“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”

James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

14

Obama Tells Labor, I’m On Your Side

FacebookTwitterEmail -By Warner Todd Huston They gave him hundreds of millions of dollars for his campaign for president and for

47

Michael Moore: Big Fat Union Hypocrite

FacebookTwitterEmail With the spotlight on Wisconsin’s union thugs rampaging across the state, one wonders why it took propaganda filmmaker Michael

72

Incompetence: Obama Even Loses the Name of His Jobs Bill

FacebookTwitterEmail Texas Representative Louie Gohmert is a genius. He’s absconded with the name of Obama’s jobs bill — the American

Share This

Share this post with your friends!