British Report: Not Letting Sex Criminals Adopt Children Is Discriminatory
Britain provides yet another example of why the last people you would want advising lawmakers are pointy-headed liberal establishment “experts”:
The government could face legal action if it continues to ban sex offenders from working with children, according to research published today.
A report by a family law expert argues that some sex offenders should be allowed to adopt or foster children, and claims that the current blanket ban is discriminatory.
“Sex offenders shouldn’t all be tarred with the same brush,” said Helen Reece at the London School of Economics, who wrote the report.
If we can have Muslims on the Homeland Security Advisory Council, why can’t the British have sex criminals working with and adopting children? The important thing is not to tar all fiends with the same brush.
Sex offenders have been prohibited from working with, and adopting, children since 2006, when measures were put in place to prevent a recurrence of the murder of schoolgirls Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells by school caretaker Ian Huntley in Soham.
But raped and murdered children are a small price to pay for advancing the cause of political correctness.
On tips from Auntie Sam and Mats. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.
Making a man believe that his child doesn’t exist for decades is an unusually cruel thing to do. But for Tony Trapani, a secret letter he found after his wife...Read More
It’s a little sickening how men are usually convicted so harshly after killing their children, but if a mother does
News has emerged today of an investigation by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) that has discovered hundreds of federal workers
Abdullah Faaruuq, a Muslim “spiritual advisor” and chaplain from Boston-based Northeastern University, was a key speaker at a fundraiser for