“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”


James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

0

Obama’s Marxist Social and Demographic Engineering of America

NoisyRoom.net Obama is now making offers to debt-ridden municipalities that they dare not take. It’s like the devil offering you

0

Obama Claims He Doesn’t Want to ‘Tax All Businesses Out of Business’

During a recent fundraiser, President Obama told an audience that he and the Democrats don’t want to tax all business

0

Donald Trump’s Reply to NASCAR and ESPN Canceling Events at Trump Properties is Awesomely Trump

Donald Trump has released a statement in response to the decisions by ESPN and NASCAR to pull events from his

comments

Share This

Share this post with your friends!