For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Reactions From The People On The Right Voted “Least Favorite” By Conservative Bloggers
Written By : John Hawkins

On Friday, the Right-Of-Center Bloggers Select Their Least Favorite People On The Right (2009 Edition) poll was released on Right Wing News.

Intriguingly, some of the people who made the list responded and I found their responses to be quite revealing.

Here’s Charles Johnson from Little Green Footballs’ reaction to being detested by many of the very same conservative bloggers he had linked on his page a year ago:

Looks like I’ve replaced Andrew Sullivan as the most hated blogger, which is quite an accomplishment. I’d like to thank the wonderful folks who voted me the sixth most despised “right wing” figure, equally as repulsive as Pat “Hitler wasn’t so bad” Buchanan, and much more disgusting than Ron Paul, Mark Sanford, or Pat Robertson: Right-Of-Center Bloggers Select Their Least Favorite People On The Right.

It will be difficult, but I’ll do my best to live up to this honor.

So, since everything with Charles Johnson is “This person is a horrible, evil, bigoted monster because he knows this jerk, who’s friends with that guy, and both of them once linked to this guy, who’s really bad,” does that mean Charles is a vile, rotten cretin? After all, he did spend the last few years allied with the very same perfectly awful Christians and conservatives he now talks about with the sort of venom he used to reserve for Al-Qaeda and Islamic Jihad. Of course, that was when he ran an anti-jihad blog as opposed to a Firedoglake knockoff.

Also, let me add that the people who were banned from LGF should count themselves lucky because I’ve noticed that the people left over there are embarrassing. Every thread goes something like this:

“Oh Charles, you’re sooooooo wonderful”

“Know who I always agree with? Charles!”

“Charles is soooo smart and the people who don’t like him are BAD!”

There’s always a little bit of that, that goes on in a blog comment section, but it’s sad somehow to see one of the wildest, free wheeling political comment sections on the net turn into the political equivalent of a Britney Spears fan club. (PS: When do we start to see the moral equivalence posts at LGF explaining how the Israelis are just as bad as the Palestinians because both are run by religious extremists? It would seem to be the next logical step.)

Andrew Sullivan, who’s a few years further down the road in his transformation than Charles — and considerably more dishonest — commented as well:

They have an internal enemies list of conservatives who need to be expelled or disciplined for heresy. Top of the list: Olympia Snowe and John McCain, perhaps the two Republicans most able to talk persuasively to the center. (I’m disappointed I did so poorly this year; Frum is now the online conservative the base most likes to hate). Now check out the list of those the Reynolds crowd loves:

12) Ann Coulter 7
10) Jonah Goldberg 8
10) Newt Gingrich 8
9) Jim DeMint 9
7) Mark Levin 10
7) Glenn Beck 10
6) Charles Krauthammer 11
5) Mark Steyn 14
4) Michelle Malkin 15
3) Thomas Sowell 17
2) Sarah Palin 20
1) Rush Limbaugh 24

They think this will get them back to power?

Maybe it’s because he’s apparently high all the time (which honestly, explains a lot with Sullivan), but isn’t this the same guy who pretends to be a conservative? Isn’t this the same man who took the farce so far that he actually wrote a book called, “The Conservative Soul: Fundamentalism, Freedom, and the Future of the Right?” Yet he despises every prominent conservative in America, scorns conservative principles, and despises real conservatives. Sullivan is such a Humpty Dumpty. His whole political writing career can now be summed up by the words:

“When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.”

Last but not least, is David Frum from A New Majority:

John Hawkins’ poll at Right Wing News names the people on the right most disliked in the right-wing blogosphere…

David Frum tied with Lindsay Graham for 3rd place, just behind John McCain, but beating David Brooks. (Olympia Snowe ranked first.) Nobody wishes to be disliked of course, but at least the company on the disliked list represents a big improvement over the “most respected” list, which is headed by Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin.

See, this is why I find people like Frum, Conor Friesdorf, Kathleen Parker, David Brooks, Meghan McCain, etc., etc., so worthy of utter contempt.

Frum, runs a website called “A New Majority,” so one might presume he wants to a build a “New Majority” of some sort. Yet, look at the reality of what he is best known for doing: He attacks conservatives for the amusement of liberals. But, how do you build a “new majority” doing that?

Liberals have no interest in David Frum’s ideas. They simply want to use him as a stick to beat conservatives with. Conservatives obviously have no use for someone who drips with contempt for them — and moderates, well, being moderates, you can’t build anything with them. They simply don’t have the fire or the ideological coherency to build a movement around.

Out of this batch of squish “reformers,” the only one I have noticed who doesn’t fall into this trap consistently is Ross Douthat. I often don’t agree with Ross, but I at least respect him because he is smart enough to realize that if he is going to change the Republican Party, he is going to have to do it by bringing conservatives on board with his ideas, not by pooping in his hand and hurling it at the conservatives he doesn’t like.

It’s too bad that people like Kathleen Parker and David Frum, both of whom I used to like and respect, have turned into cute little trained circus monkeys for the Left, because we could have used them on our side.

0
  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    Anyone else notice that Charles Johnson's whiny high-school response bears a marked similarity to Liberal "arguments" when Conservatives condemn anything — how dare you condemn X when Y is also very bad! How many Liberals still scream that we shouldn't have removed Saddam from power because there were other dictators we didn't take down? Perhaps I'm wrong, but Johnson sounds like he's using the "defense" of pointing at other offenders, which never works.

  • RWNReader2

    Oh John, you're sooooo wonderful!!!!

  • RWNReader2

    damnit Cav! I was supposed to be first!

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Neither Frum nor Sullivan are conservatives, so they wouldn't be on any list involving actual conservatives. For that matter neither is Charles Johnson.

    Liberal socially and conservative fiscally = LIBERTARIAN

    Gotta be both to be conservative.

  • William Teach

    I was reading that Excitable Chucky post/comment thread when it went up with much amusement. I was sorely tempted to post it up over here, similar to the DU type posts, reminded me of the way some post by Kim Jong Il would go

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    They have an internal enemies list of conservatives who need to be expelled or disciplined for heresy.

    Yes, that must be it. It can't be that we just don't like you. Clearly it must be all a part of some vast Inquisition-like conspiracy.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    Sullivan has mental problems, caused by steroids and other drugs used in comabatting his HIV. Plus, he likes to spread lies.

    Charles is trying desperately to get a job with the Administration as chief blogger.

  • Mike_M

    Looks like the faux right is quite pissed off that they're finally being called out for playing their phony double game.

    Not so fun to be on the receiving end, is it boys?

  • Pingback: Excitable Lefties Get Excitable Over Obama Threat Poll » Pirate's Cove

  • Pingback: Stop The ACLU

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    That's what gets me, Sam. What's wrong with just disagreeing with some people? Why does it have to be a conspiracy or some kind of political witch hunt? Why does it have to be us pointing at traitors? That's just bitter childish talk. These are just folks we disagree with and dislike, nothing more.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    Sarah Palin shouted to the roof tops that Obama hung around with terrorists.

    And was correct. Thanks for reminding us of another fact about Barak Hussen Obama.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    We got shelacked.

    You voted for Obama. Who is this we you are referring to Hogground? You are not a Conservative. Just pointing out your outright lies.

    Here is a golden oldie from Hoggroung:

    I don't do it to change minds. Highly partisan political bloggers are not composed of people who are open to rational debate or having their minds changed. I don't do it to keep score. There is no designated unbiased RWN scorekeeper to perform that function.

    I post on RWN because its easy and fun to fluster political ideologues who are more obsessed with attacking the opposition than they are in boosting their own positive aspects. The vast majority of RWN OP's and its responders focus their ideological energy on the negative by attacking the opposition. Fortunately for me, there almost always exists in the real world examples of both sides committing the same types of infractions for which negative focused political bloggers attack the opposition. That is what makes many RWN OP's and their supporters such easy marks to fluster. I can almost almost always find a real world example of when the other dog got kicked. The leftist blogs are just as vulnerable in that regard. I've actually tried it. Its not near as much fun. The liberal bloggers don't get their panties in as much of a knot as do conservative bloggers when I infuse the "whoose dog got kicked" game into their partisan negative attacks.

    Posted by snohomish

    2009-09-16 14:54:29

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Posted by snohomish

    2009-09-28 23:12:23

    Shut up, hoggo. Nobody cares what you think.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    Posted by slobrainish

    2009-09-28 23:12:23

    I post on RWN because its easy and fun to fluster political ideologues who are more obsessed with attacking the opposition than they are in boosting their own positive aspects.

    Posted by snohomish aka hoggo on 2009-09-16 14:54:29

    Before you compose a reply to this well-known troll, consider what his personal mission here is, as stated in his own words above. As inferred from his own statement, he'll say anything to piss you off. Nothing is too outlandish, nothing is off-limits. He'll insult anything he thinks you hold dear, just to watch you fume and boil. He's here just to piss you off. And he thinks that pissing you off is great fun. Before you post anything in reply to this troll ask yourself a few questions:

    Do I want hoggo setting the tone and topics of my discussions here?

    Do I want hoggo exploiting my anger at him for his own perverse pleasure?

    Do I want to feed more material to this persistent lying troll?

    Do I care what hoggo thinks, says or does?

    If the answer to any of those questions is "no", and very likely they will all be "no's", then you know what you should do – just walk away and say "No response to hoggo from me today."

  • Mike_M

    "These are just folks we disagree with and dislike, nothing more."

    Not really Christopher. Sullivan parleyed his "conservative" status into regular TV appearances and writing gigs, where he slowly shifted to attacking conservative policies and launching ad homenim attacks against conservatives for credibility with his new bosses. Johnson is basically Sullivan II, but he never got the big media gig he's been aiming for because he committed the mortal sin of exposing Dan Rather as a lying fraud.

    These guys don't disagree with the right, they hate us with a burning passion and make their attacks in a bitter and personal way. Christopher Hitchens is in the same category ideologically but you at least have to give the guy some respect since he usually sticks to arguing opinion or policy in a civil manner. Hitchens disagrees, Sullivan and Johnson want to beat you and humiliate you. Big difference.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Sure, they hate us, but I don't hate them. I just disagree with and dislike what they do. There's no conspiracy to destroy them or some kind of enemies list, its just a list of "hey, who annoys you?"

  • Pingback: Connecting to the base ctd. | The League of Ordinary Gentlemen

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info