“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”


James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

2

Lisa Fithian: Teaching Radicalism to Chicago Teachers Union

Violent, union thug comes to Chicago to fake teacher “arrests” When people ask me, “What do you do?” I say

22

Hey, Liberals: Obama Lied to You on ‘Tax Cuts For the Rich’

Byron York assembled a collection of some of the many times that candidate Barack Obama told us he’d “roll back”

4

One Solution to Stop Some of Obama’s Union Pandering Labor Board Rulings

We’ve been talking for the better part of the year about how the Obama administration is using its powers to

comments

Share This

Share this post with your friends!