“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”

James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Also see...

Craig Newmark

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

127

New Jersey Deli Outrages Race-Baiting Leftists With His ‘White History Month’ Sign

FacebookTwitterEmail A New Jersey deli owner has outraged the far left by putting a hand-made sign in his shop window

0

BloombergBusinessweek Serves as Soapbox for Hardcore Marxist Propaganda

FacebookTwitterEmail Life under liberalism requires reading cartoonish Marxist propaganda even in business news publications. BloombergBusinessweek explains the financial success of

6

College Course Teaches That Capitalism Should be ‘Overthrown’

FacebookTwitterEmail A University of Michigan “activism” class is teaching students that capitalism needs to be “overthrown” in order to fix

Share This

Share this post with your friends!