“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”

James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Also see...

Craig Newmark

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

0

Eating Their Own: Union Wants to Unionize Extremist, Left-Wing Media Matters, Website Owners Furious

FacebookTwitterEmail Started in 2004, the left-wing propaganda website Media Matters for America has been spreading lies about Republicans and conservatives

14

Union Members Take Hostages, Destroy Property: But Remember, Tea Party is ‘Dangerous’

FacebookTwitterEmail After months of accusations that it is the Tea Party movement that is somehow “dangerous” to America, much of

8

Left-Wing Union H8ters Update

FacebookTwitterEmail Today we have two examples of union thugs acting like, well, union thugs. We have two examples in Ohio

Share This

Share this post with your friends!