For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Breaking: Chicago Eliminated From 2016 Olympics
Written By : William Teach

Still waiting for a media link, but, Chicago was eliminated from 2016 Olympics consideration. In the FIRST ROUND! So much for the Rock Star presidents star power.

But, Barry and Michelle will always be able to look back to their tax payer funded vacation to Copenhagen fondly.

Quick update: ESPN has the 411. Not just the first round, but, Chicago was the first city to be eliminated.

Oh, jeez

The Daley Plaza crowd reacted to Chicago’s elimination in silence. Some members of the crowd were crying as they walked away. People blamed negative media attention on the bid and former Chicago Bulls star Michael Jordan’s lack of participation as reasons for the loss.

As Ed Morrissey writes, “Is that going to be the White House spin? It’s Michael Jordan’s fault?”

I guess Michelle Obama’s sacrifice was worthless.

Oh, and anyone laughing at Obama is a raaaaacist and should self ban themselves.

More: Brazil President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva celebrates, tells Barry “that’s for messing up my name and bumping my visit, champ.” Other Brazilians are goofing on Obama’s “yes we can” slogan.

Legal Insurrection catches liberals Blaming Bush for the Olympics loss.

Stix has 10 Reasons Why Chicago Didn’t Get The Olympics.

Oh, Lord, Newsweek is spinning this as good news for Obama.

Obama is incompetent.
mmmm mmmm mmmm
He can’t even convince the IOC.
mmmm mmmm mmmm

Posted by Kingfisher

 Heh.

0
  • BIG

    I just posted this off topic in your other post. This is great news. I hope that Rio gets it. We just saved American taxpayers billions of dollars.

  • gustn

    Will NBC say that it was all Bush's fault?

  • aharris

    It's a good thing our president decided to whore himself out like this; I guess that argument about how "everyone will love us" after we elect him was just as big a lie as pretty much everything else they tried to sell us.

  • William Teach

    I have a feeling that the IOCC was a bit PO'd about the presumption that Chicago WOULD get it because of Obama, and said "nyet."

  • aharris

    Forget how the people of Chicago are taking this news. I want cameras on our narcissist-in-chief. This has to be a devastating blow to his ego.

  • tblrk2006

    There was never a chance for chicago to get it. The intl crowd will continue to dislike us no matter who our pres is, and this just goes to show us how pompus the obamas are for even going over there. The real question is what did the MSM fail to report on while they were making olympic news out of nothing.

  • whats_up

    I just posted this off topic in your other post. This is great news. I hope that Rio gets it. We just saved American taxpayers billions of dollars.

    Posted by BIG

    2009-10-02 11:42:43

    Wow so you are happy that an American city doesnt get the olympics? My, my how far conservatives have fallen when they celebrate another country getting the olympics.

  • http://WriteWinger WriteWinger

    As a life long, born and raised, Chicagoan I could NOT be HAPPIER that Chicago did not get the Olympic games.

    Also – it was very nice to see that, when confronted with an election they have no change to throw ACORN, SEIU or any of their other groups at, Daley and Obama FAIL…

    RIO!

  • Robert_Ingersoll

    Interesting how the hate for Obama has leached off to Chicago and the Olympics.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    The whole involvement of Obamateur and the Olympics has been documented over at Michelle Malkins site. A lot of people closely affiliated with The One stood to make a ton off of the Olympics. Quid pro quo. In short, he went to Copenhagen to get his backers paid. Sort of like how he got GE their intro to Putin by throwing the Poles and Czechs under the bus.

  • GDR

    Well, the crooks in DC snuck one over on us – I didnt even hear it talked about on tv or Radio yesterday

    This whole Olypmic BS was just a ruse to distract attention from this group of crooks in congress stealing our Liberty!

    here is the link to about the only story I could find on what happened:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti

    This tells us the timeline we have for action:

    "The panel is expected to reconvene for a final vote Tuesday or Wednesday, giving congressional budget analysts time to determine whether the bill meets Obama's twin goals of significantly expanding coverage to the uninsured and not increasing the federal budget deficit. Reid then plans to merge the package with a measure approved by the Senate health committee and begin debate before the full Senate shortly after Columbus Day. The House also expects to begin action in mid-October. "

    Thhe story indicates that Lincon of AR and Snowe are still opposed to the final package and may vote no in commitee – the two need to be key targets

    Bascally, we need to set off a Hurricane of Protest to Congress – email, fax & Call now!

  • abcxyz

    I am surprised. I had assumed that Chicago had this in the bag and the WH had the early scoot which is why Obama was so busy putting his name behind it.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    And the left has faith in the One negotiating with IRAN over it's nukes.

    EPIC FAIL waiting to happen.

  • Mike_M

    I'm a fan of the Olympics, but there's solid evidence that hosting the games is an economic wash or actually negative in the long run. Host cities typically wind up with some infrastructure improvements and short term job growth, but the jobs go away and the improvements are wildly disproportionate to the costs. Atlanta saw the best results of the Olympic boom but even they essentially broke even aside from winding up with a new baseball stadium and public park.

    Chicago likely lost because of its status as Murderland, USA, and legendary reputation for graft that managed to sour even the famously corrupt IOC.

    There was no reason for Obama to so heavily invest himself and his office in the bid, and he's likely got a lot of 'splaining to do to the Chicago machine that expected to profit handsomely. Maybe this will teach Obama that the world doesn't bow exclusively to his whim. better he learn the lesson now rather thn when lives are on the line with some war or crisis.

  • redriverted

    I think Dave over at Ace had it pegged. It will be spun that it's Bush's fault and we have a long way to go before the world loves us again.

  • CoolCzech

    Clearly, all this is Bush's fault. He so poisoned the world's view of our country, it will take YEARS to repair the damage. This is just proof positive.

    There, Moonbats: I just spelled out your demented talking points.

    Did I mention Obama is a miserable failure at every thing he touches as "president"? Just wait until he applies his incredible, charismatic powers of persuasion to talk Iran into giving up nukes. That will be must EPIC, my friends.

  • CoolCzech

    I mean: how on EARTH could Obama put the prestige of his office on the line to go over there without even knowing in advance the Games were in the bag?

    Did he really think the professional Euroweenie America haters could resist the chance to piss all over the American President??? I mean, this laughingstock was thrown out in the first round of voters?

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    Look on the bright side. Obama still has a chance to lower the seas!

    ROFL!

  • aharris

    If they voted against Chicago because of its nasty reputation, then Rio shouldn't get it either. Rio is at least as dangerous, but probably more so.

    While in one sense I am sad it won't go to Chicaog because that would be close enough to provide me with a chance to actually go to the Olympics once in my life, I think it's about time that Obama reaps the rewards of over-exposure, pathological apology syndrome, and his own narcissistic character. Maybe if he becomes aware that he's not all that, he can settle down and concentrate on doing his actual job.

  • aharris

    Well, it can't be corruptiona and crime that sank Chicago because they just awarded the games to Rio. Maybe Obama just wetted the world's appetite for "historic" firsts, so the IOC handed Rio the "historic" first opportunity to host the games in South America.

  • Mike_M

    Rio has better hookers.

  • drothgery

    The IOC is insane. First they allow themselves to paid off by the ChiComms for the 2008 Games, then they go with London over NYC for 2012 to spite Bush, then they go yet another cycle with a non-US site for 2016. The Games have never made money in a non-US site (plus major US cities have NFL, MLB, and NBA teams which will use the major venues in the long run). The primary revenue source for the Games is NBC's licensing fees, which depend on good ratings in the US, which depend on events being live in prime time in the US (I guess Rio works pretty much for that, though).

  • karensp9

    Rio has better hookers.

    Posted by Mike_M

    BAHHHH HAAAAAAA Mike you made my Friday!!!

  • http://WriteWinger WriteWinger

    I think you folks are missing the real reason…

    the IOC is choc full of raaaaaaaaacists

  • D-Vega

    Chicago never had a chance. If New York and other major cities in the US didn't get an Olympics, then there's no reason why Chicago should.

    Other cities around not only need an Olympics more, but its only fair that the event is shared with other countries.

    Mike is right also. The IOC, being as corrupt as they are, must've had a gool ol time in Rio taking a "tour". Prostitution is legal there, after all.

    The only problem I see is that if Athens & Beijing had to invest billions for security, how much does RIO, a city which records thousands of murders a year, and where the police don't even challenge the gangs, have to invest before people deem it safe to attend?

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-10-02 13:27:25

    I'd say an amount equal to the US Deficit ie. the equivalent of several trillion us dollars

  • CoolCzech

    Ha, ha… Andrea Mitchell just said, "At least he (Obama) did well in the diplomatic talks with the Iranians!"

    BWAHAHAHAHAHaHaHaHaHahahahaha!!!!!

    Oh, did the Iranians just officially agree to disband their nuclear and ICBM programs?? Did I miss something???

    Just pathetic.

  • Rickvid_in_Seattle

    Obama again shows his, and more surprising to me, his administration's utter foolish naivety. Just as a good lawyer does not ask a question to which he does not already know the answer, no head of state goes into any sort of negotiation without pretty much knowing what the other guy knows and will settle for.

    Obama, first, should not have been involved at all. As President, the dignity of the office is much above this. Second, if he insisted, he should have gone there to accept the award he knew was already decided upon. Instead, he went to grovel for it and comes away with embarrassment for himself, the Presidency and the United States.

    A President who was not a naïf, or a knave, would have commented on a loss through his press office at the regular White House briefing. Now what is he going to do?

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    OK, I'm not an Olympics fan anymore – I think I stopped being impressed by the whole shebang back in the 80's. That said, I never really thought Chicago had all that much of a chance this time around. I thought that Rio had the inside track all along because they had to be the sentimental favourite what with being the largest city in a large up-and-coming 2nd world nation and all.

    Personally, I think it's a shame that Mr. Obama chose to get involved because all he accomplished was to impose the appearance of Chicago-style politics onto the already complex international politics. It was obvious to me from the moment he announced he was going there that he was doing so in large part to prop up some of his old contributors and supporters who stand to make a bundle on the land and development deals which would go down should Chi-town get the nod. The Olympics is corrupt enough without having to drag Chicago politics into the matter.

    Personally, I don't celebrate the loss of the games as a defeat for America, but rather as a defeat suffered by an American egotist who, in the midst of dealing with a large set of difficult foreign and domestic problems, thought it wise to spend his time and attention on what I saw as a lost cause from the start. That speaks volumes about his priorities and values.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    Other cities around not only need an Olympics more, but its only fair that the event is shared with other countries.

    Yeah, Vega, which explains why Obama went to Copenhagen to make a request on behalf of Chicago. Obmaa could have saved the trip (and the taxpayer money) and focused on Afghanistan instead.

    Wait, let me guess. You'll now claim that Copenhagen was a cover to meet with McCrystal.

    ROFL!

    Vega, your stupidity never ceases to amaze me. Obama is a blabbering fool and you consistently cover for his idiocy.

  • drothgery

    D-Vega, in the first place, who cares about fair? In the second place, the normal Olympics rotation is roughly North America-Europe-somewhere else-repeat. What we've had/will have from 1996 onwared is North America (Atlanta) – Europe (Athens) – other (Sydney) – other (Beijing) – Euopre (London) – other (Rio). And that's just financially nutty.

    I'll now predict by the time they're selecting the 2020 site the IOC board will be replaced by people more interested in making money than making points, and we'll get two US summer Olympics in three cycles. 2020 NYC and 2028 LA here we come…

  • CoolCzech

    Obama went to Copenhagen to apologize yet again for the United States. The IOC was so deeply impressed, it couldn't resist the opportunity to vote Chicago out of the first round of voting.

    Think about that: they didn't even do him the courtesy of keeping Chicago in the running for one extra round. It was an utterly calculated insult. And Obama reduced himself to the roll of a traveling salesman just so he could have a "kick me" sign slapped on his back on his way out the door.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    Other cities around not only need an Olympics more, but its only fair that the event is shared with other countries.

    Why didn't Obama pitch to share the event with other countries? Because he thought that the IOC would kiss his ass as much as you've been kissing it, Vega.

    While I do have mixed feelings, I am extremely happy that president Narcissist-Egotist-Socialist has been slapped down, big time. I guess the world doesn't love him as much as his marketing team wants us to believe.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    On top of that, one Obama's greatest strengths is his oratory skills and yet, he still failed.

  • CoolCzech

    D-Vega,

    Can Obama EVER do wrong, or fail, in your eyes? EVER? Even once?

  • D-Vega

    What the hell are you talking about, King? I didn't mention Obama anywhere in my post. Your hard-on for Obama is everlasting.

    If you want to know, I think it wasn't a good idea for him to go, but Presidents have made trips for things a lot less important than billions of tourist dollars for a major US city.

  • http://www.2008news.com jimg

    If Obama hadn't chosen to take this on personally – and it's open to speculation as to why he did (cough, cough) – he wouldn't be in the position of having to suffer the fallout.

    As it is, it's Obama (and the Mrs.) with egg on his face. Not Chicago, and not the United States.

  • CoolCzech

    Well, as what pointed out at AoSHQ, at least this should put all the Hitler/Obama comparisons to rest.

    Hitler got the Olympics; Bambi got the shaft.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    Posted by CoolCzech

    2009-10-02 14:11:11

    Oh man that is f'n harsh.

    9.7 on the Nixon scale. The only way to get a 10 is to publicly crucify someone for real. Harshest beat down possibly ever.

    /unrestrained golf clap

  • Robert_Ingersoll

    Bush part of the reason? Might not be so far fetched…

    http://tinyurl.com/wingnuts2go

  • CoolCzech

    Chicago got the least number of votes of ANY city – and CNN called it an "unbelievable development."

    Unbelievable?

    Really???

    Unbelievable that the professional America haters of the IOC – you know, the Eurotrash – voted against Obama in a calculated insult to him and the USA? That they weren't overawed by "The One" (mmmmm…. mmmmm… mmmmmm!!!!)

    Unbelievable that the room broke out into a huge round of cheering and applause at the news???

    Oh, Barry, you poor Idiot Man Child!

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    Posted by Robert_Ingersoll

    2009-10-02 14:27:45

    Thanks Robert. You just cost my secretary $5. Been waiting on a liberal to blame bush.

  • Bildo

    Maybe if Obama had proposed to sink all of the United State's aircraft carriers the IOC would have given the 2016 games to Chicago.

    For some reason, I think Obama would have happily agreed to that proposal.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    What the hell are you talking about, King? I didn't mention Obama anywhere in my post. Your hard-on for Obama is everlasting.

    I see. The entire thread is about Obama's trip to push for Chicago.

    I never stated that you mentioned Obama's name. What is hilarious is that you're trying to downplay the issue. OK, now it's "fair" that other countries share the Olympic glory. I guess you're now sticking to that lie, huh?

    If you want to know, I think it wasn't a good idea for him to go, but Presidents have made trips for things a lot less important than billions of tourist dollars for a major US city.

    Then we'll discuss those presidents' trips in later threads, huh? Right now, we're laughing at the stupidity of your false prophet. Nice attempt of deflection, Vega.

    Remember Vega, you voted for him.

  • CoolCzech

    What do ya think, guys?

    Did Charlie Gibson ever hear of the Olympics?

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    Bush part of the reason? Might not be so far fetched…

    Posted by Robert_Ingersoll

    2009-10-02 14:27:45

    By blaming Bush you're stating that Bush has far more impact than Obama. You're admitting that the policies of a president who has been out of office for over nine months still has more impact than the current president. That would mean that you're admitting that Obama is incompetent.

    Thank you for your admission.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    Obama is incompetent.

    mmmm mmmm mmmm

    He can't even convince the IOC.

    mmmm mmmm mmmm

  • CoolCzech

    On Drudge:

    "The Ego Has Landed."

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHaHaHaHaHaHahahahahaha!!!!!!!

    MMMMMM…. MMMMMMM…. MMMMMMMMM!!!!!!

  • LampofDiogenes

    I am curious why some commenters (D-Vega and Robert Ingersoll, in particular) seem to suggest that this is some sort of "loss" for America/Chicago? D-Vega mentions the loss of "billions" of dollars. All the evidence I've seen indicates that, with very few exceptions (Los Angeles and Atlanta come to mine), hosting the Olympics has actually cost the host city money. As others have pointed out, the venues are expensive, and usually have little or no ongoing utility (LA, to my certain, personal knowledge – I had family involved in the LA OC – got around this by adapting and using existing infrastructure as much as possible).

    I, too, find it surprising that the President would have risked his prestige on this bid without fairly certain knowledge that Chicago at least had a decent shot at getting the Games – to be dumped in the first round of voting does seem almost like a calculated insult by the IOC.

    One of the standard liberal talking points about Barack Obama since his candidacy started was that he would be popular with foreign leaders, and "restore our standing in the world." How do the liberals reconcile that with this outcome? The IOC could not have made this a more clear put down short of all standing up and mooning the President.

    This is what my teenage son and his friends would call an "epic fail."

  • CoolCzech

    Well, remember, LampofDiogenes, Liberals practice the New Fiscal Math: The more you spend, the more you save.

  • CoolCzech

    They should have had Letterman send along some of his Staff Members – they might have rubbed the IOC the right way.

    IYKWIMAIKTYD

  • Mike_M

    "On top of that, one Obama's greatest strengths is his oratory skills and yet, he still failed."

    He has other strengths?

    The bright side to this is that maybe Obama will figure out there's more to Presidenting than the ability to speak with a pleasing cadence and to spend other people's money.

  • D-Vega

    I see. The entire thread is about Obama's trip to push for Chicago.

    No, its not. Its about Chicago not being chosen for the Olympics. Maybe for people that are obsessed with all things Obama, it may be.

    I never stated that you mentioned Obama's name.

    You addressed ma as if I was talking about Obama, when I wasn't.

    What is hilarious is that you're trying to downplay the issue.

    I'm not downplaying it, I am treating it as it should be treated. Its only the Olympics, for Pete's sake. Chicago didn't have a chance. Its marginally acceptable that Obama went to Cope to pitch for a major American city. But he should have skipped it when he knew it was unlikely.

    OK, now it's "fair" that other countries share the Olympic glory. I guess you're now sticking to that lie, huh?

    It's not a lie. Its the same position I took when NYC was trying to get the Olympics. The biggest cities don't really want the Olympics.

    You are attempting to make this all about Obama, when its not. Stop foaming and take an Advil.

    Then we'll discuss those presidents' trips in later threads, huh? Right now, we're laughing at the stupidity of your false prophet. Nice attempt of deflection, Vega.

    Not a deflection either. I know the right is obsessed with sniffing Obama's ass at every opportunity.

    Remember Vega, you voted for him.

    Yes, I did. Who did you vote for, King? McCain? No one? Nice.

    In the real world, unemployment figures is the story of the day. No one gives a shit about Chicago not getting the Olympics, not even Chicagoans.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    Yes, I did. Who did you vote for, King? McCain? No one? Nice.

    Thats right. you voted for the guy that has both doubled the deficit from Bush days, he is on a roll with unemployment. He can't even get the Democratically controlled House and Senate to pass bills that THEY DON"T NEED ONE REPUBLICAN TO VOTE FOR IN ORDER TO PASS.

    Nixon proclaimed him a failed POTUS a long time ago. Sure looks like time is proving me right.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    In the real world, unemployment figures is the story of the day.

    Ever since January of 2007 the economy has started eroding. What happened that month? Two words, Pelosi and Reid.

  • CoolCzech

    No, D-Vega, actually the thread is about how Obama invested the prestige of the Office of the President of the United States in making a personal appeal to the IOC like some sort of traveling salesman, only to have them rebuff him in the most humiliating way possible.

    Chicago got the least amount of votes of ANY candidate city.

    The room erupted in applause and cheering when the announcement was made. Obama is an amateurish, self-centered narcissist that honestly thought his personal Oneness would make the Eurotrash love him.

  • CoolCzech

    No one gives a shit about Chicago not getting the Olympics, not even Chicagoans.

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-10-02 15:10:04

    Oh, I don't know 'bout THAT D-Vega: I bet Michelle's not too happy, ha, ha!

  • CoolCzech

    Oh well, on the other hand, Obama did say he doesn't care about Victory…

  • LampofDiogenes

    Interesting – I had no idea that the President's efforts on behalf of Chicago had been so extensive. This makes his failure even more of a calculated insult by the IOC:

    http://www.weaselzippers.net/blog/2009/10/obama-f

    I must say, the President's batting average, at this point, is not impressive. I'm hard put to find anything he has succeeded at. Other than spending too much of our money to no good effect, of course.

    I am also intrigued by the report that he met with McChrystal in Copehagen for 20 minutes. 20 minutes? I thought Afghanistan was "the right war," the war Bush should have been fighting all the time. Now, we are losing soldiers daily because our efforts need more resources and more focus. The President and SecDef supposedly picked McChrystal specifically so they could have a "new set of eyes" on the problem. He has made his suggestions (and they seem to me to be rather obvious, given the success of the surge in Iraq, and assuming the goal really is to achieve success in Afghanistan), and he gives the architect of the new strategy 20 minutes.

    This young man is clearly completey over his head. While certainly not the only example, Mr. Obama seems to be the most egregious example of a Peter Principle Presidency. He has been elevated far beyond his level of competence.

  • Rickvid_in_Seattle

    Posted by CoolCzech

    2009-10-02 14:11:11

    Oooooh, naaassssty, Czech.

    But I wonder, not being at all up on Olympics history, how DID Berlin get the 1938 summer games? I know these things are done years in advance, but Adolph and his pals were pretty well understood by the mid-30's. The Reich was not then what we think of now when talking about them, but still…

  • Mike_M

    "Oh, I don't know 'bout THAT D-Vega: I bet Michelle's not too happy, ha, ha!"

    Forget Michelle, Obama's got to answer to Oprah too. You know how much cash she stood to rake in interviewing athletes and imposing herself as MC of the Olympics? (By the way, we should thank the IOC for sparing us that at least.)

    Plus Mayor Daley just lost his retirement fund. The Olympics is every grafter's dream. Construction contracts, vendor licenses, merchandising…the possibility for kickbacks is virtually endless. Everything is rushed, millions of people descend on the host city, and when it's over the interest level drops to zero instantly. Obama may be disappointed but Daley has got to be supremely pissed off.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    No, its not. Its about Chicago not being chosen for the Olympics. Maybe for people that are obsessed with all things Obama, it may be.

    Interesting how you're trying to deflect the topic.

    You addressed ma as if I was talking about Obama, when I wasn't.

    I don't care. I just enjoy rubbing your face in the fact that you voted for an idiot because you, yourself, are an idiot for believing in his obvious lies.

    I'm not downplaying it, I am treating it as it should be treated. Its only the Olympics, for Pete's sake. Chicago didn't have a chance. Its marginally acceptable that Obama went to Cope to pitch for a major American city. But he should have skipped it when he knew it was unlikely.

    So even the mighty Obamassiah couldn't raise Chicago's chances from the dead, huh? How's that hope and change?

    It's not a lie. Its the same position I took when NYC was trying to get the Olympics. The biggest cities don't really want the Olympics.

    Tell that to Obama…and Oprah.

    You are attempting to make this all about Obama, when its not. Stop foaming and take an Advil.

    Getting bitchslapped hurts huh?

    Not a deflection either. I know the right is obsessed with sniffing Obama's ass at every opportunity.

    Then why did Obama go there? He hurt himself. Do you agree with that…yes or no?

    Yes, I did. Who did you vote for, King? McCain? No one? Nice.

    Your pathetic attempt to throw this back into my face won't work. I accepted Obama's victory back in November, why do you still talk about it as it is something new? Remember, you are the one who keeps reminding us that you won.

    Obama won which means that the deficit which he increased is all his responsibility. That is hard for you to swallow.

    In the real world, unemployment figures is the story of the day. No one gives a shit about Chicago not getting the Olympics, not even Chicagoans.

    Then why are you here discussing this issue?

    The Oprah is certainly upset.

    Dumbass.

  • CoolCzech

    Posted by Rickvid_in_Seattle

    2009-10-02 15:24:19

    Hey, how did Moscow get the 1980 Olympics? Beijing 2008?

  • aharris

    As I've read in other places: Obama spends all his foreign time running America down and portraying it as an armpit of a place. Why is anyone surprised that no one wants the Olympics to happen here?

    China at least did it right. They faked all sorts of positive, happy-joy-joy stuff about Beijing. It made China look like a wonderful place just long enough to grab votes (or at least provide no clear excuse not to vote for China).

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    No, its not. Its about Chicago not being chosen for the Olympics. Maybe for people that are obsessed with all things Obama, it may be.

    No, Vega. The real issue is that Obama personally appealed to the IOC to vote for Chicago and was turned down.

    The real issue is not Chicago's loss…it's the fact that president Hopey-Changey's persona couldn't even convince the IOC to select Chicago. If Obama didn't go to pitch for Chicago this event would be a mere blurb in some minor article.

    Dumbfucks like you have been claiming that the world will love us and that Obama will bring people together. In the eyes of the world, nothing has changed. Obama is a mere politician and his own ego (and yours) cannot accept the fact that he lost…..AGAIN!

    You bought Obama's lies hook, line and sinker and reality is hurting you big time. During the campaign you couldn't even convince us about Obama's qualifications without making yourself look like a complete ass. Obama cannot succeed at community organizing, how pathetic is that?

    I'm going to continue to enjoy rubbing Obama's losses in your face. Maybe next time you'll consider a candidate's qualifications over his political affiliations.

    Whoop-de-doo, I voted for McCain. I also clearly stated that I thought Obama would be complete disaster for the country early in the campaign and I was right.

    Again, how's that 'hope-n-change' working for you?

  • Mike_M

    "Why is anyone surprised that no one wants the Olympics to happen here?"

    They were probably afraid of getting blown up by Bill Ayers.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    Why is anyone surprised that no one wants the Olympics to happen here?

    Because we're all a bunch of eeeeeeeeeeviiilllll racists!!

  • CoolCzech

    It made China look like a wonderful place just long enough to grab votes (or at least provide no clear excuse not to vote for China).

    Posted by aharris

    2009-10-02 15:42:14

    Still, people should have been cognizant of the fact China is a Communist-ruled dictatorship that is systematically destroying the nation of Tibet and selling executed dissidents' body parts. But we of the West have decided to ignore all that, in return for cheap crap at Walmart. I was never a fan of the policy of trade with China… it was supposed to make us incredibly rich. How did THAT work out for us?

  • CoolCzech

    Damn, and Obama already appointed Blago as Olympics Czar, too…

  • CoolCzech

    I think this link says it all:

    http://minx.cc/?post=293135

  • CoolCzech

    Actually, this works better:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yA9Z8KEsNyo&fe

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    Kingfisher and CoolCzech are on f'n fire today.

    Well played gentlemen.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Wow so you are happy that an American city doesnt get the olympics?

    Yes, we are happy that an American city does not have to face crushing new taxes and disruptive construction and roadwork.

    Apparently you would rather see Chicago residents seven straight years of that. But then, you do seem to hate America an awful lot.

  • D-Vega

    Interesting how you're trying to deflect the topic.

    The topic WAS Chicago not getting the Olympics.

    I don't care. I just enjoy rubbing your face in the fact that you voted for an idiot because you, yourself, are an idiot for believing in his obvious lies.

    Its not rubbing my nose in it, because I really don’t care. And yes, you jumped to the Obama issue because of your (meaning the right’s) obsession with getting back into power.

    So even the mighty Obamassiah couldn't raise Chicago's chances from the dead, huh? How's that hope and change?

    No one said he definitely would. He made an attempt. The chances that Chicago would have won was nil.

    Tell that to Obama…and Oprah.

    Of course Oprah is supporting her home city. And Obama is supporting an American city.

    Getting bitchslapped hurts huh?

    Only in the wingnut world is Chicago not getting the Olyps somehow is a bitchslap.

    Then why did Obama go there? He hurt himself. Do you agree with that…yes or no?

    No, he didn’t hurt himself. He should not have went, though, because he could never have made the difference.

    Your pathetic attempt to throw this back into my face won't work. I accepted Obama's victory back in November, why do you still talk about it as it is something new? Remember, you are the one who keeps reminding us that you won.

    You were the one who mentioned voting, King, don’t get mad because your party is so pathetic. You accepted Obama’s victory because you had no friggin choice. Now you crawl into his ass at every opportunity, while your party flounders about.

    Obama won which means that the deficit which he increased is all his responsibility. That is hard for you to swallow.

    Not all his responsibility, but yes, it is on his watch. Not hard for me to swallow the truth.

    Maybe you should be more focused on that then the Olympics.

    Then why are you here discussing this issue?

    It’s important to note what I said, which was truthful and accurate.

    Dumbass.

    Stop whining like a little bitch.

    No, Vega. The real issue is that Obama personally appealed to the IOC to vote for Chicago and was turned down.

    So what? A U.S. President advocating a $20 billion boost to a major US city’s economy? Good. It was turned down. Whoop-dee-doo. We can try again. Get over your imagined victory.

    Dumbfucks like you have been claiming that the world will love us and that Obama will bring people together. In the eyes of the world, nothing has changed. Obama is a mere politician and his own ego (and yours) cannot accept the fact that he lost…..AGAIN!

    I never said anything like that. I said the Republican President was a poor leader. And that was true.

    You bought Obama's lies hook, line and sinker and reality is hurting you big time. During the campaign you couldn't even convince us about Obama's qualifications without making yourself look like a complete ass. Obama cannot succeed at community organizing, how pathetic is that?

    You’re foaming again.

    I'm going to continue to enjoy rubbing Obama's losses in your face. Maybe next time you'll consider a candidate's qualifications over his political affiliations.

    You do that. I know you cannot help your frustration.

    Whoop-de-doo, I voted for McCain. I also clearly stated that I thought Obama would be complete disaster for the country early in the campaign and I was right. Again, how's that 'hope-n-change' working for you?

    Working out fine for me.

    How does it feel to see that the right has to harp on every single little thing because they cannot position themselves as the better alternative?

    How does it feel to your party fails at everything they do, while the incompetent Democrats get stronger & stronger?

    How does it feel to see no leadership at all in your party?

    To see the in-fighting?

    To place all your hope on Sarah Palin, a candidate that has already lost once?

    How’s the mavericking going?

    Like it or not, 20 US cities could not get the Olympics and Obama & the Dems would still be a much better position than the Republicans. How's your nose feel being rubbed in the manure pile of continuous defeat?

    Have a mavericky weekend.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    So what? A U.S. President advocating a $20 billion boost to a major US city’s economy?

    D-Vega

    Lining his political advisors and supporters pockets with money from the Olympics. Only a liberal can justify that.

    Also Vega, with voting majorities in both Houses of Congress, why can't Obama get his bullshit legislation passed without Republican help? The Answer: too chickenshit to man up and totally own his disastrous legislation.

    And Vega, since Palin was not the nominee for POTUS, how did she lose the Presidential election? Koolaid make you blind or something?

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    while the incompetent Democrats get stronger & stronger?

    Oh yeah, the groundswell of suport for the Chappiquiddick Care is just going thru the roof, isn't it? What is it now, 45% for it and 55% against? What is going to be funny is watching Harry Reid lose his Senate seat in 2010. Maybe you can spin that as a victory for Obama, since Reid can't get anything passed with 60 Democrats in the Senate for Obama.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    No, he didn’t hurt himself.

    D-Vega

    WORLD REJECTS OBAMA: CHICAGO OUT IN FIRST ROUND

    Drudge disagrees with you

  • CoolCzech

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-10-02 17:04:49

    Jeesh, D-Vega… need to always get the last word? Much??

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    How’s the mavericking going?

    $7,000,000 so far. How is Hope and Change now, 17% unemployment and doubling the deficit in 8 months.

  • karensp9

    Did you guys hear how much this stupid stunt costs the tax payers? Apparently there were 3 trips: Hers, His and all the crap that goes with them. Unfuncking believable.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    Posted by karensp9

    2009-10-02 17:21:53

    And what about the carbon footprint of all that air travel? It's a crime I tell's ya, a crime.

    /sarc – I couldn't care less about carbon footprint.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    Posted by martinhale

    2009-10-02 17:30:15

    Oprah and Michelle, probably a rather large footprint as well.

    Woo Cha Wookie, as Jaba the Hutt said.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Vega won't let his guy down, he'll always back Obama no matter what until it doesn't matter, then he'll admit what a lightweight chump the man was. Obama got humiliated here while blowing off several major issues and a world crisis. President Bush got grief for responding to a disaster no slower than any other previous disaster in the last three decades, but President Obama's blowing off thousands of deaths from tsunami? Meh, no biggie. Didn't mean anything. The lack of action in Afghanistan? Bah, trivial. Nothing done to help the economy? Doesn't matter at all.

    The left is pathetic.

  • karensp9

    The left is pathetic.

    Posted by Christopher_Taylor

    Exactly Chris and to add to the list:

    UNEMPLOYMENT 9.8%: WORST SINCE JUNE 1983 … -263,000 LOST JOBS…

    17% rate including laid-off workers taking part-time work or given up…

    But why the hell should he care about this trivial stuff right? Tool.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    Did you guys hear how much this stupid stunt costs the tax payers?

    You know what? In the end, it was worth every penny to see that arrogant SOB get taken down a notch… and that goes double for his fawning sycophants, who figured all Obama had to do was show up and the Olympic committee would trample each other to be first in line to kiss his royal ass.

  • karensp9

    Posted by CavalierX

    CHEERS CAV!!!

  • http://www.2008news.com jimg

    The chances that Chicago would have won was nil. – vega

    That is flat-out wrong. Olympic insiders – you know, the ones who actually pay close attention to these things – predicted it too close to call between Chicago and Rio going in. With Tokyo clearly the weakest bid.

    In addition, there were pundits on both sides of the aisle predicting 'the fix' was in, or else Obama wouldn't have taken such a personal, political risk by putting himself on the line.

    The fact Chicago didn't make it out of the first round – and the fact Obama put his personal reputation on the line – is a crushing loss to a guy who's not used to getting his ass handed to him.

    Painting this any other way is simply naive.

  • aharris

    You know, if Obama hadn't gone to pitch for Chicago, and the press hadn't been so desparate to report on something positive the man did, this wouldn't have been more than a foot note.

    Instead, the president hasn't succeeded at anything, so every station was reporting on this live (even FOX) counting on having the good news of the Olympics coming to Chicago to report thanks, of course, to President Obama's masterful sales pitch.

    Instead, he (and they) were very publically humiliated by this.

  • Mike_M

    "all Obama had to do was show up and the Olympic committee would trample each other to be first in line to kiss his royal ass."

    I'm surprised he didn't bop down to Versailles since he was in the area.

  • Realpolitik

    Because we're all a bunch of eeeeeeeeeeviiilllll racists!!

    Posted by Kingfisher

    2009-10-02 15:51:48

    Well, you got that one right!

    But, what is most telling, is how much conservatives hate the United States of America. A loss for the country is a joy to the right. Why don't y'all just go and move some place else?

  • William Teach

    Yeah, we remember when you folks on the left wanted to cut and run from Iraq. This is just the Olympics. Which one is worse?

  • Realpolitik

    Yeah, we remember when you folks on the left wanted to cut and run from Iraq. This is just the Olympics. Which one is worse?

    Posted by William Teach

    2009-10-02 20:27:17

    "Cut and run"? We never wanted the illegal and immoral war to get oil in the first place. WTF are you an about?

  • CoolCzech

    Anyway, how come Mr. Pah-kee-stahhhn always says "Copen-hay-guhn" when it's really "Copen-haaa-guuhn"?

    What, he only cares about saying it right when it comes to people with cloth wrapped around their heads?

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    A loss for the country

    Since when is this "a loss for the country"? Does Chicago encompass the entire country now?

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Man if we fought in Iraq to get oil, we must really suck at this war and invasion thing. What kind of colossal retard still is clinging to that humiliatingly idiotic talking point still?

    Oh. I guess we know.

  • jasamc

    Why don't y'all just go and move some place else?

    Posted by Realpolitik

    2009-10-02 20:09:07

    Why don't you blow unwashed winos for a nickel a pop? At least then you'd raise your stature a little.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-10-02 17:04:49

    Vega's pissed off and whining like a little girl, AGAIN. Looks like somebody's upset that his Obamassiah isn't as god-like as he claims. Mmmmmmm, mmmmmmm, mmmmmmmmm!

    I'm not even going to bother to read his response because it's the same bullshit. Vega's anger and lies are catching up with him and it's SO….MUCH….FUN watching him lose it.

    My work here is done.

    Have a great weekend, everyone.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    We never wanted the illegal and immoral war to get oil in the first place. WTF are you an about?

    Posted by Realpolitik

    2009-10-02 20:32:46

    We kept telling Bill Clinton that bombing Iraq for the oil as part of "Operation Desert Fox" back in 1999 was illegal.

  • William Teach

    Funny how the majority of Democrats voted for that illegal and immoral war. Same for the UN.

    It is a cute talking point, but, libbies always forget to tell us exactly why it was illegal and immoral, after Resolution 1441, Congressional approval, and freeing 25 million people from a brutal regime that institutionalized murder, torture, mutilation, and rape. But, hey, nothing like throwing ones supposed morality overboard in favor of Bush Derangement Syndrome.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    libbies always forget to tell us exactly why it was illegal and immoral

    Remember the Liberal standard that once a Left-wing leader wins an election, he can do whatever he likes with no repercussions because, after all, he was elected by a democratic process.

  • Bill_Dalasio

    As has already been pointed out, for pretty much any major city, hosting the Olympics gives bragging rights, but in economic terms is a waste of time and money. This is a clear example of where Mr. Obama's failure is the country's success. Something akin to Rush Limbaugh's wishes.

  • Pingback: Tel-Chai Nation

  • Pingback: Tel-Chai Nation

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info