to toss them out in favor of the Republicans — for whom, according to those same polls, the nation has even greater contempt. This isn’t an “electoral wave,” it’s a temper tantrum.

…In the punditry business, it’s considered bad form to question the essential wisdom of the American people. But at this point, it’s impossible to ignore the obvious: The American people are acting like a bunch of spoiled brats.

…The nation demands the impossible: quick, painless solutions to long-term, structural problems. While they’re running for office, politicians of both parties encourage this kind of magical thinking. When they get into office, they’re forced to try to explain that things aren’t quite so simple — that restructuring our economy, renewing the nation’s increasingly rickety infrastructure, reforming an unsustainable system of entitlements, redefining America’s position in the world and all the other massive challenges that face the country are going to require years of effort. But the American people don’t want to hear any of this. They want somebody to make it all better. Now.

Now certainly, I would agree that the American people want it all: They want painless, free solutions to their problems — that have no negative consequences. But, if we’re honest, isn’t that what all of us want in our hearts, even if intellectually, we know it’s not possible?

Yet, here’s the key thing that the “American People Are Acting Like A Bunch Of Spoiled Brats” crowd misses (and, yes, there are a few of them on the Right, too, even though most of them are on the Left),

The nation demands the impossible: quick, painless solutions to long-term, structural problems. While they’re running for office, politicians of both parties encourage this kind of magical thinking. When they get into office, they’re forced to try to explain that things aren’t quite so simple — that restructuring our economy, renewing the nation’s increasingly rickety infrastructure, reforming an unsustainable system of entitlements, redefining America’s position in the world and all the other massive challenges that face the country are going to require years of effort. But the American people don’t want to hear any of this. They want somebody to make it all better. Now.

So, let me get this straight: Politicians lie to the American people to get elected and we’re supposed to conclude that the public is full of “spoiled brats” because they get angry when they find out they’ve been misled? You’re SUPPOSED to get angry when people lie to you. You’re SUPPOSED to throw politicians out of office for lying. Do people like Robinson think the American people should thank the sociopaths in Congress for misrepresenting what they wanted to do?

Here’s an old fashioned idea: How about we demand that politicians in both parties tell the truth about what they want to do instead of accusing the public of having a “temper tantrum” because they reacted negatively to policies they never voted for in the first place?

0
  • baoxian

    Or maybe they just didn't want a government takeover of health care, the nationalization of GM, toxic policies that have doubled the unemployment rate, a skyrocketing national debt, and a shockingly corrupt and ineffective “Stimulus” plan that's done nothing but devalue the dollar and saddle future generations with debt. We needn't even get into the reshaping of the Executive Branch of government into one huge Muslim Outreach Bureau.

    By the way, Eugene Robinson also blasted Bush in previous articles for attempting to reform Social Security…exactly the kind of long term thinking he asks for now. I guess it takes one to know one when it comes to childish behavior.

    • Proud Infidel

      BINGO, Bao, if it makes the talking heads in the MSM cuss, it's got to be a change for the better!!

      Expecting raging moonbat hissyfit and attempted threadjacking in 10…9…8…

    • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

      Don't forget the legal attack on Arizona for merely trying to enforce federal immigration laws. I think that grates on a lot more people than anyone is aware of.

  • billdalasio

    I've generally found that the “spoiled brat” behavior is more typical of the political class (of which Robinson and the rest of the MSM are just hangers on). Sure, the public wants contradictory things and to get to ignore scarcity. But, generally, they're mature enough to recognize that they're going to have to make choices. What they expect is that those choices will be made in honest terms – not being told that tough times demand sacrifice while favored political groups become the recipients of record largesse. Consider, for a momoent, Mr. Robinson's litany of complaints. Mr. Robinson and I have different memories of the public's expressed desire. I don't recall the public demanding the economy be entirely restructured, that the government engage in a massive infrastructure campaign, or that America redefine its position in the world. I recall the elite media demanding such things, but not the public. Mr. Robinson's screed seems largely a tantrum that this agenda has been rejected by the public.

  • Art

    Being called a spoiled brat by a member of the lying hypocrits club is not really such a bad thing.

  • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

    We all knew it was a matter of time before at least one person in the media called America names for disagreeing with them politically. Again.

  • Hourman910

    Comments like this, and the liberal elite are wondering why the American people have turned against them.

    • Russ

      the Americans haven't turned against them dude; they just THINK they have.

  • Russ

    “So, let me get this straight: Politicians lie to the American people to get elected and we're supposed to conclude that the public is full of “spoiled brats” because they get angry when they find out they've been misled? You're SUPPOSED to get angry when people lie to you. You're SUPPOSED to throw politicians out of office for lying. Do people like Robinson think the American people should thank the sociopaths in Congress for misrepresenting what they wanted to do?”

    Misread? Are you kidding me?

    Americas–and humans in general–want Socialism implemented until it actually works. Oh…it never will; guess they'll have to learn that the hard way. Oh sorry…we haven't learned that in over 2000 years. Nevermind….

    I have a challenge for America: you say you want freedom, individual rights, and taxation only with representation? PROVE IT.

    Ok sure fine…you elected one or two Tea Party folks.

    Can you keep that up? And I don't just mean for one or two election cycles…I mean for SEVERAL of them; like, oh I don' know..at least 50 years if not more?

    “The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance”.

    Remember that.

  • Willy

    I heard the same thing, almost word for word, in 1994.

  • UFKA_Smithwick

    Wait, isn't he describing exactly what happened in the presidential election of 2008?

  • UFKA_Smithwick

    But please dems, run on this platform: you stupid brats don't know how great you have it under us, you should be thanking us for how awesome things are.

  • mightysamurai

    Voters appear to be so fed up with the Democrats that they're ready to toss them out in favor of the Republicans — for whom, according to those same polls, the nation has even greater contempt.

    Bullshit. No poll I've read shows Republican approval rates lower than Democrat approval rates.

    • blkdragon

      Well, you're clearly not reading the correct polls there Samurai. Didn't you get the News Corp Interoffice Poll results, or the Liberal Anchors Only Poll results, or even the results from the Undergraduate Modern Media Students Poll? (Graduate poll results to be released later, after the have finished massaging the data to their satisfaction.)
      Those polls CLEARLY show the Republicans polling worse than the Democrats in every category. Get with the program.

  • Choey

    Anyone who actually believes a politicians campaign promises has to be terminally naive. We are not after “quick painless solutions”, we are after “solutions” which by definition are things that work. When the politicians we elected prove to be incompetent or corrupt we replace them. That is what's happening now….

    • UFKA_Smithwick

      Personally I would favor an end to governments attempts at “solutions” in this area.

      You can only watch your well-meaning but slightly special neighbor pour so many buckets of gasoline on your burning house before you have to politely ask him to stop 'helping'.

      “When the politicians we elected prove to be incompetent or corrupt we replace them.”

      Sadly not very often. Everyone is pissed at the government just about, but come election time we tend to reelect those same folks to office.

      Hard to even be angry at the politicians anymore, they are responding to how the public votes and we seem to favor their behavior (in the voting booth at least if not publicly).

  • Robert Arvanitis

    Remember that it was in 1994 that Peter Jennings attacked voters for throwing a “temper tantrum,” the electorate repudiated Clinton's first leftist assault.

    Also note that he was not even an American citizen at the time. It was not until 2003 that he added US citizenship while keeping his Canadian passport as well

    From USA Today

    (http://www.usatoday.com/life/2003-07-08-jennings_x.htm)

    Posted 7/8/2003 10:40 PM

    Canadian Peter Jennings becomes a U.S. citizen

    By Peter Johnson, USA TODAY

    ABC News anchor Peter Jennings, a Canadian, once described his mother, Elizabeth, as “pretty anti-American.”

    Which may explain why it took him until nine years after her death to do what he has been thinking about doing for some time: become a U.S. citizen.

    ******

    So a mere talking head felt it necessary to editorialize while supposedly covering the hard news of elections. And a non-citizen felt qualified to berate American voters. And Jennings dared not correct that lack of standing until his America-hating mother was dead.

    The media have always been morally bankrupt and left-biased. It's only just now that we are catching on…

Advertisement
Featured Video

Ed Klein on ‘The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House’

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info