Apparently, There’s No Such Thing As Natural Weather Anymore

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com

Premium Left blogad

Left Blog Ad

Permalinks

Apparently, There’s No Such Thing As Natural Weather Anymore

Written By : William Teach

Another day, another bit of raving, anti-science discourse and scaremongering by a climate alarmist. Let’s start out with

Heat waves, droughts, blizzards and the the rest of the year’s U.S. record-breaking extreme weather, likely enjoyed a boost from global warming, suggests a climate report.

Well, there’s a truly scientific word “suggests.” Can they put an actual hard value on that notion? I guess not.

In 1950, U.S. record breaking hot weather days were as likely as cold ones. By 2000, they were twice as likely, and in 2011 they are three times more likely, so far. By the end of the century they will be 50 times more likely, Meehl says.

How about, instead, telling us what the next few years will do?

Rather than totally triggering any extreme event, global warming just makes it worse, says meteorologist Jeff Masters of Weather Underground, a report reviewer. “A warmer atmosphere has more energy,” he says, contributing to heat waves, tornadoes and other extremes. Even heavy blizzards come from an atmosphere packed with extra moisture by global warming he adds. “Years like 2011 may be the new normal.”

I “suggest” that the next inter-glaciation will be caused by globull warming. Now you have to prove me wrong. But, you can’t because I’ve set up conditions that make it impossible. Now, give me a $4 million grant.

Anyhow, here we go

“There’s really no such thing as natural weather anymore,” says climate scientist Donald Wuebbles of the University of Illinois, who was not involved with the report, but said he largely agreed with its conclusions. “Anything that takes place today in the weather system has been affected by the changes we’ve made to the climate system. That’s just the background situation and it’s good for people to know that,” Wuebbles says. Although scientists cannot immediately tie what percentage of an extreme weather event relies on global warming to make it more severe, he says. “It’s always a factor in today’s world.”

So, if the wind blows, it’s because someone in Durban drove a fossil fueled vehicle on the way to the IPCC conference.

Steven Goddard points out that 100 years ago, they blamed it on wireless communications. And, hey, didn’t they used to blame any change in the weather on witches? Me, I blame zombies. As they decay, they release lots of methane.

Anonymous

So they’ve given up on the more extreme predictions.

That’s a start.

From now on it will simply be all weather is caused by global warming. Which gives them some wiggle room when none of their predictions come true but they shoot themselves in the foot because people won’t be willing to sacrifice their standard of living and freedoms to fight off weather that is merely on the outside edge of normal.

So I think this effort to cover up for their past lies will backfire. It will be impossible to disprove (which means it isn’t science, but that’s another discussion) BUT it also won’t generate the necessary hysteria.
Anonymous

After 30 seconds of exhaustive research, I have the answer.

When Ben Franklin came up with the lightning rod idea, he doomed the earth. All that electricity running into the earth can’t be contained for eternity. As it discharges, it creates volcanoes, hurricanes, tornadoes, heatwaves, cold snaps, and causes your Cheerios to become soggy before you can finish them. The particular type of chaos these discharges cause depends on the discharge point’s geographical and geological makeup.

I don’t have a research grant application ready but do accept cash donations via PayPal.

TheDarkKnight

As fate would have it I am an expert in genealogical research…

This evening I managed to pull some old birth and marriage records and, lo’ and behold, I found out that Ben Franklin is the illegitimate great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-Grandfather of none other than:

George W. Bush

/sarcasm-off

Anonymous

Let’s just take this at face value, shall we? And as the climate has continued to warm, the human population has increased, the area of habitable and productive land has increased, the food supply continues to increase, and the average human standard of living continues to increase.

This is bad why, exactly?

Anonymous

If humans are the problem in your eyes that’s a terrible thing.

They may be able to tolerate us living in squalor and slavery, but certainly not as wealthy independent individuals.

JoeBrit

I was going to ask for references and links to these claims, but then Perry has apparently reviewed the evidence in his book, Fed Up. So can we at least have a few quotes?

http://profiles.google.com/oatscarter Oats Carter

What ever happened to the consensus being right?

Anonymous

Don’t ask the bitch to be consistent. Leftists are very good at doublethink.

TheDarkKnight

Correction.. they are double plus good at doublethink…

Still working with the 9th volume of the NewSpeak dictionary?

I’ve got a copy of the 10th edition if you’re interested…
TheDarkKnight

Correction.. they are double plus good at doublethink…

Still working with the 9th volume of the NewSpeak dictionary?

I’ve got a copy of the 10th edition if you’re interested…
TheDarkKnight

Correction.. they are double plus good at doublethink…

Still working with the 9th volume of the NewSpeak dictionary?

I’ve got a copy of the 10th edition if you’re interested…

JoeBrit

Texas sets record for hottest summer in US
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44441386/ns/weather/

Say it’s not so. It’s unnatural. Where’s Stephen King?
JoeBrit

Texas sets record for hottest summer in US
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44441386/ns/weather/

Say it’s not so. It’s unnatural. Where’s Stephen King?

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Prove that one season is a trend and was caused by anything man has done, Slow Joe.

Martha

Step outside, dishboy – on your break.

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Prove that one season is a trend and was caused by anything man has done, Slow Joe.
Anonymous

Worst drought/heat wave in 75 years!

Clearly this proves manmade global warming!

/just don’t ask why it was so hot/dry 75 years ago when carbon levels were so low compared to today.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Meanwhile in other parts of the country, they’re having record lows. Which proves… we’re facing weather.

Anonymous

No no! You see, those record low temperatures also prove global warming! Because…uh…I forget. But I’m sure it proves global warming somehow!

Martha

Yeh – they ain’t liking this one bit.
Jfisher17

“Hottest summer…” Temperature records go back about 150 years. The earth is about 4.5 billion years old. I don’t know the math, but 150 is to 4.5 billion as…..you know. It means nothing. It means less than nothing. Pretty good chance it was even hotter somewhere back in those other 4 billion years, you think, Joe? So what caused it?

TheDarkKnight

Dinosaur flatulence, duh….

Anonymous

OMFG you mean to tell me it’s hot in Texas, IN THE SUMMER? AAHHHHHHH! The sky is falling!!!

Fucking choad.

Anonymous

I have noticed that the snow skiing situation around houston was particularly bad this year.

Is this global warming (and thus Bushs) fault? Can’t say. But probably yes.

Anonymous

OMFG you mean to tell me it’s hot in Texas, IN THE SUMMER? AAHHHHHHH! The sky is falling!!!

Fucking choad.

Anonymous

Teach, make all the fun you want about globull warming, but you will “never live down” your flawed “ice cube in the glass” experiment to prove that melting glaciers will not cause a rise in sea levels. I know that you already have been lectured on your flawed experiment in the past, but in case you forgot, you should have first marked the water level in your glass, dropped the ice cubes in the glass, and then observed the change in water level.

PS, Teach sorry to rub your flawed, full of bull experiment in again.

PS2, Teach, have you even looked at some of the material in the links I gave you in the past, for example, realclimate.org, skeptical science.com, thinkprogrss.org, climate.nasa.gov, scienceofdoom.com, etc. Even Roy Spencer, a well known scientific critic of global warming has a nice explanation of the so-called atmospheric greenhouse effect in his website. Spencer ‘s main critism of CO2 induced warming is that the climate is not as sensitive as claimed due to negative feedback from increased cloud cover. At least Spencer, Lindzen and the other critics with a backround in climate science don’t use the typical anti global warming arguments, such as the climate has alwys changed, CO2 is only a trace gas, it’s the sun, and on and on.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Tell us all again how the hockey stick graph is still valid despite leaving off massive warming periods in the past and being utterly wrong in predicting warming in its future.
Anonymous

you should have first marked the water level in your glass, dropped the ice cubes in the glass, and then observed the change in water level.

And this “revised” experiment is supposed to prove…what exactly? The ice is already in the ocean. It’s not going to magically drop into the ocean as a result of globull warming.

Anonymous

Apparently their models require ice be generated from nothing and deposited in the ocean to melt.

Not sure how that works what with the basic laws of physics saying that can’t happen.

But with enough funding even physics can be overturned!
Anonymous

Apparently their models require ice be generated from nothing and deposited in the ocean to melt.

Not sure how that works what with the basic laws of physics saying that can’t happen.

But with enough funding even physics can be overturned!

TheDarkKnight

How about taking into account the natural evaporation cycle?

How about all the studies that have shown that any increase in CO2 emissions is offset through the natural consumption of that CO2 by plant life?

You do know what the number one “greenhouse gas” is according to scientific data don’t you?

Water vapor…

What’s next? A ban on di-hydrogen oxide?

Douchebag…