“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”


James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Trending on the Web
Craig Newmark

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

8

Obama: The Kingpin of Broken Promises

Well, let’s get the ball rolling on another broken promise from The One, Barack Hussein Obama, shall we? I mean,

84

Auto Recall: When The Wheels Come Off Government Motors… Literally

GM, Obama’s favorite federally owned car company, was thrilled to report in March that sales figures for the Chevy Cruze

16

Obama Says Gov’t Employees Not to Blame, Yet in 41 States They Make More Than Everyone

In a recent interview with Channel 4 TV News in Milwaukee, President Obama denied that government employees are responsible for