“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”

James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

9

AP Tars Tea Party Movement as ‘Grandfathered’ By Ron Paul

FacebookTwitterEmail In a story by Jay Root for the Associated Press, the news wire service tries to tar the entire

1

Smoking Gun on EPA’s Anti-Capitalist Agenda

FacebookTwitterEmail In the unlikely event anyone still doubts the Environmental Protection Agency has a collectivist economic agenda and is completely

64

Top Worst State Budgets: Unions Have Put EVERY State’s Budget In The Hole

FacebookTwitterEmail When you or I overspend our family budget and end up not being able to pay our bills a

Share This

Share this post with your friends!