“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”


James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Trending on the Web
Craig Newmark

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

1

Unions Display Hatred in Union Derangement Syndrome

My Friend Maggie Thurber has a great piece chronicling the hate that unions in Ohio display for those voters that

0

‘Historian’ Gets Mouthy At Congressional Hearing

I meant to get to this last week, but “historian” Douglas Brinkley is so forgettable as a writer that it

7

NJ Unions Hiding Behind Courts to Continue Ripping Off Taxpayers

The next level of obduracy by New Jersey’s government employee unions has been taken. The Communication Workers of America, the