For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
GOP Makes Obama Look Good
Written By : Roger Simon

The Republican field debated for the 19th time Thursday night, and once again, the media promised us it was going to be a “make or break” event.

Don’t believe the media.

The media say the debates have been the most critical factor in the nominating race so far because the media have been forced to watch them all. And take notes. And write stories.

And we want someone to share our pain: Someone like you.

Having done my duty and paid attention to all of the debates, and since we do not have another debate scheduled until Feb. 22, I will announce my conclusion now:

These debates are making the Obama staffers in Chicago so giddy that after each one they are tearing off their clothes, running through Millennium Park and howling at the moon.

And why shouldn’t they? The American people, after being treated to hour upon hour of Republican candidates being allowed to say pretty much whatever they want, are slowly discovering something: Barack Obama doesn’t look that bad anymore.

An NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll released Wednesday said that “for the first time in six months, more people approve of the job the president is doing than disapprove.”

Sure, the president’s approval/disapproval figure is only 48-46, but he has achieved that after six months of solid Republican debating. After six months of attack. After six months of being told that the American economy is doomed without a steady Republican hand on the tiller of state.

So what else does the poll show? “More people said they believe the economy will get better (37 percent) in the next year rather than worse (17 percent). That’s the highest level in more than a year and a seven-point jump over last month.”

Oh, my. This is not what the Republicans had in mind.

The debates were supposed to winnow the field and leave the strongest Republican standing. It is all very Darwinian: the survival of the fittest. (Even though some Republicans don’t believe in evolution, just about all of them believe in survival of the fittest. That’s because they believe they are the fittest.)

True, the number of lecterns on the stage has been winnowed from nine to four, but what have the “fittest” Republicans been telling America about their agenda?

Well, Thursday night, we had a good, long talk about America’s moon colony. What moon colony? Fair question. America currently lacks a moon colony. But Newt Gingrich would like a moon colony, and it won’t even cost a lot if we offer a “prize” to people to build one. As he once again reminded America, “Lindberg flew to Paris for a $25,000 prize.”

Newt says we have to have a moon colony because, if we don’t, the Chinese will have a moon colony, and if that happens, well, it will be bad.

But Mitt Romney said a moon colony could cost $1 trillion. So how big would the prize have to be to get people to compete for building the moon colony? More than $1 trillion, I would guess. And where would the U.S. government get that kind of money? We would have to borrow it from the Chinese. Who could just hold onto it and build their own moon colony.

Do you see now why Obama is doing better in the polls?

Not that we are supposed to spend our time worrying about the substance of these debates. That is for professional fact-checkers. (Don’t ask me who fact-checks the fact-checkers. You don’t want to know.)

Instead, the media decide who wins and who loses, who gets made and who gets broken. Looking for the little things help me decide.

Which is why my notes begin: “National Anthem. All put hands on hearts. Santorum and Mitt sing. Newt and Ron Paul don’t. Why?”

I don’t know. I am waiting for a fact-checker to tell me.

Further notes: “Newt praises Callista for playing French horn. Have words ‘French horn’ ever been spoken at political debate before? Unlikely, but not impossible. Especially if debate were in France.”

“When asked by Santorum if people in Massachusetts must buy health care, Mitt replies, ‘First of all, it’s not worth getting angry about.’ Presidency pays only $400,000 a year. So why would Romney get emotional about it?”

“Debate supposed to be Newt’s best opportunity to win Florida, but at one point he says, ‘Gov. Romney is exactly right’ and at another he says, ‘I agree with Gov. Romney.’ Newt appears to be lacking in mindless aggression. This is no way to win a debate.”

The debate wandered back and forth and finally ended up with CNN moderator Wolf Blitzer asking the candidates, “Why are you the one person on this stage most likely to beat Barack Obama?”

My notes say that Ron Paul cited his “freedom message,” that Santorum said he could win Reagan Democrats and that Romney said America needs “dramatic, fundamental, extraordinary” change.

Newt, I note, said, “This is a big choice election.”

But he didn’t say the choice was standing on the stage.

0
  • Anonymous

    Ron Paul is smeared in the media because virtually every newspaper or magazine is owned by Jews. Their self-serving propaganda constantly fills the TV screen. The Federal government and Federal Reserve is totally under Jewish control. US military forces are the pawn of Israel. The banks, the markets are theirs. They systematically denigrate our Founding Fathers and our heritage and our Constitution.

    • Martin Hale

      Boy-howdy – antisemitism like that is going have our resident Judiophobe fully erect and foaming with delight.

    • Daytrip

      Ron Paul is smeared because he wrote the newsletter “Blame the Darkies” and some of his supporters are crazy anti-jew 9/11 truthers. Can’t think of any anti-semites off the top of my head but since this thread mentions Ron Paul, I’m sure one will show up. Oh… nevermind.

    • JoeBritton

      What is surprising, perhaps not, is that this hit-and-run trollish piece of obvious right wing anti-Semitism has not been deleted by the administrators. Are they letting it stand for a reason? Is it perhaps the preference of Jewish Americans to vote for Democrats, the party of tolerance and equality, subliminal hatred of Jews?

      Before RWN embarrasses itself, someone needs to take action.

      • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

        Is that what a troll trolling a troll looks like? Hot dog!

      • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

        Is that what a troll trolling a troll looks like? Hot dog!

        • Toastrider

          I’m sure I’ve got trollface.jpg around in my computer somewhere.

      • Martin Hale

        Shergald, why would the mods take down this comment when they leave so many of your heavily nuanced antisemitic comments alone?

        Seems like they’re just being consistent.

        • Anonymous

          Sherdumb’s just upset because someone stole his gimmick.

        • JoeBritton

          None my comments have ever been antiSemitic, unless you believe that criticism of Israel of its treatment of the Palestinians, or advocacy of Palestinian freedom, self-determination, and justice are nuanced antiSemitism. That canard only resurfaces when an ignorant person speaks or when someone lacking compassion or even basic democratic values blows his whistle as you just did.

          In your case, I glad you have stopped following me around. Get some friends, for cripes sake.

          • Anonymous

            In your mind anyone who supports Israel’s right to exist is a right-wing Likudnik and a shill for AIPAC. Therefore, anyone who believes the opposite is an anti-semite.

            Don’t like it? Tough.

          • Anonymous

            In your mind anyone who supports Israel’s right to exist is a right-wing Likudnik and a shill for AIPAC. Therefore, anyone who believes the opposite is an anti-semite.

            Don’t like it? Tough.

          • Martin Hale

            To make this easy for you to grasp, I’m going couch this reply in your own pet phrases and tactics, You’ll recognise them as I apply them.  There are three ‘Shergaldisms’ in this reply – can you find all three?

            Your antisemitism is communicated via code words.  Just as you see racism in things people say which clearly aren’t racist, and you label them ‘code words’ for racism, most of us see your deeply-held opposition to and enmity toward a free Jewish state in the Middle East in the ‘code words’ you use whenever the subject comes up. 

            The way your comments differ from the original overtly antisemitic comment to which you responded is that you you’re more subtle and nuanced in your anti-semitism.  You code your antipathy for Jews into broadsides about Zionism and other anti-Israeli rhetoric.  But most of us can see that for what it is – code words for “I support the people who would destroy Israel given half a chance.”

            As mighty points out, you label anyone who believes a Jewish state has a right to exist a radical Islamophobe and a Zionist.  But to protect yourself from charges of antisemitism, you engage in the deceptive pretext of agreeing Israel has a right to exist, but then finding that everything they do to ensure that existence is wrong, evil and anti-Islam.

            And that, my dogmatic ideologue friend, is intellectualised, highly rationalised and nuanced antisemitism – to coin one of your stupid “-ophobia” words – let’s call it Judiophobia.

            It comes straight from your proclivity to stereotype and generalise people into neat groups which you can then use to demonise them as individuals.  We hear if from you every day – all conservatives are evil, all Republicans are evil, all Israel supporters are evil, all people who question Al Gore are evil, etc.  A broken freakin’ record of the politics of group and class warfare.  You rarely deal with people as individuals, you treat them as representative of a group in order that that you can apply your hatred of that group to them as an individual.  Reading your mewlings is very much like watching Two Minutes Hate.on the telescreen, if you get the reference.

            Go ahead and proffer up your pro forma denial.  I know I’m expecting it.  But regardless of your denials, your actions tell a much different story.  After commenting here for as long as you have, most everyone has had ample chance to observe your long-standing antipathy toward a free Jewish state in the Middle East.  As you often say, “it’s duly noted”.

          • Martin Hale

            To make this easy for you to grasp, I’m going couch this reply in your own pet phrases and tactics, You’ll recognise them as I apply them.  There are three ‘Shergaldisms’ in this reply – can you find all three?

            Your antisemitism is communicated via code words.  Just as you see racism in things people say which clearly aren’t racist, and you label them ‘code words’ for racism, most of us see your deeply-held opposition to and enmity toward a free Jewish state in the Middle East in the ‘code words’ you use whenever the subject comes up. 

            The way your comments differ from the original overtly antisemitic comment to which you responded is that you you’re more subtle and nuanced in your anti-semitism.  You code your antipathy for Jews into broadsides about Zionism and other anti-Israeli rhetoric.  But most of us can see that for what it is – code words for “I support the people who would destroy Israel given half a chance.”

            As mighty points out, you label anyone who believes a Jewish state has a right to exist a radical Islamophobe and a Zionist.  But to protect yourself from charges of antisemitism, you engage in the deceptive pretext of agreeing Israel has a right to exist, but then finding that everything they do to ensure that existence is wrong, evil and anti-Islam.

            And that, my dogmatic ideologue friend, is intellectualised, highly rationalised and nuanced antisemitism – to coin one of your stupid “-ophobia” words – let’s call it Judiophobia.

            It comes straight from your proclivity to stereotype and generalise people into neat groups which you can then use to demonise them as individuals.  We hear if from you every day – all conservatives are evil, all Republicans are evil, all Israel supporters are evil, all people who question Al Gore are evil, etc.  A broken freakin’ record of the politics of group and class warfare.  You rarely deal with people as individuals, you treat them as representative of a group in order that that you can apply your hatred of that group to them as an individual.  Reading your mewlings is very much like watching Two Minutes Hate.on the telescreen, if you get the reference.

            Go ahead and proffer up your pro forma denial.  I know I’m expecting it.  But regardless of your denials, your actions tell a much different story.  After commenting here for as long as you have, most everyone has had ample chance to observe your long-standing antipathy toward a free Jewish state in the Middle East.  As you often say, “it’s duly noted”.

          • JoeBritton

            What a rant. You ought to take a look at left wing Jewish American perspectives about Israel and what Israel has been doing to the Palestinians for years, sites like
            Mondoweiss, +972, or Tikun Olam, or perhaps take a trip to Israel and read the left wing over there about the same thing, or just read the damned newspapers.
            Your rant divulges just a lot of ignorance about the conflict.

            But what is perhaps the worst is that you display hackneyed Israeli propaganda, that anyone who criticizes Israel is anti-Semitic. You conflate Israelis and Jews, and then go on with the usual canards about Israel’s existence. That sort of places you in category of the most ignorant. Israel has existed for over 60 years; Palestine does not exist and the right wing Likud government in place has no intention of allowing it to come into existence.

            Do you work for GIYUS by any chance? I have read the same garbage from their kind many times.

          • JoeBritton

            What a rant. You ought to take a look at left wing Jewish American perspectives about Israel and what Israel has been doing to the Palestinians for years, sites like
            Mondoweiss, +972, or Tikun Olam, or perhaps take a trip to Israel and read the left wing over there about the same thing, or just read the damned newspapers.
            Your rant divulges just a lot of ignorance about the conflict.

            But what is perhaps the worst is that you display hackneyed Israeli propaganda, that anyone who criticizes Israel is anti-Semitic. You conflate Israelis and Jews, and then go on with the usual canards about Israel’s existence. That sort of places you in category of the most ignorant. Israel has existed for over 60 years; Palestine does not exist and the right wing Likud government in place has no intention of allowing it to come into existence.

            Do you work for GIYUS by any chance? I have read the same garbage from their kind many times.

          • Anonymous

            “But what is perhaps the worst is that you display hackneyed Israeli propaganda, that anyone who criticizes Israel is anti-Semitic.”

            In the past you have claimed that anyone who criticizes a black person is a racist, anyone who criticizes the “progressive” tax system hates poor people, and anyone who criticizes the palestinians and/or Islam hates muslims.

            We’re just using your own argument against you.

            “Do you work for GIYUS by any chance? I have read the same garbage from their kind many times.”

            Of course. Because anyone who disagrees with you that the Israelis are eeevil must be part of some sinister, shadowy conspiracy organized by a political front group (usually Jewish-run groups, for extra anti-semitic flavor).

            I love how in one paragraph you complain about us promoting “hackneyed propaganda” and then employ it yourself in your next paragraph.

          • Anonymous

            “But what is perhaps the worst is that you display hackneyed Israeli propaganda, that anyone who criticizes Israel is anti-Semitic.”

            In the past you have claimed that anyone who criticizes a black person is a racist, anyone who criticizes the “progressive” tax system hates poor people, and anyone who criticizes the palestinians and/or Islam hates muslims.

            We’re just using your own argument against you.

            “Do you work for GIYUS by any chance? I have read the same garbage from their kind many times.”

            Of course. Because anyone who disagrees with you that the Israelis are eeevil must be part of some sinister, shadowy conspiracy organized by a political front group (usually Jewish-run groups, for extra anti-semitic flavor).

            I love how in one paragraph you complain about us promoting “hackneyed propaganda” and then employ it yourself in your next paragraph.

          • Martin Hale

            Your rant divulges just a lot of ignorance about the conflict.

            And you response demonstrates your inability to extract the meaning out of what you read.

            None, I repeat, none of what I wrote in my “rant” was about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  It was about you, and your antisemitism.

            You come back with some wild-eyed crapola which is either an elaborate self-justification or an attempt to just avoid dealing with what most people see in your behaviour – antisemitism.

          • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

            Liar

    • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

      Well you and Ron Paul see eye to eye on the Joo, clearly.

    • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

      …and that’s one reason Ron Paul will never be President: his disgusting, arrogant, racist, rabid supporters. No way do most Americans want those assholes running the country.

    • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

      …and that’s one reason Ron Paul will never be President: his disgusting, arrogant, racist, rabid supporters. No way do most Americans want those assholes running the country.

  • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

    Well, sure, I’ve been saying for this whole primary season that the candidates need to focus on Obama, not each other.  I’ve been saying that over and over again and finally you guys in the punditry are starting to catch up?  Well its too late now.  The damage is done, and the lust for power these candidates have has greatly damaged the chances of saving this country from 4 more years of an Obama presidency with nothing to  lose.

    • Fail_Baby_Baby

      Someday the Right leaning party can get one of there own past a primary. That is not going to happen this election……..4 more years…. :)

      • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

        I can still see November from here, chump.

      • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

        I can still see November from here, chump.

  • Fail_Baby_Baby

    You are the party of family values. Except when you are not. Newt is a perfect example of that. Now I am still happly unmarried. But I have been to enough weddings. To remember “in sickness and in health, to death do us part.” Well not so much with Newt. Third time is the charm?

    What changed?
    If you dont stand for anything you will fall for everything.

    • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

      Bill Clinton proved no one cares about marital fidelity after being elected twice.  And the Republican Party hasn’t claimed to be the “party of family values” since 1992, so you aren’t keeping up with the times.

      • Fail_Baby_Baby

        Your kidding right? The right wing lost there shit over this. Newt led the way while having some tail on the side. Pretty funny how that worked out.
        The left didnt care that is correct.

        Cav I have to give you some credit that was pretty funny. I have been in a relationship for 7 years. We dont see the need to marry. Over half fail now anyways. We are happy and that what matters. Right?

        • Anonymous

          The right wing lost there shit over this.

          You mean the perjury? Yeah, the right isn’t too fond of Presidents committing felony crimes. I guess we’re just old fashioned that way.

          • Anonymous

            Don’t forget the subornation of perjury and obstruction of justice.

        • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

          Reelection= America just doesn’t care any more about infidelity.

        • Toastrider

          You really should educate yourself more.

          The problem really wasn’t Clinton’s fidelity (or lack of it). Republicans knew he couldn’t keep his dick in his pants even before he was president.

          However, his persistent attempts to hide what was going on were what really caused all the grief. People were wondering what the hell he was covering up so ferociously.

          Might I also add that a president with something to hide is a president who could be leveraged. Think on that.

        • Toastrider

          You really should educate yourself more.

          The problem really wasn’t Clinton’s fidelity (or lack of it). Republicans knew he couldn’t keep his dick in his pants even before he was president.

          However, his persistent attempts to hide what was going on were what really caused all the grief. People were wondering what the hell he was covering up so ferociously.

          Might I also add that a president with something to hide is a president who could be leveraged. Think on that.

    • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

      “Now I am still happly unmarried”

      Somewhere out there is a lucky woman… lucky because she hasn’t met you yet.

    • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

      “Now I am still happly unmarried”

      Somewhere out there is a lucky woman… lucky because she hasn’t met you yet.

      • Toastrider

        What makes you think he likes women?

        Or men, for that matter? 

        I figured he was partial to goats.

        • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

          I had to assume he was considering marrying a woman because, as a Conservative, I can endorse neither gay nor goat marriages!

      • Toastrider

        What makes you think he likes women?

        Or men, for that matter? 

        I figured he was partial to goats.

    • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

      Please show us where the GOP is, or claims to be, the party of family values, Fail troll.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Gingrich: Defeating Obama ‘Most Dangerous President in US History’ a ‘Duty Of National Security’

php developer india
Previous Features
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Advertisement
User Info