“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”


James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Craig Newmark

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

66

One of Obama’s Biggest Donors Now His ‘Economics Adviser’

Last week President Obama appointed the CEO of General Electric, Jeffery Immelt, to head up his Economic Advisory Board. This

2

HOLY MOLY: 1 In 4 Voters Already Know Someone Who Has Lost Insurance Under Obamacare…

Last month, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the DNC chair, said, “you’re darn right” Democrats will : run on Obamacare in 2014. : Well,

11

Union Writing the Book on Intimidation and Violence

F. Vincent Vernuccio had a great piece in the Washington Times a few days ago revealing the the handbook written