“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”

James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

0

Green Car Recall: GM Recalls 64,000 Chevy Volts for Shut Off Problem

FacebookTwitterEmail Chevy has had nothing but trouble with its Volt line. Now another massive recall in in the works. Apparently

15

“What You Don’t Often Hear About Those ‘Greedy’ One Percenters”

FacebookTwitterEmail So very true. People who should know better bemoan the economic means possessed by the 1 percent, but rarely

3

ABC News That’s Not So New

FacebookTwitterEmail One of the breaking headline news stories online from ABC News just today, Tuesday, March 6, 2012 reads: Green

Share This

Share this post with your friends!