For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Schools of Education
Written By : Walter Williams

Larry Sand’s article “No Wonder Johnny (Still) Can’t Read” — written for The John William Pope Center for Higher Education Policy, based in Raleigh, N.C. — blames schools of education for the decline in America’s education. Education professors drum into students that they should not “drill and kill” or be the “sage on the stage” but instead be the “guide on the side” who “facilitates student discovery.” This kind of harebrained thinking, coupled with multicultural nonsense, explains today’s education. During his teacher education, Sand says, “teachers-to-be were forced to learn about this ethnic group, that impoverished group, this sexually anomalous group, that under-represented group, etc. — all under the rubric of ‘Culturally Responsive Education.’”

Education majors are woefully lacking in academic skills. Here are some sample test questions for you to answer. Question 1: Which of the following is equal to a quarter-million? a) 40,000, b) 250,000, c) 2,500,000, d) 1/4,000,000 or e) 4/1,000,000. Question 2: Martin Luther King Jr. (insert the correct choice) for the poor of all races. a) spoke out passionately, b) spoke out passionate, c) did spoke out passionately, d) has spoke out passionately or e) had spoken out passionate. Question 3: What would you do if your student sprained an ankle? a) Put a Band-Aid on it, b) Ice it or c) Rinse it with water.

Guess whether these questions were on a sixth-grade, ninth-grade or 12th-grade test. I bet the average reader would guess that it’s a sixth-grade test. Wrong. How about ninth-grade? Wrong again. You say, “OK, Williams, so they’re 12th-grade test questions!” Still wrong. According to a Heartland Institute-published School Reform News (September 2001) article titled “Who Tells Teachers They Can Teach?”, those test questions came from prospective teacher tests. The first two questions are samples from the Praxis I test for teachers, and the third is from the 1999 teacher certification test in Illinois. According to the Chicago Sun-Times (9/6/01), 5,243 Illinois teachers failed their teacher certification tests. The Chicago Sun-Times also reported, “One teacher failed 24 of 25 teacher tests — including 11 of 12 Basic Skills tests and all 12 tests on teaching learning-disabled children.” Yet that teacher was assigned to teach learning-disabled children in Chicago. Departments of education have solved the problem of teacher test failure. According to a New York Post story (11/14/11) titled “City teacher tests turn into E-ZPass,” more than 99 percent of teachers pass.

Textbooks used in schools of education advocate sheer nonsense. A passage in Enid Lee et al.’s “Beyond Heroes and Holidays” reads: “We cannot afford to become so bogged down in grammar and spelling that we forget the whole story. … The onslaught of antihuman practices that this nation and other nations are facing today: racism, and sexism, and the greed for money and human labor that disguises itself as ‘globalization.’” Marilyn Burns’ text “About Teaching Mathematics” reads, “There is no place for requiring students to practice tedious calculations that are more efficiently and accurately done by using calculators.” “New Designs for Teaching and Learning,” by Dennis Adams and Mary Hamm, says: “Content knowledge is not seen to be as important as possessing teaching skills and knowledge about the students being taught. … Successful teachers understand the outside context of community, personal abilities, and feelings, while they establish an inside context or environment conducive to learning.” That means it’s no problem if a teacher can’t figure out that a quarter-million is the same as 250,000. Harvey Daniels and Marilyn Bizar’s text “Methods that Matter” reads, “Students can no longer be viewed as cognitive living rooms into which the furniture of knowledge is moved in and arranged by teachers, and teachers cannot invariably act as subject-matter experts.” The authors add, “The main use of standardized tests in America is to justify the distribution of certain goodies to certain people.”

Schools of education represent the academic slums of most any college. American education can benefit from slum removal.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University.

2
  • kuldeep kalonia

    Thanks your site is very informative for us.

    graphic design institute

  • http://aconservativeteacher.blogspot.com aconservativeteacher

    Great post! I’m going to link to it over at my blog, where I also discuss and write about how liberal and progressive views are destroying education and teaching.
    aconservativeteacher.blogspot.com

  • Martin Hale

    “The Chicago Sun-Times also reported, “One teacher failed 24 of 25 teacher tests — including 11 of 12 Basic Skills tests and all 12 tests on teaching learning-disabled children.” Yet that teacher was assigned to teach learning-disabled children in Chicago.”

    Well, it’s not as though those learning-disabled kids would know the difference, eh?  I mean, why waste a ‘good’ teacher on the bottom of the academic barrel? 

    /Sarc

    • Anonymous

      Good thing the unions are there to protect hard working decent teachers from being unfairly treated by the state.  

      • NotJoeBrit

        I hope that was a sarcastic comment. I love how unions claim to be “for the children” yet, at the end of the day they really only protect bad teachers.

        • Anonymous

          Very much sarcastic.

          Unions in this case seem to protect the most incompetent while oddly enough preventing the more competent from advancing due to seniority rules.

          I can understand being concerned about being fired every few years whenever there is a new election.  However we’ve gone way to far in the other direction and now keep employed people who are not only sub-par but seem to be severely harming the opportunities for thousands of kids.  

          But public education isn’t about education, it’s about those sweet sweet union kickbacks.  

  • http://phaedoscorner.blogspot.com Wynne1

    John Dewey, steeped in the Marxist faith, moved education away from the “drudgery” of memorization.  He correctly noted that memory, itself, was not enough — that it had to be built upon.  But any teacher worth his salt already understood that.  Trouble is Progressive Education came to emphasize ‘enhancements’ at the cost of the requirement to master fact.  Student-centered teaching regarded students as a victim class, in general, but especially when they were required to remember stuff.  Still in fashion, and why “rote-learning” is now used pejoratively. 
    Memorization is foundational to learning.  Where does one end up if memorization is absent?  Say not knowing multiplication tables, declensions and conjugations, theorems and axioms — the list is hard to exhaust.  Reminds me of a builder short-cutting his foundation in favor of painting or interior decorating.  What Marxists don’t understand (useful idiots among them, not cynical elites) is that being nice to people — more often than not — is not being nice to people.  Being nice, though, is now the chief criterion for teachers. 

    • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

      That is exactly right, Dewey and similar thinkers are the architects of the horrible education system we have right now.  And it was part of the “long march through the system” by socialists to fundamentally remake everything.  Their efforts have been abysmal failures, but they’ll never go back, ever.  Progressives are about progress, change even if its totally unnecessary or destructive and never ever going back even if its far better.

    • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

      That is exactly right, Dewey and similar thinkers are the architects of the horrible education system we have right now.  And it was part of the “long march through the system” by socialists to fundamentally remake everything.  Their efforts have been abysmal failures, but they’ll never go back, ever.  Progressives are about progress, change even if its totally unnecessary or destructive and never ever going back even if its far better.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info