“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”


James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

36

Union Admits It Hates Voters And Loves Communist Imagery With Help of Dropkick Murphys Band

Proving that there seems to have been a good reason that in many eras of American history the “Irish Need

20

Obama Now Trying to Intimidate Consultants and PR Firms of Businesses

True to form, even as he says he wants to cut regulations, Obama’s regulatory army is marching hard against business

0

Thought Police: Employers Will Be Forced to Inform Obama Why They’re Firing Someone

Now businesses will have to go hat in hand to Obama to explain themselves about why they are firing any

comments

Share This

Share this post with your friends!