For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Nobody Has A “Right” To Charity
Written By : John Hawkins

Over at the Huffington Post, Kerry Kennedy and Monika Kalra Varma are making a rather bizarre argument about Haiti,

The international community too often regards procurement and distribution of basic supplies as charity, but it is wrong. Access to food, water, shelter, education and healthcare are basic human rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. For too long, the international community has also failed to involve local communities in the planning process or open their books so local stakeholders could see what was to be spent on which projects.

Like many liberal “ideas,” this sounds nice, but it’s almost unspeakably stupid and ill-thought out.

Providing people with “food, water, shelter, education and healthcare” costs money. So, it may sound nice to say that those things are “rights,” not charity, but what it actually means is that you believe someone else should be deprived, by force if necessary, of his property so it can be given to someone else.

Furthermore, there’s not even a need for the people receiving the “food, water, shelter, education and healthcare” to be grateful or even to work to provide those things for themselves. After all, they’re not receiving “charity,” it’s their “right” to receive those things.

Moreover, it’s true that conservatives tend to be a little quick to play the Commie card. But, when you start declaring that one person has a “right” to things that another person worked for and earned, you’re stepping up to that line. In fact, when you get right down to it, what Kennedy and Varma said there is little different from Marx’s famous quotation, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”

If Kennedy & Varma want to argue that more should be done for Haiti or that nations that pledged aid should live up to their pledges, that’s fine, but when you start claiming that we have a responsibility to pay for “food, water, shelter, education and healthcare” for everybody in the world because it’s their “right,” then you’re veering into dangerous territory.

0
  • Christopher_Taylor

    Giving people food shelter and water is charity. Blocking them off from or preventing them access to these things is a human rights violation. The problem with these leftists is that they think human rights = must be provided at the expense of others, and that's simply not how it works. Nobody has to give you a house even though you have the right to property. You have to earn it, the only time that right is being violated is if someone prevents you from having free access to and opportunity to gain the item or good in question.

  • Lee

    No one has a “right” to the earnings of another. That's the same as saying one person has the “right” to the labors of another (where earnings come from). The word for that is slavery. Kennedy and Varma are saying they support slavery.

  • UFKA_Smithwick

    Tell ya what: it can be enshrined as right with the caveat that anyone who sincerely agrees that it is a right is on the hook for paying all the costs necessary to ensure everyone “gets whats theirs”.

    Everyone who does not believe it is a right will not be under any financial obligation to do so.

    Oh and you have to sign up for one side or the other before we figure out the costs and divvy them up fairly (or we can do it progressively, I don't really care).

    Deal?

  • Dmpav

    I will not have any government co-opt my Christian duty and privilege to freely help people in need.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com Martin Hale

    Resources taken from people under threat of punishment, however veiled, and distributed to others in the name of charity isn't even close to the spirit of being charitable. It's coercion, plain and simple. A good example of such heavy-handed “charity” can be found in the practice of tithing during the Middle Ages. Be charitable, or else.

  • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

    Charity: freely giving your own time and/or money to help those you believe need it.
    Slavery: being forced to give your own time and/or money to help those who the government decides needs it.
    Any questions?

  • Oldlefty

    When the British National Health Service was struggling through Parliament in 1948, many people were saying they disagreed with the idea. “Why should I pay for some lazy b****rds health bills” was a common view expressed even by the slightly more well off.
    The greed and 'me first' social Darwinism, blessed by Milton Friedman, Reagan and Thatcher must have opposing forces which are democratically accepted. The alternative is anarchy and history repeating itself.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Ed Klein on ‘The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House’

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info