For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Secondhand Smoke Hysteria Crosses Into Psychosis
Written By : Dave Blount

The moonbat campaign against cigarettes has reached levels of hysteria not seen since the Salem witch trials. In Dallas, Chris Daniel is suing for six figures because her former neighbor smoked.

According to Daniel, cigarette smoke somehow managed to seep through the “solid, two-hour fire wall from the foundation to the roof” that separates homes in her townhouse development, causing her to suffer the torments of the damned. Nonetheless,

the Daniels renewed their lease at Estancia — where smoking is permitted — six months after they say the problem began.

Management bent over backwards trying to pacify the petty tyrant.

Managers replaced air filters repeatedly, installed sealant-type electrical plates and — at the Daniels’ request — used an industrial-grade roofing sealant to caulk pipes under their kitchen cabinet.

However, greedy moonbat bullies are not so easy to appease.

The neighbor moved after a judge forbade her from smoking in her own home. This still wasn’t enough. Only large amounts of other people’s money can satisfy a moonbat. The Daniels have moved too:

Last week, movers wearing surgical masks loaded trucks with their belongings.

The Daniels said furniture will need to be reupholstered, artwork restored and closets full of clothing dry cleaned. The bills are still piling up.

The point of this theatrical farce: an avaricious lawsuit.

But wait, there’s more moonbattery:

Chris Daniel also filed a complaint under the Texas Fair Housing Act, alleging that her sensitivity to cigarette smoke qualifies her for protection set aside for people with disabilities. …

Dr. Barbara Stark Baxter, a clinical associate professor at UT Southwestern Medical Center, wrote that Daniels “qualifies as disabled under the Texas Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act.”

If bureauweenies reward Daniel with coveted victim status for claiming she could smell a cigarette through a firewall, she will officially become a higher being, whose whims are law to the rest of us.

Until recently, cigarettes were a normal part of life. What aspects of daily living that we take for granted now will generate this kind of uproar in the near future, as liberal authoritarianism draws ever tighter around us like a python constricting its prey?

cary-chris-daniel.jpg
Cary and Chris Daniel, equipped to retrieve their belongings from the tainted townhouse.

On a tip from nancz. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

0
  • aharris

    This reminds me of a college roommate who decided that my aquarium was causing her allergies. She told me to remove it, and I told her to give me a week to try to make arrangements for it to go elsewhere. When the week was up, I had made arrangements both for it to go to someone else's place for a few months and for people to help me move it. When I got there, she'd already had our neighbors carry it outside.

    Yeah, this reminds me exactly of that. I'll bet she'd convince herself that the neighbors' cigarette smoke was causing her allergies.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    I'm mildly allergic to cigarette smoke. Depite that, I used to wear a button that said "Go ahead and smoke — I hate fascism worse than tobacco."

  • Realpolitik

    "Go ahead and smoke — I hate fascism worse than tobacco."

    Posted by CavalierX

    However, since the one has nothing to do with the other, what's the point?

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Posted by Realpolitik

    2009-10-01 13:50:03

    Shush, child. Adults are talking.

  • Realpolitik

    Adults are talking.

    Posted by mightysamurai

    Oh – WOW! The wit. The intelligence. The originality. No – wait – it's all smoke and mirrors.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    what's the point?

    Wit and humor are entirely wasted on Liberals.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    Nixon sees everyone favorite Gay Aryan Warrior Realpolitik is here, back from playing dress up with his Nazi friends. Now don't talk to it folks, it may rub off on you.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    Out in the land of fruit and nuts, the Golden State, I witnessed people crossing the street to harass a smoker; I witnessed people being harassed for smoking in their cars; I witnessed people standing the prescribed distance from the door of their office building being verbally assaulted for smoking. Judging by these experiences, I suspect that the rest of the nation has more to learn about virulent smoking Nazi's can be in day-t0-day interactions.

    I'm not a smoker and I don't see any redeeming value in smoking, but I'm certainly not going to harass someone for smoking in their home, their car or on the street. That's just wrong.

    Here's a little thought experiment for you all. If second-hand smoke is such a danger that the presence of it can be used to justify heavy-handed interventions as noted in the story above, then is it inconceivable that someone, somewhere will file a lawsuit against someone for breathing exhaled CO2 onto them? After all, the EPA has designated CO2 as a toxic gas and that seems like all the justification some of these clowns need to charge after someone else full-force.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Posted by Realpolitik

    2009-10-01 13:50:03

    Posted by Realpolitik

    2009-10-01 14:47:48

    How droll, another fart in the wind that is the hollow left, and it's brainless, thoughtless, emotion laden drones. Providing no facts, false allegations, and/or flat out lies, to make it's banal point.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    is it inconceivable that someone, somewhere will file a lawsuit against someone for breathing exhaled CO2 onto them?

    You realise that sooner or later the State will "have to" regulate all activities that result in rapid breathing, including sports and sex, right?

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    My point exactly, Cav. Let the lunacy begin continue!

  • aharris

    If the state doesn't regulate our evil sin of breathing satifactorily, I wonder how long it will be before terrorists from ELF or some serial killer begin knocking people off for being "unregulated" polluters.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    sooner or later the State will "have to" regulate all activities that result in rapid breathing, including sports and sex, right?

    Posted by CavalierX

    2009-10-01 15:58:26

    Does that mean that my old high school "Federal Bikini Inspector (FBI) card might come in handy? Great! ;-)

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    Does that mean that my old high school "Federal Bikini Inspector (FBI) card might come in handy? Great! ;-)

    Maybe Obama will make you the Swimwear Czar.

  • Bill_Dalasio

    Now don't talk to it folks, it may rub off on you.

    Mr. Nixon,

    Using "rub" in any reference to fwankie/m@@tha/Realpolitik is just excessive. Now if you'll excuse me, I think I need some mental floss.

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info