“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”

James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

0

Return To Free Market Principles

FacebookTwitterEmail If we’re to form conclusions based on the behavior of our elected officials, the United States government being over

2

How Obama Is Bypassing Democracy, Congress and YOU

FacebookTwitterEmail Phil Kerpen has a warning for you, America. He wants to alert you to the fact that Barack Obama

1

RO12 Film Premiere Review: Occupy Unmasked

FacebookTwitterEmail One of the things we were treated to at this year’s Right Online event, sponsored by Americans for Prosperity,

Share This

Share this post with your friends!