“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”
Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.
It took a lot of guts to do what this young man did. They also offered him 20k in hush money. Fabulous. The proof in my opinion here is that...Read More
Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.
NoisyRoom.net Emperor Palpatine. Photograph: Allstar We keep hearing, from the saviors in Washington, DC, how government regulation is the answer
One of the things we were treated to at this year’s Right Online event, sponsored by Americans for Prosperity, was
So very true. People who should know better bemoan the economic means possessed by the 1 percent, but rarely do