Obama’s Phony Recovery Stats
President Barack Obama, faced with no recovery from the recession as he enters an election year, has come up with a handy political gimmick: Fake the statistics
The economic data which portend recovery are totally and completely inventions of Obama’s political operation. The reality is that no recovery is taking place!
Economist James Fitzgibbon of the Highlander Fund explains how cooked the economic statistics on which the president bases his claims of recovery really are.
Begin with “gains” in the stock market. Fitzgibbons explains that they are no indication of changes in the public mood because the public isn’t doing the investing anymore. He notes that high-frequency trade computers now “account for 80 percent (of the market’s) daily business. No one else is left because they lost their money in 2008, and the public has fled the market … Total NYSE volume is 67 percent lower on average than in 2008. Volume is 29 percent lower this year compared to 2011. The prices (have) no serious meaning.”
Have consumers, as alleged, started borrowing again? Not really. Fitzgibbons explains that “credit use has surged only because the Obama administration changed the student loan program to a direct program, and those loans are now counted as part of this metric. It is not comparable to anything prior to 2011.” And, he adds ominously, “massive credit card use as measured against actual verifiable sales shows the increase is in borrowed funds to pay for food! Not my idea of a healthy sign.”
How about lower unemployment figures? Fitzgibbons calls them a joke. He says that the Bureau of Labor Statistics has “completely changed the … metrics as of January 2012. None of the current percentages are relatable to anything prior to 2012!” He points out that the January unemployment data is heavily adjusted for “seasonal variations.” He notes that “the actual data shows (that the economy) lost 2.7 million jobs in January.” And that’s just the numerator. For the denominator — the number of people in the workforce — the data “also shows about 1.2 million people magically left the workforce.” He says one has to go back to the early 1980s to see labor force participation at the low it is now.
Auto sales? Fitzgibbons says that “auto sales are when the manufacturer dumps cars and trucks on a dealer. Inventory stuffing! It has no relationship to actual sales to a consumer. Thanks to Obama, GM dealers are drowning in product no one wants to buy. It is a meaningless data point. Only dealer-to-consumer data is useful. It is not showing any growth at all.”
Housing? According to Fitzgibbons, positive news in this sector is unreliable. “The raw data we get shows it is worse than last year and in some regions worst ever since the ’60s.”
So it appears that Obama’s reelection strategy hinges on asking people to believe the data he puts before them rather than the evidence before their own eyes. It won’t work.
Any economic recovery is only publicly noticed eight to 12 quarters after it has taken place. Ask Bush 41, who lost the 1992 election despite very positive economic news at the end of his tenure. Or ask Clinton, who lost Congress despite two years of favorable job-creation numbers. It takes a while for the good economic news to sink in. And when there is no good news — only faked government propaganda — it takes even longer to sink in!
People will understand that Obama’s data are a lie. The economy is not some abstract issue. Real people do not depend on changes in the unemployment rate data to gauge their mood. They are more interested in whether they can get a good job themselves. Obama’s attempt to rig the statistics won’t work. Indeed, it is a pathetic attempt.
Even though my father, brother, uncles and grandfather were in the military, I seldom handled guns growing up. That’s because unlike many of the other people in my family, I’ve...Read More
When you were a kid, do you ever remember your mother asking you, “if your friends jumped off a bridge,
Yesterday, I ran across an article in USA Today that should have created a firestorm of controversy. Apparently, Congress has