For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Is Rush Right?
Written By : Kathleen McKinley

* I want to give a big ole southern shout out to Rush Limbaugh listeners!!!! Thanks for dropping by! Read me here, and be sure and visit my own site http://kathleenmckinley.com/  Thanks to Rush for reading this on air!!!!!!

I’ve listened to Rush Limbaugh off and on for 20 years now. I agree with him on most things. I wish his personal life wasn’t so dramatic and unfortunate, but no one can argue the fact that he is the best broadcaster out there, bar none.

Through the years I’ve always been amazed how right he was, and I’m not talking about issues or personal beliefs. I’m talking about predictions and the reasons behind political decisions. He warned us during the primaries that nominating anyone but a true conservative would be the wrong candidate. I didn’t believe him. Like a lot of Republicans, I thought we needed a more moderate Republican. One who had compromised with the other side. One that would bring us the independents and moderate Democrats. I thought McCain fit that to a tee. And he did. But I was wrong, and Rush was right. When we stick to our ideals and principles, we win.

But for the last year Rush has been saying something about the Obama administration that I can’t wrap my mind around. I just can’t believe it could possibly be true. What is it? Well, if you have been listening to Rush you know.

He believes that the Obama administration is destroying the economy on purpose. On purpose. He says that the more people depend on the government, the more control the government has over the people and it’s institutions. He says this plan is a way for Democrats to stay in power…..always. If the majority of people depend on the government for their security and livelihood, and the Democrats are the ones promising more goodies from the government (not to mention ACORN type voter registration including illegal aliens voting), then the people will keep voting them in. It isn’t Democracy and liberty, but in the end it’s all about power.

I just could never buy that. It’s too far out. Too conspiratorial. I’ve always believed that the road to hell is paved with Democrat’s good intentions. I believed that programs like welfare and food stamps was a compassionate idea gone bad. I thought that the Democrats really did just want to help the poor, and had no idea that it would cause generational poverty that takes away the dignity of the person.

The problem with that is that it’s been clear for years that it did cause generational poverty. It’s clear that these programs, full of fraud and waste, have had disastrous effects. In the black community it has caused 70-80% of black children born into unwed homes, children raised without fathers, increase in crime and incarceration, despair, and drug addiction. When it comes to welfare in the white and hispanic community the statistics aren’t much better.

Yet, with all the evidence around us, the Democrat still insist on more and more dependency on the government. They still push for more programs, more money for these programs, and more big government.

Why?

Could Rush be right again? Could it possibly be true that all this is on purpose?? Could it be possible that this is all about power? That the bigger dream is that those like Obama, who see themselves so much smarter than the rest of us, who know better than even our founding fathers, who see themselves as our parents who need to guide us and show us how to live, actually sees a economic morass as a perfect opportunity to take more and more control so they can implement their version of their liberal Utopia?

It boggles my mind. I can’t accept that.

But then, I was wrong about McCain too.

0
  • vote24

    Well if Rush is wrong, please give me any logical explanation for their actions. Not their words, but Democrat’s actions. The only answers are 1) pure stupidity and misunderstanding of how the world works in a state of reality, or 2) nefarious BS traitorous &*$%#$%^&

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    Rush is not the only one who has been making these predictions.

    The reason why Limbaugh is correct is because Obama is a hardcore leftist. Leftists have always hated the U.S. for its success and are doing everything they can to destroy the country from within.

    Take the stimulus, for example. There is no possible way that any one (or any country) can spend its way into prosperity. You can invest money but there is a big difference between investing and spending.

    Leftists believe that the entire planet should be equal in every way. They refuse to believe the obvious facts: that capitalism yields more individual prosperity than socialism or communism. They’re too obsessed over the “equality” issue that they refuse to look at the truth.

    Health care is another example. At first, leftists whine about the uninsured but every argument eventually turns to ‘excessive profits.’ In this example, leftists really don’t want to help the poor they only want to destroy the successful. Any troll who posts on this thread will eventually confirm what I’m stating.

    Limbaugh is only looking at evidence. He doesn’t have a crystal ball.

  • William Teach

    I’ve heard Rush say the same thing, and I have always been a bit skeptical of it. I don’t think Obama is intentionally destroying the economy as Rush says, but, he is destroying it because of sheer incompetence and wishful leftist thinking.

  • canddmf

    Any rational observer would have to conclude that on average, Rush must be right.

    Surely, there must be some individual liberal legislators that actually still DO THINK such policies create good by creating a safety net that is easy to get into and is sufficient for their life’s needs.

    However, anybody that actually studies the outcomes sees what you noted in the original post. Those that actually study it AND understand the outcomes (as described) must have other motives at heart.

    The only other motive that makes sense is personal gain on their own behalf. It seems quite clear, based on my discussions with many of my children’s school teachers in CA that the majority of them lean Democrat and Liberal. Given that they are unionized and government employees, their job security increases whenever the government is more firm and unaccountable for results.

    Not all must feel this way, but I would estimate that a majority do feel that way, just out of their own self-perceived self-interest.

  • Mike_M

    Well we know for a fact that Obama has been schooled by and associated with Cloward-Piven socialists, apologists for American power, environmentalists dedicated to reducing the population and economic activity, and card-carrying communists that believe in punishing the rich in order to redistribute their wealth to the poor.

    The question shouldn’t be: “do we believe Obama is intentionally destryoing the economy”, but “why have we been so reluctant to take these people at their word”?

    The facts are plain. The words and actions of Obama and his associates. Basic economic principles. The cannibalistic death-spiral of socialism that has been predicted by Rand, Orwell, and others, and played out many times throughout history.

    The road we’re on is as obvious as the eventual outcome. The time for polite debate and the illusion of a healthy status quo is long since past. Either we stop the liberal agenda or this country is looking at a permanently crippled economy and cession of superpower status. History only gives nations one shot at hegemonic power. We blow it and we can enjoy the next 500 years as today’s Spain or France or Turkey and talk about the good old days when we had wealth and freedom and power.

  • sluggo

    They don’t view it as destorying the country. They are “changing” it for the better…..

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    I don’t think Obama is intentionally destroying the economy as Rush says, but, he is destroying it because of sheer incompetence and wishful leftist thinking.
    Posted by William Teach
    2010-01-08 16:06:37

    If Obama is destroying the country out of ignorance then even our advanced educational system is worse than initially thought.

    That’s like saying if I lose my job, the best way to help myself is to spend like there’s no tomorrow. Even an individual without a college degree knows that one must spend less if they’ve lost their job.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    Don’t forget that high-ranking political officials love oppressive regimes, providing that they’re the ones running the show.

  • President_Friedman

    Posted by Mike_M
    2010-01-08 16:19:48

    The thing I always thought Rand pegged so adroitly about socialists is that they are almost always in denial about what they’re doing and what they ultimately want, especially the ones on the political end of things (how many times did the moochers in Atlas Shrugged earnestly shout, “But that’s not what I meant!”). I don’t think Obama is intentionally destroying the economy, but that’s what his ideology will do so I’m not sure why his intentions matter.

  • StanInTexas

    I don’t think Obama is intentionally destroying the economy as Rush says, but, he is destroying it because of sheer incompetence and wishful leftist thinking.
    Posted by William Teach 2010-01-08 16:06:37

    If Obama is doing what he is doing out of sheer incompetence, then the law of averages says he would have done something by now that BENEFITED America.

    Can anyone tell me what that thing would be?

  • Mike_M

    Posted by President_Friedman
    2010-01-08 16:28:05

    What I found much more chilling was her ability to nail the liberal progression from good intentions to compulsion in carrying out their policies.

    Look at health care. They started with raising taxes for Medicare and Medicaid. Now they’re requiring coverage they approve of with fines or jail as the alternative, and forcing providers and insurance companies to play by their rules. Can there be any outcome other than the next step being a Directive 10-289 for doctors as they start to opt out of seeing Medicare patients and leaving their practices?

  • President_Friedman

    Posted by Mike_M
    2010-01-08 16:45:57

    Oh, I’m not denying those things are a highly probably end-result of these policies (policies Obama campaigned on and won with). I just think Obama really and truly expects that costs will go down as a result of everybody having to buy insurance, and that he believes, as liberals are prone to, that when you have a bad situation where people are hurting, you must do SOMETHING, ANYTHING to try and change it, and those intentions are earnestly used to justify short-sighted, poor decisions.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

    but, he is destroying it because of sheer incompetence and wishful leftist thinking.
    Posted by William Teach
    2010-01-08 16:06:37

    Winner winner chicken dinner

  • SkydiverRick

    Democrats believe that ” at least I tried” is an acceptable outcome. They don’t care if a program works, they just like that warm and fuzzy feeling that they get from pretending to care.

  • Safari_Man

    My sense is that Obama feels this country is “owned by white people” and that he is trying to bring whitey down as a form of payback. All the dims feel this way — not just the blacks. Of course, blacks feel it more intensely (but Michelle isn’t as good at hiding her disdain).

    The best way to bring whitey down is to mess up whitey’s possessions, ie the economy and culture that “belongs to whitey.” You see this sort of thing in all sorts of dysfunctional relationships — the boyfriend who slashes his beautiful girlfriend’s face when she jilts him, the wife who spends all her husbands money when she finds out he cheated on her. The rioters who burn down their own neighborhoods which are all owned and operated by the white man and Korean immigrants.

    Yes, Rush is right about this. The dims are trying to damage the country because they are convinced they are disenfranchised and are not really part of what this country is about. They aren’t really thinking much about how it will look/work once the goose that lays the golden eggs has been kicked in the reproductive organs so hard it can’t lay eggs any more. But it sure felt good getting that kick in, huh?

  • Pingback: Is Rush Right About Obama? | NewsReal Blog

  • FranklinR

    Mike M,

    “I’m not sure why his intentions matter”

    Don’t we all want to believe the best of people? That’s why people are seeking an answer to his motives,

    1) is he stupid
    2) is he a puppet
    3) is he evil
    4) whatever

    That will only satisfy our curiosity. It won’t change anything. Finally,the only thing that matters is that he’s doing it.

    And we have to stop him.

    NOW.

    Not in November … NOW.

    Start with your state’s primary!

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    Rush is right. So is Glenn Beck. They’re both saying essentially the same thing: the Obama administration is deliberately collapsing the American economy to give the Federal government massive power and control over everything. Everything.

  • tylertooo

    I am just hoping that people wake up before it is too late. Obama has done nothing but try to destroy America since day one. I have been convinced of this for some time, otherwise nothing that Obama does makes any sense at all. Rush, and Glenn Beck are both stating Obama’s mission to destroy. The craziest part is that everyone is not standing up to say no. I just can’t understand how anyone would want the government control that I feel the progressives want over us. Will we not stand up for FREEDOM?

  • bolivar

    Did anybody see Glenn Beck where Clintoon was having a gab fest and Cloward and Piven were right behind him?? Of course they are trying to collapse the economy but, the right is too dumbfounded to believe it. I get so pissed that Beck and Rush are vilified and laughed at and the lefty communists poo poo this and are believed.

    We are in deep kimchee if this health bill is finally passed. The only way I can see it not is if (and when) Scott Brown wins in Mass. and gets seated in time. They will try to delay it but, I think that would be way too obvious now don’t you????

  • michaelalan

    Where are the trolls and why haven’t they thrown their talking point-two cents in?

  • Caroline

    i’m interested in other aspects of this story…the backhanded compliment to Rush…’his personal life is dramatic and unfortunate’?? We should ALL be so unfortunate. She doesn’t give him credit for his analysis of the situation. What can you expect from a democrat turned alleged republican (RINO). Is this gal a republican like spector was a republican or some other allegedly newly awakened dems turned rep journalist? what a wishy washy article.

  • Safari_Man


    Where are the trolls and why haven’t they thrown their talking point-two cents in?
    Posted by michaelalan

    I’m thinking Soros is late with his payments.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Lets put it this way: I don’t think President Obama would be unhappy if the Cloward-Piven scheme came about and worked, but I do not believe he’s actively working toward it.

    I think he’s such a totally academic pointy headed leftist twit he believes his schemes are the right idea, the kind of “we’ve figured out how to fix the world” stupidity college kids come up with then usually grow out of – unless they become professors and are isolated from the real world around them by various layers of yes-men and like-thinking zealots.

    And Caroline: having drug problems, a failed marriage, and other personal issues is dramatic and unfortunate. There’s nothing RINO about Sparkle.

  • Caroline

    There’s nothing conservative about her either.

  • RWNReader2

    Obama did not promise to “tweak” immigration, he did not pledge to “improve” health care, he did not say the economy would “change for the better.” No, Obama promised “FUNDAMENTAL change” for the country. What part of “FUNDAMENTAL change” are you having trouble with?

  • tazzmax

    I don’t know about you all, but I am convinced that Beck and Rush are right about “MaoBami”,….he is following the “Cloward/Piven” strategy.

    He wants to completely collapse our economic system and replace it with complete govt control,….and the scumbag progressive commies in congress are helping him reach his goal.

    He knows what he’s doing all right, and he’s an evil SOB, IMO!

  • Safari_Man

    Rush is discussing this article right now on the air.

  • RWNReader2

    Congrats Kathleen.

  • Pingback: Is Rush Right? « TeeJaw Blog

  • Pingback: The Power of Philosophy — The New Clarion

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info