For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
David Frum Lost His Gig With AEI: Boo-Hoo
Written By : John Hawkins

There was a time when I respected David Frum. He was an ex-Bush speechwriter, he had a gig at National Review, and I was impressed enough with his views on the foreign policy front to interview him.

However, Frum apparently got tired of being a small fish in a big pond over at NR and decided to create his own website. Originally it was called “New Majority” and it has morphed into Frum Forum.

Despite the fact that Frum has at least some name recognition on the national political scene, influential friends over at National Review who are still talking him up, and has received tongue bathings galore from the MSM for attacking conservatives, his website has never taken off.

In the kingdom of conservatism, I’m a mud splattered peon, and even I have not one, but two websites (Right Wing News & Linkiest) that are bigger than his according to Alexa.

Moreover, Frum tries to portray himself as  a  conservative free-thinker, a Republican idea man, a rightie who thinks outside of the box, yada, yada, yada. I disagree because I think Frum is something else entirely: a sell-out who thinks he can help his career by bashing people who are popular with conservatives.

You see, there’s a group of people out there who make a living portraying themselves as “Republicans who don’t like other Republicans.” The mainstream media loves people like that because it allows them to claim to be balanced, even though they’re merely promoting the views of yet another person who agrees with the liberal line. As far as I can  tell, that’s EXACTLY the niche David Frum is trying to fit into. So, why in the world should any conservative support someone like that?

In any case, David Frum once again gave the liberal media exactly what they wanted to hear after the health care reform bill passed and his association with American Enterprise Institute ended shortly thereafter:

David Frum told us last night that he believes his axing from his $100,000-a-year “resident scholar” gig at the conservative American Enterprise Institute was related to DONOR PRESSURE following his viral blog post arguing Republicans had suffered a devastating, generational “Waterloo” in their loss to President Obama on health reform. “There’s a lot about the story I don’t really understand,” Frum said from his iPhone. “But the core of the story is the kind of economic pressure that intellectual conservatives are under. AEI represents the best of the conservative world. [AEI President] Arthur Brooks is a brilliant man, and his books are fantastic. But the elite isn’t leading anymore. It’s trapped. Partly because of the desperate economic situation in the country, what were once the leading institutions of conservatism are constrained. I think Arthur took no pleasure in this. I think he was embarrassed. I think he would have avoided it if he possibly could, but he couldn’t.”

We talked at length afterward with an AEI official in an effort to get a specific response to Frum’s charge. …Frum, who will be 50 in June, had been on the payroll since leaving the Bush White House in 2003. He acknowledges he was very seldom at the office. But he maintains he developed and spread conservative ideas — AEI’s stated goal — with the 300,000 words a year that he writes for his blog, FrumForum.com; his weekly columns for CNN.com, The Week, and the National Post of Canada; his biweekly offerings for TIME and American Public Media’s “Marketplace”; and his three TV and three radio appearances in a typical week. He also landed Canadian Finance Minister James Flaherty for an AEI retreat last month that included donors. Frum tells us that regardless of his dismay with the party, he’ll stay registered GOP.

Let’s be honest: there are probably a hundred people just as qualified as Frum for that cushy gig at AEI and with the rest of them, you’re not going to have to wonder if they’ll “stay registered GOP.”

Furthermore, the whole idea that conservatives aren’t supposed to get down on people like Frum, Meghan McCain, Kathleen Parker, David Brooks, etc., etc., is insulting. At least liberals have the chops to let everyone know that they despise conservatives. These people pretend to be on our side, undercut us at every opportunity because they think it’s good for their career, and then whine if they get any blowback for it. If these people want to make a career out of cutting off conservatives at the knees for the amusement of the  Left, I don’t see any reason why conservatives should go along with it or worse yet, hand them cherry $100,000 jobs on a silver platter for the privilege of being insulted.

0
  • Jack Schite

    So you and our party ARE completely incapable of introspection!

    It was hard to imagine a more honest critique but your fragile little republicon ego says “boo hoo stop you big bully.”

    A party in decline indeed.

  • baoxian

    I think more people ought to be fired if that place was cutting Frum a $100,000 paycheck.

    His site is hillarious though. This guy’s ego is spectacular. I don’t think I’ve ever seen more self-referential links and pictures on a blog before. You don’t even have to scroll down to see three pictures of Frum. He’s such a self-important elitist that one of his lead items is a post about how all the stupid redneck hicks are wrong about Beltway elitism…and then goes on to “set the record straight” as if the entire DC social scene revolves around him. What a joke.

  • D-Vega

    And the Big Tent gets smaller and smaller.

  • Realpolitik

    Poor Frum, wrong for so long, has now become a Cassandra.

  • StanInFtWorth

    And the Big Tent gets smaller and smaller.
    Posted by D-Vega 2010-03-26 13:41:37

    Did you hear that from Joe Lieberman, Vega?

  • D-Vega

    Nah, Stan. I heard it from Arlen Spector, Lincoln Chafee, John McCain, Rudolph Giuliani, Lyndsay Graham, and Olympia Snowe.

  • julesi

    Frum is still part of the Big Tent. We just don’t want him to think he speaks for the rest of us.

    Kind of like how the Liberals really don’t want the Blue Dogs speaking for the Dems any more.

    BTW wasn’t Obama supposed to be the Great Uniter?

  • baoxian

    “And the Big Tent gets smaller and smaller.”

    I guess you missed the part about him remaining a Republican. The story is about him losing his vastly overpaid job. But why would we expect you to understand? You cheer for Obama as he racks up trillions in debt and hires anybody with a pulse for a $75,000 government desk job. It’s all other people’s money right? you liberals sure as hell didn’t earn it.

  • D-Vega

    BTW wasn’t Obama supposed to be the Great Uniter?

    No, that was Bush.

    The only uniting he did was unite conservatives and liberals AGAINST HIM.

  • Bill_Dalasio

    And the Big Tent gets smaller and smaller.

    Fair enough. And in that spirit, Vega, I’ll announce that I’m a liberal Democrat. It’s just that the rest of my fellow liberal Democrats are complete idiots, buffoons, douches, and frauds for not favoring across-the-board tax cuts, 2nd Ammendment rights, a return to deregulation, a states-rights favorable position on social issues, massive cuts in government spending, and an immediate repeal of Obamacare.

    Now, can I get my $100,000 check from George Soros?

    If not, it’s just because the rest of you don’t believe in a big tent.

  • Thomcat

    Bill – guess you’re going for three election losses in a row.

  • RWNReader2

    I think more people ought to be fired if that place was cutting Frum a $100,000 paycheck.I wonder how much they’re paying Andrew Sullivan.

  • D-Vega

    Wait, George Soros is handing out $100K checks just to argue political pts on cable news shows?

    Shit, I’ve been giving you guys all my gold stuff for free.

  • Bill_Dalasio

    Posted by D-Vega
    2010-03-27 01:14:32

    Well, clearly someone in the liberal Democratic camp ought to be giving me money to give them this brilliant insight.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    I’ve never understood why on earth anyone would think that when a group has a specific outlook and viewpoint they should embrace and keep people who disagree vehemently with that viewpoint. If you have an organization based on the love of baseball and one of your members writes constantly about how baseball sucks and should be abandoned, is it so odd or unreasonable to ask them to leave?

    The left is simply idiotic about this. The American Enterprise Institute is a specific organization with a specific set of goals and ideas. If you don’t agree with those you shouldn’t be a member. That’s so obvious it must be that the left posting here has to just be acting childish when they post mocking it.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

    Vega fails to mention the throwing of Joe Lieberman under the bus by the left, for the crime of doing what is right for the country.

    Go against the party doctrine and you get tossed.

Advertisement
Featured Video

If I Was Your President (Boyfriend Spoof)

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info