“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”

James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Also see...

Craig Newmark

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

11

Era of Obama: Number of Americans Renouncing Citizenship Soars

FacebookTwitterEmail During the age of Obama, Americans have renounced their citizenship at record numbers. In fact in four out of

18

About That Big L.A. May Day Parade… A BIG Bust

FacebookTwitterEmail Remember that L.A. May Day parade? It was supposed to be a big deal, you know? You see, there

2

Who’s Offering Economic Solutions?

FacebookTwitterEmail Given America’s growing national debt, now in excess of $15 trillion: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ A per capita government debt that’s worse

Share This

Share this post with your friends!