For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
The Right Side Of The Blogosphere’s Reaction To Obama’s Speech Last Night
Written By : John Hawkins

All in all, the only person on the Right that I found who seemed to like the speech was Bill Kristol — and he didn’t exactly heap rainbows, faeries, and fluffy unicorn bellyscratches on it either. That being said, it’s also worth noting that while the reviews were almost universally negative, they weren’t all that scathing either.

Obama’s Speech: Now Is The Time We Must Honor Our Returning Troops By Transforming The Country Into Something They Wouldn’t Recognize And Don’t Want. — Ace, Ace of Spades HQ

Aside from the wooden performance, there was nothing particularly noteworthy about President Barack Obama’s Oval Office address on Iraq last night. The President again evinced the impression that he viewed Iraq as a distraction, and he twice said he wanted to “turn the page” to other issues. — Conn Carroll, Conn Carroll, The Foundry

My thoughts on the speech? Petty, small, graceless, and ultimately irrelevant. The American people know what’s up in Iraq. This speech wasn’t for them. It was for the Democrat base that needed to hear the words “a promise kept”. The speech was a bone to the lapdogs.

The American people also know that troops will never leave Iraq–just as they’re still in Korea, Japan, Germany and elsewhere. American troops will stay there to protect the fragile country and to serve as a bulwark against Iran. It is also a nice, centrally located base.

So, the speech was one of those things politicians do. And it wasn’t even a good bit of politicking at that. — Melissa Clouthier, Right Wing News

Barack Obama again waited for Rush Limbaugh to go on vacation before addressing the public from the Oval Office. Like the last speech, this speech was, for three-quarters of it, dry and monotone — President Spock addressing the nation without emotion.

Finally, at the end, Spockobama gave into emotion and showed some talking about the troops.

Throughout though, the speech was a rather pathetic speech.

…In short, it was a pathetic mashup of schizophrenic campaign themes built up as an “Iraq speech” so the networks would carry it in full. The speech could be boiled down to “I love the troops. Cough. Iraq. Cough. Jobs, jobs, jobs. Hey, let’s go spend some more money!!!! Cough. Iraq. Cough. — Erick Erickson, Redstate

I really disliked it. Maybe I’m letting other factors poison my take, and I should probably sleep on it before rendering final judgment. But here are a few things that really stuck in my craw.

…If you read this closely, what Obama is saying is that not only do we owe it to the troops to rally around his discredited and partisan economic agenda (“It’s our turn”), not only is it a test of our patriotism to sign on with his environmental and industrial planning schemes, but that doing so “must be our central mission as a people.”

I find everything about that offensive. — Jonah Goldberg, The Corner

Why is it that this guy always sounds like a bloodless muppet when he’s discussing things that would move a normal human being? Obama’s supposed to be this great speaker, but here he was discussing what may very well be a pivotal moment of history, and he was plain old dull.

Speech Grade: D+. — John Hawkins, Right Wing News

Let’s just say I was “underwhelmed”. As a friend ask in an email, “where did the great speech maker go?” I can only contend that this speech was like a task you know you have to do, but really don’t want to do. And the results are usually along the lines of what you saw or heard last night. — Bruce McQuain, QandO

President Obama’s speech from the oval office, only the second of his presidency, was surprisingly limp. With three momentous subjects to cover – Iraq, Afghanistan, and the U.S. economy – Obama struggled to say anything new or interesting. It isn’t just that the soaring rhetoric of 2008 has disappeared; Obama is now affirmatively boring. — Paul Paul Mirengoff, Power Line

Last night, Obama delivered yet another mediocre performance in what should have been a perfect setting: a war speech as Commander in Chief. He had the ability to be inspirational and talk of a great victory over tyranny and oppression; instead, he praised the performance of the troops without actually ever explicitly thanking them for it and skipped entirely any notion of victory. Instead of being gracious and effusive, Obama seemed to want to tamp down any enthusiasm over the effort made over the last several years in Iraq, a curious position for a Commander in Chief to take. — Ed Morissey, Hot Air

0
  • RWNReader

    there seems to be something wrong with comments today

  • D-Vega

    Go back to the original, gray type, little window, comment system!

    • mightysamurai

      Agreed!

      Back in the day, we had to walk ten miles, uphill, in the snow for the privilege of commenting in a little gray box and we LIKED it!

      Not like today, with your fancy-shmancy “like” buttons and your high-falutin' “reply” buttons.

      The rest of you whippersnappers don't know how good you have it.

      • D-Vega

        We never used to have any problems with that comment system. It was fast, kept you logged on, and was cool looking.

        I tried to find an example but couldn't. But I did find some guy who cited an entire thread of ours from years ago about torture in his thesis for Virginia Polytech. He got an MA in Political Science.

        scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05012008-132116/unrestricted/brandon_kliewer_thesis.pdf

        Go to page 137-164.

        • anwatkins

          Hey Vega, hate to threadjack a little bit, but someone actually got a Masters by trolling blogs? Most of his research seems to come from looking at blogs about waterboarding. Man, I wish I could have done something like that for my degree. Alas, you guys don't talk about analytical chemistry enough I guess.

          Though it is fairly amusing that words like lefties, righties, moon bats, and a bunch of others are going to be preserved in published history. As are some of you guys in Appendix 4 and the text itself.

          Guess I got into the wrong line of work….

          Nice find by the way.

          • D-Vega

            I'm published!

        • mightysamurai

          We never used to have any problems with that comment system. It was fast, kept you logged on, and was cool looking.

          Yeah, I know. To this day I still don't really understand the decision to change over. I'm sure there's some complicated tech-related reason that made it sound like a good idea, but it's small comfort when I'm waiting there five damn minutes for one page to load.

    • TheDickNixon

      Vega did you find that missing thread you were looking for?

      • D-Vega

        Yes. It reappeared at the bottom. I thought I was going crazy.

  • baoxian

    Liberals should really be the ones steaming over this speech. Obama threw away what could have been a 10-point bounce going into election season because his ego wouldn't let him praise Bush, our allies, or acknowledge any kind of real victory.

    Imagine if Gibbs and company had hyped this speech into a national event, and Obama had offered the easiest and most basic of rah-rah wartime rhetoric. He could have given a line like “yes, I opposed the war at the beginning, and it was indeed costly, but in the end Bush and I were both right and our actions have made the world a safer place”, and hit it out of the park. If he had been graceful and shared credit, Republicans that tried to criticize him would have ended up looking petty and bitter.

    America loves a winner, and an Obama at least willing to wave the flag a bit would have worked wonders to bring moderates back aboard his rapidly sinking ship and stifle Republican criticism. Instead he botched it, further divided the country, and essentially sacrificed Congress all because he wanted to be a pouty little baby about having been forced to win a war he opposed.

    And to top it all off, the man whose only qualification to be President was his ability to give a good speech, can't even give a good speech any longer.

  • The Karma Hoser

    Anymore, President B. Hussein Obama gives speeches with all of the excitement and spunk of a dry-rotted piece of 2X4 lumber!

  • Art

    Not sure I ever agreed that Obama was a good speech giver…a good campaigner sure, but the thing about campaign speeches are that they are all about who can tell the best whoppers, and still be believed by a majority of the voting public.

    …And we all know there are no intelligence tests to determine who can vote.

  • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

    I don't suppose President Obama could make a speech which the right would particularly like, but he really doesn't seem as dazzling as he used to be. His last really impressive speech was the “thanks for the Nobel prize I don't deserve” speech, as flawed as the content was.

    • D-Vega

      He looks tired and was nervous. And the make-up was off too. Especially on a hi-def television.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Ed Klein on ‘The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House’

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info