More Leftist Hate: Misogynist Edition

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com

Premium Left blogad

Left Blog Ad

Permalinks

More Leftist Hate: Misogynist Edition

Written By : Melissa Clouthier

Yawn. Liberal men hate women. Yawn again. One thing I realized early on in this business is that the supposed haters were not the conservative, white, middle-aged males. Those were my readers. Nope. The haters were hipster leftist men, and more shockingly, women, who had unresolved issues with their mommies.

Whatever, they do not like women and they don’t mind falling for stereotypically anti-feminist language to do it. Oh, the irony. These same people will turn right around and say they’re “pro-women” as long as she’s the right kind of woman–you know, the one who will let you have sex, not use condoms and dispose of any unwanted side-effects. Anyway, example number 2,679 of leftist hate, misogyny edition. From Mediaite:

Lance Baxter, the voice actor who was fired by Geico for a nasty voicemail he left in Freedomworks’ inbox, is following up his “Teabagger Boogie” with a new ad that takes aim at the Tea Party group’s president, Matt Kibbe. He starts out by scoring a few amusing, if simplistic, points on the Tea Party, but it soon becomes clear this is an exercise in personal score-settling when his Kibbe character says he thinks his subtle, side-burn-fueled attempt to get laid “is working on Tabitha.”

Who is Tabitha, and why is Lance Baxter flashing her picture as Matt Kibbe’s object of lust?

Meh. Just another disgruntled leftist caught in his own net of hate. There are so many of them these days. Difficult to keep track of them.

-1

President Friedman

I agree that there are a lot of leftist mysoginists out there. But I've also been kind of alarmed over the last year or two at the number of conservative identifying men I know who are lining up w/ the Men's Rights Movement. I don't find anything inherently wrong w/ the issues Men's Rights Movement is involved in, but you can't go to any website where these issues are discussed without being comletely mortified by the attitude of the posters there (especially in the comments sections) about women, and specifically American women. And these sites almost always end up being tangetially linked to “game” sites where the tone is even worse than the MRM posts.

It's a real issue that manhood has a tough time finding a workable role in modern society, even moreso in metropolitan areas, but the solution is NOT for men to act like a) whiny little girls or b) the absolute lowest common demonator of the worst stereotypes about men. We need to do better, regardless of our political ideologies.

Christopher Taylor has some great and insightful posts about masculinity and the modern male over at his site, Word Around The Net.

Also, one of my favorite guy sites addresses these issues fairly often: http://www.artofmanliness.com.

whats_up

Pres,

At least you can admit that there are Conservative men out there that are hating on women. Unlike Melissa who cant convince herself that Conservative men can do no wrong. It is troubling no matter what your beliefs. Women deserve respect for being human beings.

StanW

Melissa never said Conservative men can do no wrong, crthns. The voices in your head are lying to you again.

Did your prescription run out again?

Martha

Learn to R E A D!!

“One thing I realized early on in this business is that the supposed haters were not the conservative, white, middle-aged males. Those were my readers.”

StanW

Piss off, Martha!
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Does Melissa talk about ALL conservative males, retard, or just her readers in that statement, I see simple logic is way over your head again!! It's logical that since she didn't include ALL then she was talking only about the ones who were readers, and therefor that subset was NOT misogynist. EPIC FAIL!

You need to learn to read for comprehension!!!!
UFKA_Smithwick

That doesn't state anything about all conservatives.

For it to do so it would have to be stated that every single conservative read her blog. I do not think that is the case.
Hotspur1

Learn to ARGUE!!!

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

And where do you get that idea, it's not like she even mentions conservative men, one way or the other? Or do you ASSUME that becuase she doesn't scour the internet for conservative male misogyny, that she wouldn't condemn it?

Martha

Learn to R E A D!!

“One thing I realized early on in this business is that the supposed haters were not the conservative, white, middle-aged males. Those were my readers.”

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Does Melissa talk about ALL conservative males, retard, or just her readers in that statement, I see simple logic is way over your head again!! It's logical that since she didn't include ALL then she was talking only about the ones who were readers, and therefor that subset was NOT misogynist. EPIC FAIL!

You need to learn to read for comprehension!!!!
Martha

Dear Lord, it is painful that you are so ignorant, and amusing that you are so proud of it. Your concept of logic is so limited as to be meaningless. Much as are you.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Pot meet kettle.

Please show us all your brilliance, marthtwat, show us how Melissa says ALL consevative males are free missogynism.
Martha

“free missogynism. ” lol
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Ooooh I had a typo, how will I ever get over this blow to my self esteem?

So I see you couldn't actually counter the facts.
Martha

Two typos, dummkopf.

The “fact” (if you knew how to read) is the statement “One thing I realized early on in this business is that the supposed haters were not the conservative, white, middle-aged males.”

You know – she is even using English.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

“One thing I realized early on in this business is that the supposed haters were not the conservative, white, middle-aged males. Those were my readers.“

You conveniently left our this little part of her commentary, where she is talking ONLY about her readers, and since not every conservative male reads her blog, she is not in fact including them all.

So again YOU are taking one sentence, out of context, to support your lies. Next you'll try to tell us the sun rises in the west!
Martha

No, it is you who takes an independent sentence out of context and extrapolates its meaning.

So much for your “logic”.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Oh look martha the emotional liberal, schooling me on 'logic'. More epic fail, by the original queen of EPIC FAIL.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

It would be good if you could admit that many on the left are very hateful toward women if they happen to stray from the leftist plantation.

Good, but highly unlikely.
Hotspur1

And I'd like for you to admit that there was (and is) disgusting misogyny and vile slander on your side against Palin. Admit it.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Yeah, there's nothing conservative about hating women, but there are a lot of men out there who really bash women. Don't get me wrong, there are a lot of problems with American women because of our culture and the almost total loss of the concept of what femininity and womanhood really means, but that doesn't excuse some of the really angry rhetoric out there.

Martha

The concept of what femininity and womanhood are depends upon the individual woman. That's one of the points about women being subjugated.

mightysamurai

The concept of what femininity and womanhood are depends upon the individual woman.

Right. That must be why feminists talk down to and insult women who choose to be stay-at-home mothers or who just disagree with feminism in general.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Why, yes, to one woman feminine might mean being a tree, and to another it might mean being a rainbow of silver mist from Venus!

Relativist idiot.

mightysamurai

I agree that there are a lot of leftist mysoginists out there. But I've also been kind of alarmed over the last year or two at the number of conservative identifying men I know who are lining up w/ the Men's Rights Movement. I don't find anything inherently wrong w/ the issues Men's Rights Movement is involved in, but you can't go to any website where these issues are discussed without being comletely mortified by the attitude of the posters there (especially in the comments sections) about women, and specifically American women.

I've never heard of this “Men's Rights Movement” myself, but whatever.

First of all, I question whether the supposed anti-woman attitude of these “Men's Rights” websites is any worse than the anti-male attitude of any given feminist website.

Second, is there any reason to believe that this alleged anti-woman attitude is anything but a reaction to the anti-male attitude of mainstream feminists? What I mean is, is there any evidence that these men actually believe the things you claim you've heard them say about woman?

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Or is it backlash against the feminizing of men and the metrosexualization movement. A move back towards strong masculinity that of course goes about two steps too far into macho asshole, instead of just strong and competitve male.

http://www.conservativesense.com Conservative Sense

All special interest liberal groups are like that. Black conservatives are simply whitey's pawns if you ask the NAACP. Most of these groups operate under the guise of special interest groups, when in reality they are just fronts to help them spread their liberal agendas.
UFKA_Smithwick

It's not that they hate women necessarily. They just don't tend to think of them as human. Women are tools that are useful at times to implement their policies.

But what do you do with a tool that doesn't do it's job? You scream at it, throw it away and storm off (if you're a liberal at least).

That's all it is. Women who don't perform as expected are essentially defective tools to them. To be blamed for their failures, cursed out, and replaced.
Martha

U R reading and weeping, R U stan?
Huron Voyager

By definition, a liberal can not be a misogynist.

StanW

By Definition? Are you serious?

Huron Voyager

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Liberal

A liberal is not and can not be a misogynist, by definition. Facts of life.

StanW

And name for me ONE Democrat that is currently a by-definition Liberal, Huron.

Yeah, that's what I thought!

Huron Voyager

Well, they are the Democratic Party. Not the Liberal Party.
StanW

So you can''t name even one by-definition Liberal.

Thanks, huron, you and your moronic definition are dismissed!

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

It depend on which specific set of liberal's you are talking about DUMBASS, since they are all seperate definitions. One can be POLITICALLY liberal, and still be a misogynist, because the two not necessarily overlap. Thanks for proving yet again, you failed Basic English.
mightysamurai

Okay, let's say we believe you.

According to the definition that you just cited, by definition a liberal ALSO cannot favor gun control, welfare, clean air regulations, zoning laws, Affirmative Action, or single-payer healthcare.

All of those things constrain individual freedom, and a liberal, by the definition you cite, is someone who is “favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, esp. as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.”
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Sadly, many on the left are, which sort of makes your attempt to make the dictionary definition into reality even more pathetic.
Georgiana

Which is why “liberals” should be called “statists,” as Mark Levin calls them.
Hotspur1

Wow. Pwned in a couple of posts.
Kefkajr007

But that would mean that the people who call themselves “liberal” today have anything at all in common with those who coined the term, and we all know that certainly isn't true.

Trench_Raider

Just like “by definition” a black person cannot be racist, right?
Please…
Sarah Palin and Michele Malkin would like to have a word with you about that comment.

TR
Martha

While Conservatives (and this – sadly – includes Conservative women) enjoy keeping “the little woman” in “her place”. And that place is subservience.

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Proof please, other than the voices in your head.

UFKA_Smithwick

I think she must not have been paying attention during the 2008 election.

The sexism directed at Palin by Obama supporters was quite intense.

StanW

No even to consider the sexism directed at Hillary as well. Obama did not care who he crushed in order to win.

mightysamurai

Kinda like the liberals who said Sarah Palin should've resigned from the campaign so she could go home and concentrate on her children?
Hotspur1

Which is why Sarah Plain is in front and center. Oh, wait…

UFKA_Smithwick

True, by definition a liberal is not a bigot.

However that's the traditional definition of liberal which has nothing to do with what modern people identify as liberal.

Modern liberals tend to be quite bigoted, hiding it only when necessary to achieve some particular end.
Hotspur1

Flagged for moving the goalposts. You know fully well the modern vs. classical definition of liberal.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Just ask an aborted baby girl what the left thinks of women. Oh wait you can't, because she's dead.

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

Premium Right Ads

Blogads Right

Previous Features

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”

Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth

Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers

The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation

The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans

Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders

User Info

Features

Archives Best of RWN Humor John Hawkins Interviews Quotes Special to RWN