<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Right Wing News &#187; McQ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightwingnews.com/author/mcq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightwingnews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:04:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;ll love this</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/youll-love-this/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/youll-love-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=13727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another one of those violent, hateful Tea Party Events the left hates:

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/youll-love-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frank Rich v. Peggy Noonan &#8211; compare and contrast &#8220;competent&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/frank-rich-v-peggy-noona-compare-and-contrast-competent/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/frank-rich-v-peggy-noona-compare-and-contrast-competent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 18:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=13396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frank Rich has never seen an act by President Obama of which he didn&#8217;t approve or, if approval wasn&#8217;t really credibly possible, anything for which he couldn&#8217;t find an excuse. The oil spill is no exception:
Whatever Obama’s failings, he is infinitely more competent at coping with catastrophe than his predecessor. President Bush’s top disaster managers — the Homeland Security secretary, Michael Chertoff, as well as the notorious “Brownie” — professed ignorance of New Orleans’s humanitarian crisis a full day after the nation had started watching it live in real time ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/frank-rich-v-peggy-noona-compare-and-contrast-competent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donkey, symbol of the Democratic Party, blown up in Gaza</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/donkey-symbol-of-the-democratic-party-blown-up-in-gaza/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/donkey-symbol-of-the-democratic-party-blown-up-in-gaza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 22:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=13182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, it got your attention, didn&#8217;t it?
And yes a donkey did get blown up in Gaza and no, it wasn&#8217;t the doing of the Republicans (well, not that we know of). They&#8217;d most likely have blown themselves up.
Anyway:
A small Syrian-backed terrorist group in Gaza said its activists blew up a donkey cart laden with explosives close to the border with Israel on Tuesday, killing the animal but causing no human casualties.
Abu Ghassan, spokesman for the terrorist group, said more than 200 kilograms of dynamite were heaped on the animal-drawn cart. ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/donkey-symbol-of-the-democratic-party-blown-up-in-gaza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats &#8211; talk about tone deaf</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/democrats-talk-about-tone-deaf/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/democrats-talk-about-tone-deaf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=12071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes I just love the Democrats.  They&#8217;re so out-of-touch they&#8217;re just comical at times. After fomenting a near meltdown over the Arizona immigration law, with charges of nazism and cries of &#8220;show me you papers!&#8221; flying hither and yon, the Democrats introduce an immigration framework with what?
Improved papers, of course.
Yes, the Dems screwed the pooch and included a national ID card in their proposed legislation.  And a biometric one at that.   As someone characterized it, it&#8217;s a &#8220;super Social Security card&#8221;.  Remember when you were assured that your SS card/number ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/democrats-talk-about-tone-deaf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About GM&#8217;s supposed debt repayment</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/bailouts/about-gms-supposed-debt-repayment/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/bailouts/about-gms-supposed-debt-repayment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=11669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have seen the announcement yesterday by GM&#8217;s CEO that it was paying back a portion of the money it had been loaned by the taxpayers (who borrowed it to loan it) to keep the company from going under and providing it the room for the government to own 61%. 
The White House was exultant:
No one was cheering louder than the White House about General Motors&#8217; repayment of $6.7 billion in loans from the federal government.
 First thing this morning, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs alerted his 56,000 followers on Twitter of ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/bailouts/about-gms-supposed-debt-repayment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mission impossible</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/mission-impossible/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/mission-impossible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=11305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, in the New York Times and other media outlets:
President Barack Obama secured a promise from President Hu Jintao of China on Monday to join negotiations on a new package of sanctions against Iran, administration officials said, but Hu made no specific commitment to backing measures that the United States considers severe enough to force a change in direction in Iran&#8217;s nuclear program.
In a 90-minute conversation before the opening of a summit meeting on nuclear security, Obama sought to win more cooperation from China by directly addressing one of the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/mission-impossible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we in &#8220;death panel&#8221; territory yet?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/are-we-in-death-panel-territory-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/are-we-in-death-panel-territory-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=10881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Leonhardt spends about a 1,000 words in the New York Times banging around the edges of what has to be done by government to cut health care costs. Or, as he calls it &#8220;In Medicine, the Power of No&#8221;. He wonders if we can every really learn to say &#8220;no&#8221;. And, of course, he&#8217;s talking about saying no to sick people, to patients &#8211; denying them care.
From an economic perspective, health reform will fail if we can’t sometimes push back against the try-anything instinct. The new agencies will be ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/are-we-in-death-panel-territory-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is the reactionary now?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/who-is-the-reactionary-now/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/who-is-the-reactionary-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=9903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ezra Klein has this to say about &#8220;the process&#8221; now under fire by Republicans:
So far in the health-care debate, Republicans have attacked the legitimacy of private negotiations, parochial dealmaking, the budget reconciliation process, self-executing rules, the Congressional Budget Office&#8217;s analyses, and even the constitutionality of the legislation. It&#8217;s a good theory: Make people hate Washington and mistrust the legislative process and you&#8217;ll make people hate and mistrust what emerges from that process.
But it&#8217;s also dangerous. As Republicans well know, private negotiations between lawmakers, deals that advantage a state or a ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/who-is-the-reactionary-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presidential job approval numbers &#8211; what do they mean?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/presidential-job-approval-numbers-what-do-they-mean/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/presidential-job-approval-numbers-what-do-they-mean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=9757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure everyone remembers the left&#8217;s constant trumpeting of negative presidential popularity polls during the Bush administration.  Understandably, now that the shoe is on the other foot, they&#8217;re not quite so keen on those polls anymore.  However there is an interesting point to be drawn from them.  Take this week&#8217;s Rasmussen poll on job approval numbers:
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 25% of the nation&#8217;s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-three percent ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/presidential-job-approval-numbers-what-do-they-mean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health care bill update</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-bill-update/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-bill-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=9190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few points about the status of health care reform.  First, if the votes were there for passage in the House, the bill would now be law.  That should tell you all you need to know about the present status of the bill.  The votes aren&#8217;t there.  The bottom line, however, is if the House manages to pass it, health care reform becomes law.  At that point, reconciliation is moot.  It will be part of the deal, but with or without reconciliation in the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-bill-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Summit review</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-summit-review/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-summit-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=8794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been watching and/or listening to the health care summit today and it became fairly obvious from the opening bell that there wasn&#8217;t going to be much of anything worthwhile or substantive accomplished &#8211; not that I&#8217;m surprised.   5 hours into it, it has been mostly the exchange of talking points.  Right now I&#8217;m forced to listen to Henry Waxman give his.  He&#8217;s claiming his version of the bill is the best and the Republican&#8217;s version sucks.  Pretty much the way it has gone all ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-summit-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russia: How&#8217;s that &#8220;Reset Button&#8221; working?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/russia-hows-that-reset-button-working/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/russia-hows-that-reset-button-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=8739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The push for international support for tougher sanctions against Iran seem to be going well with our good friends in Russia:
Russia will not support &#8220;crippling&#8221; sanctions against Iran, including any that may be slapped on the Islamic Republic&#8217;s banking or energy sectors, a senior Russian diplomat said Wednesday.
[...]
&#8220;We are not got going to work on sanctions or measures which could lead to the political or economic or financial isolation of this country,&#8221; Oleg Rozhkov, deputy director of the security affairs and disarmament department at Russia&#8217;s Foreign Ministry, told reporters.
&#8220;What relation ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/russia-hows-that-reset-button-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terrorism = Burglary</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/terrorism-burglary/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/terrorism-burglary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=8297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Counterterrorism Czar John Brennan made a comparison this weekend that has landed him in hot water. Speaking at the Islamic Center at New York University on Saturday and apparently in response to a question about recidivism among the Gitmo inmates who had been released, he said the rate was about 20%.
Ok, that&#8217;s arguable, but it is a number that has been tossed around by any number of people. That isn&#8217;t what got him in trouble. If we stipulate that the 20% of terror suspects released have returned to extremism or ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/terrorism-burglary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote Of The Day</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/quote-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/quote-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=7985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The QOTD for today actually comes to us from a NY Times editorial in 2005 which clearly states their understanding of the job of an opposition party:
Mr. Bush has reacted by railing against Democrats for obstruction &#8212; as if Democrats are duty-bound to breathe life into his agenda and, even sillier, as if opposing a plan that the people do not want is an illegitimate tactic for an opposition party.
Why I believe that is exactly the point the right is now arguing. As witnessed by the editorial, the Democrats, lefty ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/quote-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eye On The Polls &#8211; Not Good News For Democrats Or Incumbents (Update)</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/eye-on-the-polls-not-good-news-for-democrats-or-incumbents-update/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/eye-on-the-polls-not-good-news-for-democrats-or-incumbents-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=7934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bunch of interesting polls have emerged today. One finds Obama at his lowest job performance rating yet. Of course, as you might expect, Republicans mostly disapprove of his job performance. Democrats, on the other hand, generally approve. But what gets his job approval rating to 44% approval, 47% disapproval in this Marist poll are the independents. They&#8217;re very dissatisfied with his performance &#8211; only 29% approve while almost twice that number, 57% disapprove.
Remember it was the independents who put Obama over the top in 2008. Also remember it was ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/eye-on-the-polls-not-good-news-for-democrats-or-incumbents-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Prefer Tax Cuts Over A Balanced Budget?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/republicans-prefer-tax-cuts-over-a-balanced-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/republicans-prefer-tax-cuts-over-a-balanced-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=7723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the buzz going around some liberal blogs about a Rasmussen poll which claims that a plurality of Republicans polled would rather see tax cuts and a deficit than a balanced budget and tax increases (one supposes the increases would be used to balance it.  The history of our government says otherwise).
Of course I&#8217;m of the opinion there&#8217;s a third choice.  Cut spending commensurate with the tax cuts and reduce the size of government until you&#8217;re able to balance the budget.  Then start reducing the debt.  ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/republicans-prefer-tax-cuts-over-a-balanced-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Should Embrace “Party Of ‘No’”</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/gop-should-embrace-%e2%80%9cparty-of-%e2%80%98no%e2%80%99%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/gop-should-embrace-%e2%80%9cparty-of-%e2%80%98no%e2%80%99%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=7573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the &#8217;60s and &#8217;70s when leftist anti-war protesters began calling the police &#8220;pigs&#8221;, police forces turned the tables and defined the epithet as &#8220;Pride, Integrity, Guts&#8221; thereby taking ownership of it. The GOP should take ownership of the &#8220;Party of &#8216;No&#8217;&#8221;.
Why? Because sometimes &#8211; in fact, many times &#8211; saying &#8220;no&#8221; to the opposition is not only responsible, it is an absolute necessity. In many cases, given what the ideological opposition attempts to pass into law, it is the job of the minority to say &#8220;no&#8221;. Bi-partisanship for bi-partisanship&#8217;s ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/gop-should-embrace-%e2%80%9cparty-of-%e2%80%98no%e2%80%99%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOTU Fact Check</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/sotu-fact-check/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/sotu-fact-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=7395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surprisingly, AP does it (credit where credit is due).  They cover the &#8220;spending freeze&#8221; (it would amount to less than 1% of the deficit) which we&#8217;ve covered in some detail.  They also point out that the nonsense about the health care plan preserving the &#8220;right&#8221; of Americans to keep their doctor and their plan isn&#8217;t exactly true (we&#8217;ve covered that before as well).   And they take on the claim about lobbyists which Michael has handled quite well below.
AP also talks about the deficit commission that Obama ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/sotu-fact-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Had To Laugh &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/i-had-to-laugh/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/i-had-to-laugh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=7247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marion Berry, Democratic Representative from Arkansas, has decided to retire from Congress voluntarily instead of chancing an involuntary retirement via the ballot box.  Berry is considered a &#8220;blue dog&#8221; Democrat and is from a nominally conservative state whose voters have made it clear they don&#8217;t support the policies or agenda of this Congress or this president.
Berry relates an incident that struck me as the ultimate in hubris and arrogance:
Berry recounted meetings with White House officials, reminiscent of some during the Clinton days, where he and others urged them not ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/i-had-to-laugh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic Disaray Attributable To Obama&#8217;s Lack Of Leadership</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/democratic-disaray-attributable-to-obamas-lack-of-leadership/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/democratic-disaray-attributable-to-obamas-lack-of-leadership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=7052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is so obvious it frustrates me that others are too ideologically or politically blind to admit it.  The reason the Democrats are in the shape they&#8217;re in today has to do with the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and his obvious lack of leadership.
Let me give you the latest example found in a Politico article today.  It is, in fact, all about why the legislative agenda is in trouble and Democrats are skittish.
Congressional Democrats — stunned out of silence by Scott Brown’s victory in Massachusetts — ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/democratic-disaray-attributable-to-obamas-lack-of-leadership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dems Try To Pre-emptively Define New GOP Responsibility</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/dems-try-to-pre-emptively-define-new-gop-responsibility/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/dems-try-to-pre-emptively-define-new-gop-responsibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=6918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That didn&#8217;t take long.  After essentially ignoring Senate Republicans for a year (well except when they thought they could pick one or two off to help them make something appear &#8220;bi-partisan&#8221;), Democrats are now ready to lecture Republicans about their new &#8220;responsibility&#8221;.  In a talking points memo issued to Democratic Senators today, they lay out their argument.  The memo is entitled:
MASSACHUSETTS ELECTION MEANS THAT SENATE REPUBLICANS HAVE MORE RESPONSIBILITY TO GOVERN, NOT OBSTRUCT
We can literally spend the entire post on just the title.  Contained in that ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/dems-try-to-pre-emptively-define-new-gop-responsibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts: Democratic Pants On The Ground</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/massachusetts-democratic-pants-on-the-ground/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/massachusetts-democratic-pants-on-the-ground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=6831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AP has just called the Massachusetts Senate race for Republican Scott Brown (9:25 pm) who looks like he&#8217;ll end up with anywhere from a 5 to 7 point win.
Probably the most interesting thing I saw during the coverage was feedback during a Frank Lunz group on Fox (I watched MSNBC most of the night which was, well frankly, highly entertaining).  The group were predominantly Democrats who voted for Obama.  And a good majority of them claim to have voted for Brown.  When asked why they said they ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/massachusetts-democratic-pants-on-the-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Doctors Afford To Stay In Medicare?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/can-doctors-afford-to-stay-in-medicare/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/can-doctors-afford-to-stay-in-medicare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=6752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a very interesting but probably little noted piece at Fox News by Dr. C.L. Gray, who is, interestingly enough, the president of Physicians For Reform.  His general premise is that while reform is needed in the medical field, what Congress is chasing is not at all the answer.  And he uses Medicare as the vehicle to make his point.
I&#8217;m sure you remember the story that came out not long ago about the Mayo Clinic deciding not to take anymore Medicare patients.  If you&#8217;ve been staying abreast, ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/can-doctors-afford-to-stay-in-medicare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s Failure Can Be Blamed On Congressional Democrats</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/obama%e2%80%99s-failure-can-be-blamed-on-congressional-democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/obama%e2%80%99s-failure-can-be-blamed-on-congressional-democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=6603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a lot of analysis going on about Obama&#8217;s first year and why, it seems, his job approval numbers are so dismal.  And why, given the promise he brought to the White House, at least according to the PR faithfully pushed by his campaign, are Democrats looking at the possibility of large net losses in both houses of Congress?
The first hints of the dissatisfaction of the electorate came in the Virginia and New Jersey gubernatorial races where Republicans won – in VA handily.  The Democrats claimed their ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/obama%e2%80%99s-failure-can-be-blamed-on-congressional-democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts: The Best Laid Plans Of Democrats</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/massachusetts-the-best-laid-plans-of-democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/massachusetts-the-best-laid-plans-of-democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=6538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would appear that long-shot Republican Senate candidate Scott Brown has a fighting chance of winning the &#8220;Ted Kennedy Seat&#8221; in Massachusetts.  Brown reminded the moderator that the seat was, in fact, &#8220;the people&#8217;s seat&#8221;, not Ted Kennedy&#8217;s during a recent debate.  And, according to the latest Rasmussen poll, Brown is within 2 points of Democratic candidate Martha Coakley.
Much of that has to do with the hard work Brown has put in campaigning for the seat.  Much of it also has to do with an early entitlement ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/massachusetts-the-best-laid-plans-of-democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Reform: When Is &#8220;Cadillac Plan&#8221; Not A &#8220;Cadillac Plan?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-reform-when-is-cadillac-plan-not-a-cadillac-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-reform-when-is-cadillac-plan-not-a-cadillac-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=6467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why when you&#8217;re a part of a favored special interest group of course:
Unions tentatively struck a deal Tuesday to exempt collectively bargained healthcare plans from a tax on high-cost plans expected to be used to help raise revenue for the healthcare overhaul.
The left constantly clamors for &#8220;fairness&#8221; but quickly throws such concerns under the bus when it is possible that one of their favored special interest groups may be negatively effected.
As Philip Klein notes:
If this policy is adopted, it would mean that there could be two Americans receiving the exact ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-reform-when-is-cadillac-plan-not-a-cadillac-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Reform Bill &#8211; It Makes Bernie Madoff Seem Like A Piker</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-reform-bill-it-makes-bernie-madoff-seem-like-a-piker/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-reform-bill-it-makes-bernie-madoff-seem-like-a-piker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=6417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Wall Street Journal asks what many of us have been asking for quite some time – why aren&#8217;t the numerous and specific warnings about the real cost and destructiveness of the proposed health care plan being heeded?
Of course the simple answer is those who are determined to take health care under the government&#8217;s purview really don&#8217;t care – they finally have the opportunity long denied them and they plan on taking advantage of it.  So, much like the &#8220;science&#8221; of man-made global warming, they&#8217;ve picked their narrative, ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-reform-bill-it-makes-bernie-madoff-seem-like-a-piker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mini-Ice Age?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/mini-ice-age/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/mini-ice-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=6359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably not.  But the probability that the cold weather the world is experiencing might be part of a multi-decadal oscillation (MDO) and a natural cyclical occurrence puts a real dent in the so-called &#8220;science&#8221; of man-made global warming.
I found it interesting that over the weekend, the New York Times went to great lengths to explain that what was happening wasn&#8217;t a &#8220;global&#8221; event, but instead the product of an &#8220;Arctic Oscillation&#8221; which has planted a large high pressure cell over England and has diverted the jet stream south of ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/mini-ice-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Know Nothin&#8217; Bout History</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/dont-know-nothin-bout-history/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/dont-know-nothin-bout-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=6201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ever entertaining Ezra Klein, charter member of the juice-box mafia, and apparently not a history major says:
I&#8217;ll just note that Democrats will definitely lose their supermajority sooner than later. If not, something is going seriously wrong in the system. A competitive, two-party democracy shouldn&#8217;t have long periods of single-party dominance. The mid-20th century, which did see Democrats with that sort of majority in the House, was the product of a three-party system in which a party of conservative, racist Southerners entered into a coalition with the Democrats. But that&#8217;s ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/dont-know-nothin-bout-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Are We Closing Gitmo?  Not For The Reasons Stated</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/why-are-we-closing-gitmo-not-for-the-reasons-stated/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/why-are-we-closing-gitmo-not-for-the-reasons-stated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=6095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It remains a mystery, to me at least, why closing Gitmo is such a priority to this president.  In fact, it seems like it is the only campaign promise he actually plans on keeping, although to this point he&#8217;s been spectacularly unsuccessful.
But seriously, other than location, what does closing Gitmo and moving these &#8220;detainees&#8221; to a prison in Illinois accomplish?  Does Obama and the left actually believe that doing so will kill jihadi propaganda about the prison in Cuba which they claim is used as a recruiting tool?
“Make ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/why-are-we-closing-gitmo-not-for-the-reasons-stated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Yon: Handcuffed At Seattle Airport For Refusing To Divulge Earned Income</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/michael-yon-handcuffed-at-seattle-airport-for-refusing-to-divulge-earned-income/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/michael-yon-handcuffed-at-seattle-airport-for-refusing-to-divulge-earned-income/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=6009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the pleasure, last Sunday, of participating in an interview with Michael Yon on PunditReview radio.  Michael had finished up a year out of the country, covering both Afghanistan and Iraq as a citizen journalist (he&#8217;s covered those wars for 5 1/2 years).   He was in Hong Kong when we did the interview (you can hear it here).  You could tell how excited he was to be coming home to the US.  My last words to him were, &#8220;welcome home, Michael&#8221;.
 
And how was ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/michael-yon-handcuffed-at-seattle-airport-for-refusing-to-divulge-earned-income/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Obama Program FAIL?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/economy/another-obama-program-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/economy/another-obama-program-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=5963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears a number of economists and financial experts see it as a failure.  Not only a failure but an impediment to recovery.
 
The Obama administration&#8217;s $75 billion program to protect homeowners from foreclosure has been widely pronounced a disappointment, and some economists and real estate experts now contend it has done more harm than good.
 

The harm it has done is precisely the same harm that many of the larger programs have done, and something many on the right warned of at the time.  Instead of letting ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/economy/another-obama-program-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care &#8211; Meltdown On The Left</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-meltdown-on-the-left/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-meltdown-on-the-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=5354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to admit, if nothing else it has been entertaining watching all the factions among Democrats go to war over this health care fiasco.  You have the Liberal caucus in the House saying no vote without a public option.  Then there are the Blue Dogs saying no vote with a public option.  You have pro-life Dems refusing to support the bill without language like the Stupak amendment and the pro-abortion crew saying they won&#8217;t support it without abortion provisions.  In the Senate, no one but ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/health-care-meltdown-on-the-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fumbling Gitmo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/fumbling-gitmo/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/fumbling-gitmo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=5241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think perhaps the promise to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba &#8211; a supposed symbol of American shame &#8211; and the subsequent inability to do so is symbolic of how inept, to this point, this administration has been.  President Obama, while a candidate, had a guaranteed applause line each time he promised to close the facility.  The left had so thoroughly demonized it that it was prime red-meat for every campaign rally.  And, in fact, Obama signed an executive order on his first day in ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/fumbling-gitmo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Inconvenient Mess</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/an-inconvenient-mess/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/an-inconvenient-mess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=5155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copenhagen has settled into what can only be characterized as an embarrassment for those who had hoped to see a historic treaty limiting greenhouse gases signed.
World leaders — with Gordon Brown arriving tonight in the vanguard — are facing the humiliating prospect of having little of substance to sign on Friday, when they are supposed to be clinching an historic deal.
Yesterday, a bloc of third world nations walked out of the negotiations in a squabble about the lack of legally binding emissions targets for the richer countries.  And, of ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/an-inconvenient-mess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medicare Buy In?  Worst. Idea. Ever.</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/medicare-buy-in-worst-idea-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/medicare-buy-in-worst-idea-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What in the world are the Senate Democrats thinking?  Isn&#8217;t this supposed to be about &#8220;health care reform&#8221;?  Apparently their idea of reform is to take a system that has trillions of dollars in unfunded liabilities and expand it without ever addressing the underlying reason for the huge future debt?
Brilliant.  Just brilliant.
But apparently winning the process (passing something called &#8220;health care reform&#8221;) has become more important than the original purpose of &#8220;reform&#8221;.
This is just a stunningly bad idea, but one that seems to be generating some &#8220;enthusiasm&#8221; ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/medicare-buy-in-worst-idea-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WH Job Summit Results: Spend More Borrowed Money</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/wh-job-summit-results-spend-more-borrowed-money/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/wh-job-summit-results-spend-more-borrowed-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did I know that would be the inevitable outcome?
President Obama will propose using $200 billion from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to support creating jobs, White House officials confirmed Monday.
The president, in an economic speech before the Brookings Institution on Tuesday, will argue that the money would be well spent by funding projects to build bridges and roads, weatherize homes, and provide other assistance for small businesses as well as the unemployed.
Fund projects to build bridges and roads?  I thought that was the purpose of the 787 ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/wh-job-summit-results-spend-more-borrowed-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Aren&#8217;t Businesses Hiring?  EPA For One Reason &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/why-arent-businesses-hiring-epa-for-one-reason/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/why-arent-businesses-hiring-epa-for-one-reason/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As regular readers know, we&#8217;ve been talking about why businesses are sitting on the sidelines and not hiring at the moment.  Businesses don&#8217;t like unsettled questions about the arena in which they must operate.  Health care legislation will effect the cost of doing business.  Until that is settled, there&#8217;s little incentive to take a chance and hire or expand their business.   If it costs more to do so after the legislation is passed &#8211; and it seems it will, they&#8217;ll wait to see the eventual ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/why-arent-businesses-hiring-epa-for-one-reason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Settled Science?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/environment/settled-science/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/environment/settled-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Rasumssen, when it come to the topic global warming a majority of Americans don&#8217;t believe that to be true:
Most Americans (52%) believe that there continues to be significant disagreement within the scientific community over global warming.
While many advocates of aggressive policy responses to global warming say a consensus exists, the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 25% of adults think most scientists agree on the topic. Twenty-three percent (23%) are not sure.
That, of course, is a direct refutation of a statement by presidential spokesman Robert ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/environment/settled-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Returning Obama To Reality</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/returning-obama-to-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/returning-obama-to-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess we&#8217;re fresh out of unicorns and rainbows and claims to have improved America&#8217;s standing in the world today.  As you recall, while in China and during an interview there, Obama made the claim that he had changed the world&#8217;s attitude about the US.  And his claim was based on some poll which apparently reflected that.
Well given that the poll he cited was good enough for him to make the assertion then, I&#8217;d be interested in how he&#8217;d describe this poll&#8217;s results (Pew Global Attitudes survey) in ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/returning-obama-to-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Science&#8221; Or Politics?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/science-or-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/science-or-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raw politics, of course.
The rationalization begins by those with a vested interest (don&#8217;t forget the IPCC was awarded a Nobel prize for this scientific twaddle) in the &#8220;scientific consensus&#8221;.  In defense of the indefensible, the powers to be try to minimize what they can&#8217;t dismiss:
There is &#8220;virtually no possibility&#8221; of a few scientists biasing the advice given to governments by the UN&#8217;s top global warming body, its chair said today.
Rajendra Pachauri defended the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the wake of apparent suggestions in emails between climate ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/science-or-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Libertarian and Liberal Thanksgivings</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/libertarian-and-liberal-thanksgivings/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/libertarian-and-liberal-thanksgivings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thanksgiving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.
Usually I try to keep this day as a non-partisan, non-political day in which I wish everyone of every ideological persuasion the blessings of the day (and I still do!).  But as it happens, the day provided me with one of the best examples of the differences between libertarians and liberals I&#8217;ve seen in a while.  Two separate postings concerning Thanksgiving.  One from a liberal blogger, Ezra Klein, and one from a blogger who is a visitor at the American Enterprise Institute (Mark Perry).
Klein reprints ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/libertarian-and-liberal-thanksgivings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AGW Science Controversy Heats Up</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/environment/agw-science-controversy-heats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/environment/agw-science-controversy-heats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least in Europe.  And it is the only thing about this controversy that&#8217;s warming. One of the main warmist propagandists has been forced to concede that the revelation of the emails from within the CRU is a damning bit of evidence that things are not right (or ethical) with the results produced there:
It&#8217;s no use pretending this isn&#8217;t a major blow. The emails extracted by a hacker from the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia could scarcely be more damaging. I am now convinced that ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/environment/agw-science-controversy-heats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Asian Tour: Manufactured Failure Or Real Failure?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/obamas-asian-tour-manufactured-failure-or-real-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/obamas-asian-tour-manufactured-failure-or-real-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Fallows, at the Atlantic, is pretty sure President Obama&#8217;s Asian tour was much more successful than the media gives him credit for, and, in fact, entitles his piece &#8220;Manufactured Failure&#8220;.  His premise?  That the media covered the trip much more like a campaign swing and thus missed its real and more subtle significance &#8211;  and success.  His proof?  A couple of reader comments.
That&#8217;s not to say he may not have a bit of a point as it concerns the media coverage, but on the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/obamas-asian-tour-manufactured-failure-or-real-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AGW&#8217;s &#8220;Ecological Debt&#8221; = Redistribution Of Wealth On A Global Level</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/environment/agws-ecological-debt-redistribution-of-wealth-on-a-global-level/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/environment/agws-ecological-debt-redistribution-of-wealth-on-a-global-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the mounting questions about the science involved with theory of AGW, the reason most nations, especially &#8220;developing&#8221; nations, support the theory lock, stock and barrel is because they stand to receive a great deal of money and they don&#8217;t have to do a thing.
Central American nations will demand 105 billion dollars from industrialized countries for damages caused by global warming, the region&#8217;s representatives said on Friday.
Central American environment ministers gathered in Guatemala to discuss the so-called &#8220;ecological debt&#8221; owed to them and to set out a common position ahead ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/environment/agws-ecological-debt-redistribution-of-wealth-on-a-global-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voters Beginning To Blame Democrats About Recession</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/voters-beginning-to-blame-democrats-about-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/voters-beginning-to-blame-democrats-about-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was inevitable (the party in power always gets blamed &#8211; eventually), but that doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t like the fact that this perfect storm may crest precisely at the 2010 midterms (although you shouldn&#8221;t count out the possibility of Republicans completely blowing the opportunity):
Nearly two years into the recession, opinion about which political party is responsible for the severe economic downturn is shifting, according to a new national poll.
A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Friday morning indicates that 38 percent of the public blames Republicans for the country&#8217;s current ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/voters-beginning-to-blame-democrats-about-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Reid&#8217;s Version of the Health Care Monstrosity</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/harry-reids-version-of-the-health-care-monstrosity/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/harry-reids-version-of-the-health-care-monstrosity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=4044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over 2,000 pages (yeah, nothing can be hidden in there, can it?) the bill sets up at least 370.2 billion in new taxes over the next 10 years:
1. 40% excise tax on health coverage in excess of $8,500/$23,000 ($149.1 billion)
2. Employer W-2 reporting of value of health (negligible revenue effect)
3. Conform definition of medical expenses ($5.0 billion)
4. Increase penalty for nonqualified health savings account distributions to 20% ($1.3 billion)
5. Limit health flexible spending arrangements in cafeteria plans to $2,500 ($14.6 billion)
6. Require information reporting on payments to corporations ($17.1 billion)
7. ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/harry-reids-version-of-the-health-care-monstrosity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stimulus Funds Fat Tax Study</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/stimulus-funds-fat-tax-study/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/stimulus-funds-fat-tax-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fat Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one is right out of the &#8220;you&#8217;ve got to be kidding me&#8221; category.
It seems that stimulus funds, you know that 787 billion bill without an &#8220;ounce&#8221; of pork in it, are funding a study at the University of Illinois (wow, there&#8217;s a surprise) to look at &#8220;the relationship between fat taxes and food consumption, diet quality, and obesity.&#8221;
In reality it is a study to assess the feasibility of taxing soda, under the guise of fighting obesity, to fund health care reform.  You remember all the trial balloons that ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/stimulus-funds-fat-tax-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinning The RINO Herd?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/thinning-the-rino-herd/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/thinning-the-rino-herd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an interesting exchange between Chris Wallace and Republican GOP Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on Fox News Sunday yesterday:
WALLACE: Let me turn, because I would — I wouldn&#8217;t be able to live with myself if I didn&#8217;t ask you a few political questions, Senator.
Conservatives are now talking about launching primary challenges against candidates who are actually picked by the Senate Republican leadership in a number of states. We have them up on a map there — in Florida, in Connecticut, in Illinois, in California, and your home state of ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/thinning-the-rino-herd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Grey Lady Gets It Wrong &#8211; Again</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/the-grey-lady-gets-it-wrong-again/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/the-grey-lady-gets-it-wrong-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editorializing yesterday, the New York Times says:
Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. took a bold and principled step on Friday toward repairing the damage wrought by former President George W. Bush with his decision to discard the nation’s well-established systems of civilian and military justice in the treatment of detainees captured in antiterrorist operations.
From that entirely unnecessary policy (the United States had the tools to detain, charge and bring terrorists to justice) flowed a terrible legacy of torture and open-ended incarceration. It left President Obama with yet another mess to clean ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/the-grey-lady-gets-it-wrong-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Facts</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/taxes/tax-facts/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/taxes/tax-facts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some tax facts from the Tax Foundation [pdf]to ponder while you work toward paying off the government&#8217;s first claim on your paycheck today.
Fact 1: Not everyone is doing that.
Today, 46 million tax filers have no income tax liability after taking advantage of all of the credits and deductions in the tax  code—one-third of all tax filers.  Obama’s tax polices, such as the “Making Work Pay” tax credit, will increase the number of non-payers to more than 63 million.
Or 63 million won&#8217;t , as Scott Hodge of the Tax ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/taxes/tax-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why The GOP Remains A Minority</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/why-the-gop-remains-a-minority/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/why-the-gop-remains-a-minority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a week ago, amidst all the hoopla about the health care bill and then missed when the atrocity of Ft. Hood occurred, was this:
Even as a Senate global-warming bill remained in limbo with Democrats refusing to delay a committee vote until an economic analysis was completed, hopes rose for a potential bipartisan compromise.
The Senate, meanwhile, appears to be moving away from the bill, authored by Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., which would require a 20 percent reduction in carbon emissions by 2020 and would have ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/why-the-gop-remains-a-minority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Veteran&#8217;s Day</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/military/happy-veterans-day/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/military/happy-veterans-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who doubts all veteran&#8217;s are heroes need read no further. But for the vast majority of you who do, I&#8217;d like to take a little different slant in my tribute than you might read elsewhere. Most of the time when you read tributes to vets, they&#8217;re filled with the stories of those who&#8217;ve suffered in combat and we see pictures showing the battle-weary combat vets which pointedly make the argument about the sacrifices our veterans have made and continue to make.
But not all sacrifices are made on the field ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/military/happy-veterans-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Help Valor IT Reach Its Goal</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/misc/help-valor-it-reach-its-goal/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/misc/help-valor-it-reach-its-goal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Folks I normally don&#8217;t ask for donations or money.  But I&#8217;m making an exception today for one of the best organizations I know and for one of the best causes I know.  The organization is Soldier&#8217;s Angels.   The cause is their &#8220;Valor IT&#8221; fund raiser &#8211; now heading into its final weekend.
Soldier&#8217;s Angels is an organization of volunteers which adopts individual soldiers and keeps them in the things they need during their deployments.  They also work extensively with the wounded and the families of the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/misc/help-valor-it-reach-its-goal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>East Germany Is Gone &#8211; Boo Hoo</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/europe/east-germany-is-gone-boo-hoo/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/europe/east-germany-is-gone-boo-hoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to read this one to believe it.  Bruni de la Motte, a child of the GDR, tells us how hard life has been for her since the fall of the Berlin Wall.  The irony is that while she tries to convince of all that was good and wonderful about her former homeland, she never mentions the fact that if she&#8217;d have written a whine like this while a citizen of the GDR we&#8217;d most likely not even know she ever existed.  Nothing like romanticizing a ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/europe/east-germany-is-gone-boo-hoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About That AMA Endorsement</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/health/about-that-ama-endorsement/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/health/about-that-ama-endorsement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday President Obama took time out of what one would presume was a busy day to tout the fact that the AMA and the AARP had endorsed the latest House version of health care reform.
But it appears that some of the rank and file are none too happy with the endorsement.  In fact many are quite upset that the endorsement was made prior to their meeting in Houston this weekend.  There are moves afoot to introduce resolutions at the meeting to rescind the endorsement.
Former AMA president Stormy Johnson ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/health/about-that-ama-endorsement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Buying Oil Leases Off American Shore?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/daily-news/china-buying-oil-leases-off-american-shore/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/daily-news/china-buying-oil-leases-off-american-shore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the word from Mark Tapscott at the Washington Examiner:
Gas prices here in the U.S. are creeping back up towards the $3-per-gallon mark even as news breaks today that China&#8217;s state-owned energy firm just closed a deal to buy interests in four development leases on the American Outer Continental Shelf (OTS) in the Gulf of Mexico.
The deal, which requires approval of the U.S. government, is between Norway&#8217;s Statoil and China National Off-Shore Oil Corporation (CNOOC). This is the same CNOOC that would have bought Unocal four years ago for $18.5 ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/daily-news/china-buying-oil-leases-off-american-shore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buyer&#8217;s Remorse In Iowa</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/buyers-remorse-in-iowa/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/buyers-remorse-in-iowa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the day, one year ago today, that the world was supposed to change with the election of Barack Obama to the presidency of the United States.  Yet, as the New York Times tells us, in Iowa &#8211; a heartland state that went for Obama &#8211; the reviews of his presidency to this point get decidely mixed reviews.
Take the time to read the article, but what stood out for me were the following:
1. The &#8220;blame Bush&#8221; response to the problems he&#8217;s facing is wearing very thin.  If ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/buyers-remorse-in-iowa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ezra Klein&#8217;s Astonishing New Health Care Charts</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/health/ezra-kleins-astonishing-new-health-care-charts/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/health/ezra-kleins-astonishing-new-health-care-charts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezra Klein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or at least they seem to have astonished Klein.  Here&#8217;s one as an example: 

My goodness.  As Klein says:
There is a simple explanation for why American health care costs so much more than health care in any other country: because we pay so much more for each unit of care.
Anyone &#8211; what&#8217;s missing from this rather simplistic explanation?
Cost.
What is the real cost of delivering the expected/desired/demanded health care during a doctor&#8217;s visit?  What is the cost per &#8220;unit delivered&#8221;.  And if it is higher, why is ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/health/ezra-kleins-astonishing-new-health-care-charts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stimulus Funds Used For Mapping Radioactive Rabbit Feces</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/stimulus-funds-used-for-mapping-radioactive-rabbit-feces/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/stimulus-funds-used-for-mapping-radioactive-rabbit-feces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8216;m not kidding.  So says none other than the New York Times:
A Week Mapping Radioactive Rabbit Feces With Detectors Mounted On A Helicopter Flying 50 Feet Over The Desert Scrub. … $300,000 In Federal Stimulus Money.” &#8230; “A government contractor at Hanford, in south-central Washington State, just spent a week mapping radioactive rabbit feces with detectors mounted on a helicopter flying 50 feet over the desert scrub. … the helicopter flights, which covered 13.7 square miles and were paid for with $300,000 in federal stimulus money, took place in ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/stimulus-funds-used-for-mapping-radioactive-rabbit-feces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Your Taxes Won&#8217;t Go Up By A Single Dime&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/your-taxes-wont-go-up-by-a-single-dime/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/your-taxes-wont-go-up-by-a-single-dime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#8217;t that the promise?  Well Americans For Tax Reform have looked at the 1990 pages of the House monstrosity and found 13 taxes that will indeed raise yours by much more than a &#8220;dime&#8221; [HT: United Liberty].  Here are just three of them.  You can take a look at the entire list here. [pdf]


Employer Mandate Excise Tax (Page 275): If an employer does not pay 72.5 percent of a single employee’s health premium (65 percent of a family employee), the employer must pay an excise tax equal ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/your-taxes-wont-go-up-by-a-single-dime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Choice and Competition&#8221; &#8211; But Not For Education</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/choice-and-competition-but-not-for-education/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/choice-and-competition-but-not-for-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vouchers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=3027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House tell us that the government public option in health care insurance reform will introduce &#8220;choice and competition&#8221; into the insurance market.  But when it comes to education, which already &#8220;enjoys&#8221; a government monopoly, &#8220;choice and competition&#8221; are not at all something White House has any desire to introduce.
And, in fact, it gets down right upset if you point that out:
President Obama isn&#8217;t taking kindly to a television ad that criticizes his opposition to a popular scholarship program for poor children, and his administration wants the ad ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/choice-and-competition-but-not-for-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>687</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY 23 &#8211; What Is Gingrich Smoking?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/ny-23-what-is-gingrich-smoking/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/ny-23-what-is-gingrich-smoking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually I&#8217;m in the camp that thinks Newt Gingrich is a pretty good political ideas man (and, frankly, believe that is the only role he should play in politics).  But if you&#8217;ve been watching this Scozzafava/Hoffman dustup in NY-23, you have to wonder if someone dropped him on his head recently.
Here he is on Greta Van Susteren&#8217;s show talking about it and pushing the candidacy of a person anyone would objectively call a liberal Republican candidate.  In fact, even Gingrich concedes that:
GINGRICH: Well, I just find it fascinating ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/ny-23-what-is-gingrich-smoking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FOX v White House: The Results Are In</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/fox-v-white-house-the-results-are-in/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/fox-v-white-house-the-results-are-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or at least the results since the Obama White House made FOX News the focus of its attempt at dictating which organizations should or shouldn&#8217;t be taken as serious &#8220;news&#8221; organizations:
But the White House&#8217;s stance also gave extra lift to the network at a time when it is on track to record its best ratings year ever. This year, Fox News has averaged nearly 1.2 million viewers across all its programming, a 16% increase over the same period last year, according to Nielsen. In the two weeks since aides to ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/fox-v-white-house-the-results-are-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact Checking The Democrats &#8211; Private Health Insurance</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/fact-checking-the-democrats-private-health-insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/fact-checking-the-democrats-private-health-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Private health insurance companies have been demonized by the Democrats and the administration as modern day &#8220;robber barons&#8221; who are raking in obscene profits mostly by denying you coverage.  But a simple fact checking dispels that sort of an attack as negative propaganda with no basis in reality:
Health insurance profit margins typically run about 6 percent, give or take a point or two. That&#8217;s anemic compared with other forms of insurance and a broad array of industries, even some beleaguered ones.
Profits barely exceeded 2 percent of revenues in the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/fact-checking-the-democrats-private-health-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You Were A Democrat In Congress, What Would Your First Domestic Priority Be?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/if-you-were-a-democrat-in-congress-what-would-your-first-domestic-priority-be/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/if-you-were-a-democrat-in-congress-what-would-your-first-domestic-priority-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Health care reform?
Cap-and-trade?
Or, perhaps, economic recovery and jobs?
On Thursday, Obama&#8217;s economic adviser Christina Romer told Congress the administration agrees with other analysts that the economy will grow in the third quarter, and beyond. Even so, she said, &#8220;unemployment is likely to remain at its severely elevated level,&#8221; and noted expectations that few jobs will be added through the third quarter of 2010.
And what happens during the 4th quarter of 2010?
So why are Democrats fiddling with health care reform and cap-and-trade instead of the economy and jobs?
All I can figure is ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/if-you-were-a-democrat-in-congress-what-would-your-first-domestic-priority-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TARP Report &#8211; &#8220;We don&#8217;t even know where the money went&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/bailouts/tarp-report-we-dont-even-know-where-the-money-went/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/bailouts/tarp-report-we-dont-even-know-where-the-money-went/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So let&#8217;s give them health care too!
Sorry, couldn&#8217;t help myself.  The quote in the title is from Democratic Representative Daniel Lipinski of IL.  It&#8217;s a good preface to a Treasury Department Inspector General report issued today which was rather scathing.  USA Today provides the &#8220;executive summary&#8221;:
A Treasury Department watchdog is warning that a key $700 billion bailout program has damaged the government&#8217;s credibility, won&#8217;t earn taxpayers all their money back and has done little to change a culture of recklessness on Wall Street.
Of course it also claims ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/bailouts/tarp-report-we-dont-even-know-where-the-money-went/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bribing Doctors With Your Money</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/bribing-doctors-with-your-money/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/bribing-doctors-with-your-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course this sort of political bribery isn&#8217;t necessarily unusual or confined to one party.  It is just a particularly blatant example of the practice that is at the heart of the rot infecting our form of government:
The White House and Democratic leaders are offering doctors a deal: They’ll freeze cuts in Medicare payments to doctors in exchange for doctors’ support of healthcare reform.
At a meeting on Capitol Hill last week with nearly a dozen doctors groups, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said the Senate would take up ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/bribing-doctors-with-your-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Votes To Restrict Free Speech (update)</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/obama-administration-votes-to-restrict-free-speech-update/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/obama-administration-votes-to-restrict-free-speech-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is worrisome.  I just featured a story in which Democrats have slipped a &#8220;hate speech&#8221; bill into the Defense Appropriations bill in a bid to further eroding our 1st Amendment protections.  Now we find out that the Obama administration has supported a UN resolution that is also designed to restrict free speech:
Around the world, free speech is being sacrificed on the altar of religion. Whether defined as hate speech, discrimination or simple blasphemy, governments are declaring unlimited free speech as the enemy of freedom of religion. This ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/obama-administration-votes-to-restrict-free-speech-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Wants Compliant Press</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/white-house-wants-compliant-press/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/white-house-wants-compliant-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8216;m still wondering what the upside is for the White House in this fight it is picking with Fox News.
We&#8217;ve seen Anita Dunn, White House communication&#8217;s director take them on, obviously at the behest of and at least with the tacit agreement, one assumes, of the President.  After all, he&#8217;s been known to complain about Fox and theirs was the only Sunday show on which he refused to appear recently.  Now we have David Axelrod throwing out the same nonsense:
White House senior adviser David Axelrod said Sunday that ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/white-house-wants-compliant-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Health Care Bill Will Put 1/3 Of US On Welfare</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/health/senate-health-care-bill-will-put-13-of-us-on-welfare/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/health/senate-health-care-bill-will-put-13-of-us-on-welfare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s a truly stunning number.  90 million will be on either SCHIP or Medicaid (not Medicare &#8230; Medicaid) if the Senate Finance version of health care becomes ObamaCare according to the Heritage Foundation:
But of those 29 million with new insurance coverage, almost half (14 million), will get their coverage through the welfare programs Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).  That is equivalent to adding every resident of Ohio and Nevada to the welfare rolls.
In other words, for half of those Americans who are being promised ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/health/senate-health-care-bill-will-put-13-of-us-on-welfare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Putin, Iran, Nuke Talks And First Strikes</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/foreign-affairs/putin-iran-nuke-talks-and-first-strikes/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/foreign-affairs/putin-iran-nuke-talks-and-first-strikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vladimir &#8220;Pooty Poot&#8221; Putin, with the opportunity to either back the words of Russia&#8217;s president that sometimes sanctions are just necessary or the Foreign Minister&#8217;s words of yesterday, chose to back the FM&#8217;s:
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin warned major powers on Wednesday against intimidating Iran and said talk of sanctions against the Islamic Republic over its nuclear programme was &#8220;premature&#8221;.
Putin, who many diplomats, analysts, and Russian citizens believe is still Russia&#8217;s paramount leader despite stepping down as president last year, was speaking after U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/foreign-affairs/putin-iran-nuke-talks-and-first-strikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So Much For &#8220;The Content Of His Character&#8221; In Baltimore</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/so-much-for-the-content-of-his-character-in-baltimore/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/so-much-for-the-content-of-his-character-in-baltimore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the mayor isn&#8217;t black then that&#8217;s unacceptable to the Maryland NAACP.  You see the present mayor (who is black) is about to be convicted of seven theft-related charges will have to vacate the office.  That has put the state NAACP in a low hover.  Apparently they don&#8217;t want the governor appointing someone that doesn&#8217;t look like them if that&#8217;s the case.  Marvin L. Cheatham, the president of the Baltimore Chapter of the NAACP had this to say:
&#8220;Our concern is who would the governor appoint?&#8221; Cheatham ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/so-much-for-the-content-of-his-character-in-baltimore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Why, Oh Why, Do Conservatives Hate America So?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/why-oh-why-do-conservatives-hate-america-so/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/why-oh-why-do-conservatives-hate-america-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugene Robinson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title is a quote from Eugene Robinson&#8217;s latest effort in which he indulges himself in another leftist &#8220;history began January, 20th, 2009&#8243; moment.  His ire and the reason for his rhetorical question comes on the heels of the announcement that Barack Obama has been awarded the Nobel Peace prize and the derision by which that was met on the right.
Robinson then spends the rest of his article taking pot shots at those who find the award to be a travesty.  But in the entire 700 to 800 ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/why-oh-why-do-conservatives-hate-america-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Islamic Radical Sensing Political Weakness</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/are-islamic-radical-sensing-political-weakness/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/are-islamic-radical-sensing-political-weakness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is all fine and good to have a discussion and even a debate about future strategy in Afghanistan.  But probably not 6 months after you&#8217;ve announced your former strategy.   For some reason, dithering has a tendency to be interpreted as a weakness, not a strength.  In war, weaknesses are attacked and exploited.  And that may be exactly what we&#8217;re beginning to see:
Several thousand foreign fighters have poured into Afghanistan to bolster the Taliban insurgency, the country&#8217;s defense minister said yesterday as he called for ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/are-islamic-radical-sensing-political-weakness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBO Says Baucus Bill Won&#8217;t Add To Debt &#8211; But It Will Leave 16 Million Uninsured</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/cbo-says-baucus-bill-wont-add-to-debt-but-it-will-leave-16-million-uninsured/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/cbo-says-baucus-bill-wont-add-to-debt-but-it-will-leave-16-million-uninsured/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post&#8217;s &#8220;Capitol Briefing&#8221; breathlessly announces:
A health-care reform bill drafted by the Senate Finance Committee would expand health coverage to nearly 30 million Americans who currently lack insurance and would meet President Obama&#8217;s goal of reducing the federal budget deficit by 2019, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday.
The bill would cost $829 billion over the next decade, but would more than offset that cost by slicing hundreds of billions from government health programs such as Medicare and by imposing a 40 percent excise tax on high-cost insurance policies ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/cbo-says-baucus-bill-wont-add-to-debt-but-it-will-leave-16-million-uninsured/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phantom Jobs Support Fake Recovery?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/economy/phantom-jobs-support-fake-recovery/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/economy/phantom-jobs-support-fake-recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Crudele alerts us to a GIGO (garbage-in-garbage-out) statistic the Labor Department uses and has used for a long time that provides erroneous data.  Bad as it is in normal times, it is even worse in bad economic times:
In 11 of the 12 months, the government adds massive numbers of jobs &#8212; sometimes more than 100,000 &#8212; that it thinks, but can&#8217;t prove, exist.
This is because the Labor Department uses something called the birth/death model, which assumes that no matter how bad the economy is, there are itty-bitty, newly-formed ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/economy/phantom-jobs-support-fake-recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>515</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>See If You Can Figure Out Who The Hypocrites Are</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/see-if-you-can-figure-out-who-the-hypocrites-are/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/see-if-you-can-figure-out-who-the-hypocrites-are/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to watch carefully.  The producer of this is kind enough to provide a few visual clues to help you with your determination:

Another &#8220;History began on January 20th, 2009&#8243; moment for the left.
(HT: Neo)
[Crossposted at QandO]
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/see-if-you-can-figure-out-who-the-hypocrites-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Post-American&#8221; President?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/foreign-affairs/the-post-american-president/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/foreign-affairs/the-post-american-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elliot Abrams, with a sense of deja vu, reviews Carter era foreign policy as one of weakness and accommodation leading to disaster.  He&#8217;s seeing some eerie similarities in the foreign policy the Obama administration seems to be fashioning.
One begins to wonder how far we will drift into a new period of generalized disaster. In Honduras, we back the Hugo Chávez acolyte and say we won&#8217;t respect November&#8217;s free elections. In Israel, we latch on to the bizarre theory that settlement growth is the key obstacle to Middle East peace ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/foreign-affairs/the-post-american-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain To &#8220;Remake&#8221; GOP?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/mccain-to-remake-gop/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/mccain-to-remake-gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve had the &#8220;Quote of the Day&#8221; and the &#8220;Headline of the Day&#8220;, now its time for the &#8220;Laugh of the Day&#8221;.
It starts with McCain campaign manager Steve Schmidt saying that it would be a catastrophe in 2012 if the GOP picked Sarah Palin as their candidate.
My question is compared to what?
John McCain?
Which segues perfectly into the laugh of the day &#8211; John McCain has decided he&#8217;s going to remake the GOP:
Fresh from a humbling loss in last year’s presidential election, Sen. John McCain is working behind-the-scenes to reshape the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/republicans/mccain-to-remake-gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Friedman&#8217;s Selective History And Left-Wing Paranoia</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/media/tom-friedmans-selective-history-and-left-wing-paranoia/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/media/tom-friedmans-selective-history-and-left-wing-paranoia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Friedman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=2005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know how else to describe this from Thomas Friedman:
I was in Israel interviewing Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin just before he was assassinated in 1995. We had a beer in his office. He needed one. I remember the ugly mood in Israel then — a mood in which extreme right-wing settlers and politicians were doing all they could to delegitimize Rabin, who was committed to trading land for peace as part of the Oslo accords. They questioned his authority. They accused him of treason. They created pictures depicting him ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/media/tom-friedmans-selective-history-and-left-wing-paranoia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic Self-Delusion</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/democratic-self-delusion/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/democratic-self-delusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love quotes like this because it gives you a little hint about the level of the left&#8217;s self-delusion and intellectual bankruptcy.
&#8220;A Primer on Reconciliation,&#8221; put together by Ken Strickland  of NBC at First Read does a nice job of explaining the arcane process and some of the limits that will make it both difficult and risky to push health reform through that process, despite the appealing feature that it can bypass Republican obstruction.

Although the &#8220;Primer&#8221; is quite instructive (you can find it here), the point of the post ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/democratic-self-delusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Kill Public Option In Senate</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/democrats-kill-public-option-in-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/democrats-kill-public-option-in-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that I&#8217;m complaining.
Max Baucus&#8217; Senate Finance Committee voted on Jay Rockefeller&#8217;s public option amendment.  No joy for public option supporters:
After five hours of debate, the Senate Finance Committee this afternoon voted down Sen. Jay Rockefeller’s proposal for a public option to compete with private insurers.
Though a majority of the committee’s Democrats supported it, the amendment was defeated overwhelmingly, 15-8. The proposal sought to create a public health insurance option that would set rates like Medicare does.
Now as I understand it, there are 13 Dems and 10 Reps on ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/democrats-kill-public-option-in-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waxman-Markey: 397 New Regulations And 1,100 New Mandates</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/waxman-markey-397-new-regulations-and-1100-new-mandates/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/waxman-markey-397-new-regulations-and-1100-new-mandates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This story slipped quietly under the radar last week as we had the UN speech, the Iran revelation and the G20.
An examination of the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade legislation finds it contains 397 new regulations and 1,100 new mandates.   And you&#8217;ll be pleased to know it will simplify your life, make child birth pleasant and cost you nothing.
Not.
But you can rest assured there is most likely something for everyone because this isn&#8217;t just about controlling CO2 emissions.  This is about more control of your life via the radical green ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/waxman-markey-397-new-regulations-and-1100-new-mandates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton: Obama&#8217;s Problem Is The VRWC</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/clinton-obamas-problem-is-the-vrwc/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/clinton-obamas-problem-is-the-vrwc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes friends, after an apparent 8 year hiatus, the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy has again surfaced.  Apparently it has been evident since January 20th of this year.  We&#8217;re sure of that because we have the word of an expert:
Bill Clinton says a vast, right-wing conspiracy that once targeted him is now focusing on President Barack Obama.
The ex-president made the comment in a television interview when he was asked about one of the signature moments of the Monica Lewinsky affair over a decade ago. Back then, first lady Hillary ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/clinton-obamas-problem-is-the-vrwc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminalizing &#8220;Choice&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/criminalizing-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/criminalizing-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What were the twin goals President Obama&#8217;s reform given in his speech to a joint session of Congress?  Oh, yeah, he wanted there to be &#8220;competition&#8221; so the consumer had a &#8220;choice&#8221;.  That&#8217;s become a Democratic talking point now.
But choice, apparently, doesn&#8217;t extend beyond the faux choice of the public option.  If you choose not to buy insurance, your choice is then reduced to a fine or jail  or perhaps, both.
Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) had a question about what would happen if a person refused to ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/criminalizing-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama, Clinton and State Department Wrong About Honduras</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/obama-clinton-and-state-department-wrong-about-honduras/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/obama-clinton-and-state-department-wrong-about-honduras/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honduras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we know the answer to the question &#8220;what in the world are Constitutions for if not to be followed&#8221; as we address it to those named in the headline, but we now have the Congressional Research Service weighing in on Honduras and it isn&#8217;t good news for the US&#8217;s policy toward that country.
David Freddoso reports that the CRS&#8217;s Senior Foreign Law Specialist Norma Gutierrez has completed a study of the Honduran actions as they relate to former president Mel Zelaya and they don&#8217;t reflect well on the US. ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/obama-clinton-and-state-department-wrong-about-honduras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why The UN Will Love Obama&#8217;s Speech (Update)</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/why-the-un-will-love-obamas-speech-update/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/why-the-un-will-love-obamas-speech-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that today is the day for rather scathing assessments of President Obama in the British press.  This one by Nile Gardiner.  He points out that the third-world debating club, known as the UN, will certainly deliver a standing ovation to their favorite US president in a while.  But, says Gardiner, we should understand the context of that ovation:
Obama’s popularity at the UN boils down essentially to his willingness to downplay American global power. He is the first American president who has made an art form ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/why-the-un-will-love-obamas-speech-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama OK, Democrats In Trouble</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/obama-ok-democrats-in-trouble/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/obama-ok-democrats-in-trouble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlie Cook, one of the most respected of the political prognosticators, continues to sound the alarm for Congressional Democrats.  Since August, Cook has been telling them they&#8217;re headed for electoral disaster in the 2010 midterms if they don&#8217;t change their ways.
Most of the erosion of support has taken place among independents.  Although the country still seems willing to give President Obama the benefit of the doubt, at latest for the time being, they&#8217;re not willing to extend that to Congress.  The threat to the Democratic majority in ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/obama-ok-democrats-in-trouble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obama In Over His Head?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/is-obama-in-over-his-head/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/is-obama-in-over-his-head/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of us who predicted that, we may as well keep quiet because when we pointed out all the reasons Barack Obama wasn&#8217;t qualified for the presidency, we were waved off as people not understanding his exceptionalism.
Barack Obama was the one guy who didn&#8217;t need the seasoning or experience most would deem critical for such a position.  Barack Obama was unique among men because he didn&#8217;t need to have &#8220;run&#8221; anything, or, for that matter have &#8220;done&#8221; anything.  A stint as a community organizer, a short time ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/is-obama-in-over-his-head/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s Political Atmosphere Is Like Dallas &#8217;63?  Really?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/todays-political-atmosphere-is-like-dallas-63-really/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/todays-political-atmosphere-is-like-dallas-63-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Boehlert destroys whatever shred of credibility he might have ever had in two quick paragraphs:
I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot of Kennedy and Dallas as I&#8217;ve watched the increasingly violent rhetorical attacks on Obama be unfurled. As Americans yank their kids of class in order to save them from being exposed to the President of the United States who only wanted to urge them to excel in the classroom. And as unvarnished hate and name-calling passed for health care &#8216;debate&#8217; this summer.
If Boehlert had spent some time in class actually ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/todays-political-atmosphere-is-like-dallas-63-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran, Nukes and Anti-Missile Shields</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/iran-nukes-and-anti-missile-shields/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/iran-nukes-and-anti-missile-shields/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IAEA announced, almost simultaneously with the US unilateral withdrawal of its planned eastern European anti-missile shield, that Iran now has the capability and materials to build a nuclear weapon.  Why did the IAEA come to that conclusion?
• The IAEA&#8217;s assessment that Iran worked on developing a chamber inside a ballistic missile capable of housing a warhead payload &#8220;that is quite likely to be nuclear.&#8221;
• That Iran engaged in &#8220;probable testing&#8221; of explosives commonly used to detonate a nuclear warhead — a method known as a &#8220;full-scale hemispherical explosively ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/iran-nukes-and-anti-missile-shields/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Try To Revive &#8220;Community Reinvestment Act&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/democrats-try-to-revive-community-reinvestment-act/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/democrats-try-to-revive-community-reinvestment-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many, myself included, who believe the &#8217;70s era Community Reinvestment Act was one of the key reasons for the financial meltdown we experienced since it required lending institutions to lend to unqualified borrowers.
Byron York reports that some Democrats in Congress refuse to acknowledge that and are now pushing to expand both the scope and power of the CRA:
This morning House Financial Services Committee chairman Rep. Barney Frank held a hearing on H.R. 1479, the &#8220;Community Reinvestment Modernization Act of 2009.&#8221; The bill&#8217;s purpose is &#8220;to close the wealth ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/democrats-try-to-revive-community-reinvestment-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise: Jimmy Carter Plays The Race Card</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/surprise-jimmy-carter-plays-the-race-card/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/surprise-jimmy-carter-plays-the-race-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Racialist Jimmy Carter plays the race card:
&#8220;I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man,&#8221; Carter said. &#8220;I live in the South, and I&#8217;ve seen the South come a long way, and I&#8217;ve seen the rest of the country that share the South&#8217;s attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African Americans.&#8221;
Carter continued, &#8220;And that racism inclination still exists. And I think it&#8217;s bubbled up to the surface because of the belief among ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/surprise-jimmy-carter-plays-the-race-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Punish Joe Wilson Or KKK Will Ride Again!</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/punish-joe-wilson-or-kkk-will-ride-again/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/punish-joe-wilson-or-kkk-will-ride-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You would think the Democrats would learn, but that seems to be something to which they&#8217;re immune.  I&#8217;ve come to believe that overreaching is in their DNA.
As you know, they&#8217;ve tried everything they know to do to capitalize on the fact that Joe Wilson yelled &#8220;you lie&#8221; at Barack Obama during his speech before Congress last week.  It was inappropriate.  Everyone agrees.  Wilson said so in his apology to President Obama.  President Obama graciously accepted his apology.
End of story?
Of course not.  The 5th graders ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/punish-joe-wilson-or-kkk-will-ride-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media&#8217;s Credibility Continues Its Decline</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/media/medias-credibility-continues-its-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/media/medias-credibility-continues-its-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll by the Pew Research Center for the People &#38; the Press shows the media&#8217;s credibility is at its lowest level since the poll has been taken (1985).  Skepticism about the truthfulness of the media is rampant.
The survey found that 63 percent of the respondents thought the information they get from the media was often off base. In Pew Research&#8217;s previous survey, in 2007, 53 percent of the people expressed that doubt about accuracy.
The AP points out that the poll didn&#8217;t differentiate between bloggers and broadcast and ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/media/medias-credibility-continues-its-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finding Racism Everywhere</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/finding-racism-everywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/finding-racism-everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=1044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to read Maureen Dowd&#8217;s column in full to understand how far the left will go to try to make any disagreement with this administration into racism.  They still believe that the political correctness they&#8217;ve attempted to impose on the country over the least few decades makes that charge into a magic bullet they can use to stifle debate.
No matter how tortured the logic, now matter how spare the evidence, and despite how much evidence to the contrary they have to ignore, if they can swing it, the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/finding-racism-everywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lt David Halderman Jr. &#8211; FDNY</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/america/lt-david-halderman-jr-fdny/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/america/lt-david-halderman-jr-fdny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Halderman Jr.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A post I did in September of 2006 for the 2996 Project, originally entitled &#8220;September 11th, 2001 &#8211; &#8220;We Lost David&#8221;.  It is the ongoing fulfillment of a promise made in the last sentence of the post.  This is what 9/11 should be about.
____________________________________________________________
Each week I do a tribute, called Project Hero, about a Soldier, Sailor, Marine or Airman who’s been awarded a medal for valor in combat. Those medals represent their actions above and beyond the call of duty. But, as we all know, valor and courage ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/america/lt-david-halderman-jr-fdny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN Tries To Spin A &#8220;Win&#8221; For Obama&#8217;s Speech</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/media/cnn-tries-to-spin-a-win-for-obamas-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/media/cnn-tries-to-spin-a-win-for-obamas-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good old media waterboy comes through again.  Immediately after the speech last night, CNN released the following:
Two out of three Americans who watched President Barack Obama&#8217;s health care reform speech Wednesday night favor his health care plans — a 14-point gain among speech-watchers, according to a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation national poll of people who tuned into Obama&#8217;s address Wednesday night to a joint session of Congress.
Wow &#8230; hot stuff huh?  You&#8217;d think that the magic was back and the silver tongued orator had done it again wouldn&#8217;t ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/media/cnn-tries-to-spin-a-win-for-obamas-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Previewing The Speech</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/previewing-the-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/previewing-the-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Frum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As expected, bits and pieces of the contents of the speech President Obama will give tonight before a joint session of Congress are beginning to leak out (naturally they begin to do so right after I posted my thoughts on what he must do tonight).  And, it appears, he&#8217;s going to go with his base on this one:
President Barack Obama, in a high-stakes speech Wednesday to Congress and the nation, will press for a government-run insurance option in a proposed overhaul of the U.S. health-care system that has divided ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/barack-obama/previewing-the-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dead Man Walking?</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/dead-man-walking/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/dead-man-walking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Ambinder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marc Ambinder takes sophistry and spin to a new level in a post at the Atlantic entitled &#8220;How Obama Survived August&#8221;.
Of course, for most of us, it isn&#8217;t yet clear he has survived August.   We&#8217;ll see how he does tomorrow night and what, if anything, that brings before deciding if he&#8217;s still among the living, politically speaking.
But Sir Marc drives on denying that anything that happened in August mattered very much and, discovering irony, throws this jewel out there:
Another irony: the public option debate helped. It helped by ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/liberals/dead-man-walking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Baucus Plan For Expanded Health Insurance Coverage</title>
		<link>http://rightwingnews.com/members-of-congress/the-baucus-plan-for-expanded-health-insurance-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://rightwingnews.com/members-of-congress/the-baucus-plan-for-expanded-health-insurance-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McQ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Members of Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightwingnews.com/?p=698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the culmination of a &#8220;year of work&#8221; by Sen. Max Baucus. And the cost?  Well much less than the House version if you&#8217;re to believe the Senators who put it together.  Instead of 1.5 trillion, this one will only cost us 850 to 900 billion over 10 years &#8211; another sum we cannot afford.
Why is this version less costly than the House version?  Well they&#8217;re going to tax insurance companies.
Yes, I hear you.  I know you know what it really means.  But for ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rightwingnews.com/members-of-congress/the-baucus-plan-for-expanded-health-insurance-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc

Served from: rightwingnews.com @ 2012-02-10 14:03:04 -->
