We know what the purpose is. To shift blame onto Breitbart and Fox News because Obama panic-fired a liberal racist.

That and it's a big “YOU'RE NEXT” to the John Hawkins' of the world who don't have $50 grand laying around to fend off frivolous lawsuits from government employees.

What Obama did is beside the point.

Releasing a video and accusing someone of being racist, accusing a woman who's father was murdered by whites, known whites, who were never brought to justice, of being racist, in order to attack the NAACP, is the point.

In a civilized society not-so-Breitbart's shenanigans are kept in check by the news media and common sense. In this “anything goes” environment fostered by republicans and the tea bagger movement, Not-so-Breitbart's antics are fodder for a complacent media. A woman's reputation was questioned and her livelihood was destroyed in the process.

Why are you so eager to make everything about Obama? Is it projection, because of the way the last administration manipulated every detail whenever possible, so you just can't accept that the transparency you see is not a cover, but actual transparency?

“ In this “anything goes” environment fostered by republicans and the tea bagger movement…“

Again with the sick sexual fantasy?

And anything goes perfectly describes how the Left went after Sarah Palin and her children. But you and your ilk had no problem with that. But when a Liberal has their own words used against them, why, that is just UNTHINKABLE to you?

I'll bet Breibart has not stopped laughing since the moment he heard that this racist cow is filing a lawsuit against him.

Wadda maroon!

“What Obama did is beside the point.”

But of course. For some reason nothing Obama does seems to count. I mean, why did Bush fire this lady anyway? What a jerk current president Bush is. Probably racist too (she's black afterall).

“Releasing a video and accusing someone of being racist, accusing a woman who's father was murdered by whites, known whites, who were never brought to justice, of being racist, in order to attack the NAACP, is the point. A video of a speech that is actually the exact opposite of being racist, a redemption speech by an incredibly strong woman, is the point.”

What about just accusing them with no evidence? Is that still ok? Because there are a number of democrat politicians who will be in big trouble if calling people racist without evidence becomes punishable. They're safe on the “calling people racist with evidence” front, as that hardly ever occurs.

Guess that redemption didn't last very long after her crazed rant claiming Brietbart wants to put black people back into slavery.

Scratch her phony veneer and she's a flamethrowing race-hustler just like any other liberal. She talked her way out of any sympathy on this issue, and likely her flimsy lawsuit as well.

“What is Shirley Sherrod going to sue Breitbart for?”

For defamation you ignorant fuck.

“Defamation law clearly puts Breitbart in a tough position. He deliberately aired a video that was edited in a way to put Sherrod in a very bad light. Breitbart even said on Fox News that the purpose of the tape was to show that racism existed in the NAACP, even though the speech Sherrod gave was precisely the opposite — it was about overcoming prejudice and stereotypes.”

God you people are stupid.

It is the tea party movement, not your term. I still haven't seen any footage of tea parties held against Sherrod. The tea parties are concerned with an over-reaching, over spending government. That's all. Next you'll blame the tea parties for the explosion of bed bugs in New York City.

The tea parties are the new Bush.

No, the video showed NAACP people laughing and jeering when she told her story you STUPID fuck. Sherrrod decided to make the video about her. God you people are stupid.

No, it didn't. Watch the entire video you teabagging idiot.

The speech Sherrod gave was precisely the opposite — it was about overcoming prejudice and stereotypes.

Fucking morons. The whole lot of. Teabaggers. God help us with dumb fucks like you voting.

The video wasnt supposed to be about Sherrod….it was about the NAACP. She could have been anybody, it didnt matter. The NAACP was proping up racist rants and activities and cheering while doing it. That was the message you ignorant tool. Its nobodies fault but sherrods that she was involved. And what did she do afterwards? Come out as more of a racists than ever. Learn to read and comprehend loser.

The video wasnt supposed to be about Sherrod….it was about the NAACP. She could have been anybody, it didnt matter. The NAACP was proping up racist rants and activities and cheering while doing it. That was the message you ignorant tool. Its nobodies fault but sherrods that she was involved. And what did she do afterwards? Come out as more of a racists than ever. Learn to read and comprehend loser.

God help us with dumb fucks like you voting.

haha……you voted for obama. Thats scrapen the barrel dude. Afterall, he is the one that fired sherrod before knowing why.

“God you people are stupid. “

Yet you are here contributing lies, falsehoods, shitty arguments, and nothing new. Why the new user name?

Defamation requires intent, you blistering retard.

Andrew Breitbart did not at any point accuse this woman of being a racist. He's said numerous times that the reason he posted that video was to show the NAACP members clapping and cheering for racist acts. He never wanted her fired, he never called for her to be fired, in fact he never said anything about her at all until after everyone else started calling for her to be fired and after Obama panic-fired her in a desperate attempt to grease the undercarriage of his proverbial bus.

God helps those who help themselves. That's why the Justice Department gave the OK to Black Panther members making sure no too much voting goes on if it's by the “stupid.”

Her charecter was not defamed. Try again, take time in between attempts to study the legal terms you are ignorantly slinging around.

Right? Because “it's not about black verses white, well it is, but its more about the poor verses those who have”

Not racist at all huh nutsucker?

Be a man, boy, and learn something. Sherrod and her husband are flaming racists. Admitting the truth about these people doesn't mean you have to stop fellating Obama in your dreams, blackspeak. This is you, isn't it?

How is her character defamed? She's a democrat politician who is a fan of the NAACP. Her racism was kind of assumed.

Sherrod is going to loose, she made the mistake of filing her suite in a San Diego Court. All Breitbart has to do is file a Special Motion to dismiss under the Californ Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Commonly refered to as the anti-SLAPP (Strategic Litigation against Public Participation) law.

The beauty of this is that it is going to force Sherrod to prove in court, without discovery, that she can prove her case. All Breitbart has to do is prove that he was engaging in a constitutionally protected activity.

In my not so humble oppinon it proves to me that Sherrod, besides being a racist, she is is also stupid, to have hired a lawyer who isn't familiar with California Civil Code.

California may be La La Leftist Land to the rest of the nation but there are laws on the books stringently protect freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Dear Peat Moss,
“Is it projection, because of the way the last administration manipulated every detail whenever possible, so you just can't accept that the transparency you see is not a cover, but actual transparency?”
Oh dear me, I 'm laughing so hard I'm crying. But not a you. Oh, no no no! I'm laughing at all the poor saps out there who are so unable to see all the transparent transparencies layered about our beloved O. Why, I counted at least four layers today while watching “the View”! Oh, if only those silly konservatives could see all the transparancy so clearly as we- for it is clear! And Transparent! And we can see it…. them….the…the transparency! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN!

If she were to sue anyone…it should be Obama pals at the WH and the Interior Department and the NAACP. Breitbart didn't order her fired..the Obamatrons did.

It's not new, this troll's been here for a while now. But it lied and said it was leaving, then came back a few days later. So fuck it just the same.

“What Obama did is beside the point.”

I would have to agree with you here. Obama is so incompetent he can't accomplish anything.

Finally, you're acknowledging the truth.

If you think that this is not about Obama I seriously doubt that you are a rational person. And get off of “the previous administration.”

George bush had absolutely nothing to do with this incident. He is no longer president. The Obama Administration fired Sherrod. Is that so difficult to grasp?

I would be willing to bet that you are a product of the public education system. (Without a clue about anything, but ready to spout the Party line when your button is pushed.) Sad.