“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”

James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Also see...

Craig Newmark

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

0

As Teamsters Cut Pension Benefits, They are STILL Spending Millions on Liberal Politics

Facebook10.9kTwitter31Email1 Are you a Teamster who is now facing cuts in pensions and benefits? Well, guess what, Mac? Your union

1

Missouri’s Kit Bond Shows Why Politics Has No Soul

FacebookTwitterEmail Missouri’s Kit Bond is a perfect example of why regular Americans hate, hate, hate politicians and politics. It’s because

27

CNBC Declares Texas Top State For Business 2012

FacebookTwitterEmail Is anyone shocked in the least? (CNBC) Texas has done it again. The Lone Star State makes a triumphant

Share This

Share this post with your friends!