Hillary Opposed Iran Sanctions But Now Claims Credit
The former secretary of state has characterized her place in history as akin to a runner in a relay race, taking the baton, running her laps as best she can, and then handing it off to John Kerry, her successor.
But the actual record indicates that, rather than a relay, Hillary Clinton’s role in Iranian sanctions might better by compared to a high hurdles race — with Hillary erecting the hurdles.
In her full-throated defense of her tenure as secretary of state, delivered to the American Jewish Committee last week, Hillary touted her efforts to impose, strengthen and enforce sanctions against Iran in an effort to stop its nuclear weapons program. But the record shows she fought tooth and nail against each new round of sanctions and had her minions in the State Department do all they could to kill them.
In her speech, she said, “We went after Iran’s oil industry, banks, and weapons programs, enlisted insurance firms, shipping lines, energy companies, financial institutions and others to cut Iran off from global commerce.”
Her supposed role in backing sanctions against Iran was the only specific part of her tenure or its legacy that she chose to mention. But the record contradicts even this claim.
Senator Mark Kirk, R-Illinois, who, along with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Menendez, D-New Jersey, led the battle for sanctions, says that Hillary was on the other side.
“Secretary Clinton’s comments are a blatant revision of history,” he told the Daily Beast. “The fact is the Obama administration has opposed sanctions every step of the way as was thoroughly documented at the time.”
The record is clear, documented in the Daily Beast:
–In 2009, the administration opposed the passage of gasoline sanctions against Iran. These were eventually passed unanimously.
–In 2011, Hillary sent her Under Secretary Wendy Sherman to state her “strong opposition” to sanctioning the Central Bank of Iran. Sherman said it would antagonize U.S. allies. She even had her top deputy at the State Department, Bill Burns, meet with top Senators to oppose the amendment. It eventually passed unanimously.
Senator Menendez angrily accused the administration of negotiating in bad faith saying: “At your request, we engaged in an effort to come to a bipartisan agreement … and now you come here and vitiate that agreement.”
–In 2012, Hillary opposed barring Iranian financial institutions from doing business with SWIFT, the global financial clearinghouse. The administration, reportedly, was afraid that “the SWIFT-related sanctions would cause too much disruption to the system.”
–Also in 2012, the administration battled for a six-month delay in additional sanctions. Mark Dubowitz, executive director of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, said that “the decision not to crack down immediately on gold exports, ultimately allowed the Iranians to blow a massive hole in the international financial sanctions.”
Iran was able to sell oil to Turkey in return for gold to shore up its dwindling hard currency reserves.
Hillary’s one apparent contribution to the enforcement of sanctions was her help in lining up votes in the Security Council, but even this claim may backfire. Recent leaks from Edward Snowden indicate that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice requested NSA help in spying on swing votes in the Security Council — Nigeria, Bosnia, Gabon and Uganda. Did Hillary use NSA surveillance to get the votes?
Hillary’s role in NSA surveillance has been largely unexplored. It deserves more scrutiny.
Facebook62.4kTwitter72Email1 Considering how often we see horrific stories of animals being abused and murdered by sadistic monsters, it’s a nice break to see the often unnoticed acts of kindness towards...Read More
FacebookTwitterEmail While President Obama was busy lambasting Big Oil tax breaks on Thursday, yet another one of his environmental welfare
FacebookTwitterEmail The Hillary email scandal changes the calculus surrounding Elizabeth Warren’s consideration of a White House bid. Until now, getting
FacebookTwitterEmail I have long contended that President Obama is in charge on his big-ticket agenda items but disengaged as to