For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
The Devil’s In The Debt Ceiling Details
Written By : John Hawkins

Since Cut, Cap, & Balance can’t move through the Senate, we’ve been having a big fight to decide which plan that won’t fix our problems is going to become law. Here’s the compromise that has supposedly been decided upon,

A White House official cautioned that no deal had been reached and that details floating out there were “inaccurate”.

* $2.8 trillion deal. It would raise the debt ceiling by that amount through 2012 and make equal spending cuts.

* $1 trillion in cuts would be agreed now.

* Special committee appointed by Congress would recommend a second installment of savings of about $1.8 trillion. Congressional leaders have been aiming for finishing that work by the end of this year.

* If Congress cannot agree on how to implement the cuts recommended by the committee, automatic cuts would be triggered, including reductions in military spending and cost savings to the Medicare healthcare program for the elderly. Benefit cuts would not be triggered though.

* No cuts in Social Security.

* It was unclear whether tax increases could contribute to the additional budget savings under the trigger.

2.8 trillion dollars wouldn’t alter our financial trajectory over the long haul, but given that the Democratic Party’s starting position was zero, it still COULD be called a small victory for the GOP and a step in the right direction. I say “could be” because there are a lot of unknown details.

For example, other versions of the plan floating around say that tax increases can be part of the special committee’s recommendations, which would mean the GOP would be put in a no win situation where it either had to break its pledge not to raise taxes or vote for Medicare and Defense cuts. Republicans would be foolish to sign onto a deal like that. Furthermore, who’s going to be on this “special committee?” Can it recommend tax increases? Will there be a way to weasel out of the “automatic cuts?” How big would the defense cuts be? What kind of defense cuts would they be?

Moreover, are we going to be passing another important piece of legislation that isn’t being read by the people voting on it? We better not be. Obama, whose grand contribution to this whole process has been to get in the way, has reversed himself yet again and now is saying he’s willing to sign a short term debt ceiling increase to move the deadline out a week or two. Republicans should take him up on it. They also shouldn’t sign onto a deal that let’s Democrats weasel out of that 1.8 trillion in later cuts or that puts them in a position where the Democrats will be able to accuse them of choosing to cut Medicare and money for the troops rather than raise taxes on the wealthy. Republicans have pledged not to raise taxes and they should not agree to any deal that puts tax increases on the table. They gave their word to voters and they should keep it.

As to whether they should vote for this bill or not, the devil’s in the debt ceiling details. Until we know what those details are, there’s no way to say.

1
  • Anonymous

    agreed Hawkins. This bill still lacks any meaningful entitlement spending reform, doesn’t repeal Obamacare, and reduces the size of government by any amount.

    Time to go primary some RINO’s and put Tea Party candidates up in the open and Democratic incumbent races.

    • JoeBritton

      You can begin the process of reducing the deficit, Dick, by sending back your social security and medicare benefits.

      After this debacle, the Tea Party is dead. So I suggest that more Tea Party candidates run, and that they give us a Bachman-Palin ticket in 2012.

      • Daytrip

        Yeah! There is nothing dangerous about not being able to meet your immediate day to day finacial obligations without going further and further into debt…. Stupid Tea Party, why don’t you just relax and get while the getting is good? Your children are good for it.

      • Anonymous

        still hating on women Joe? Just admit you are a homosexual and spare us your vaginaphobia.

        Why would Nixon send back benefits he doesn’t receive? Flagged for lying.

        • Anonymous

          You’ll have to forgive janzillysweetgaldbritton. He’s to stupid to make it without nanny goverment to do everything for him. He assumes everyone else is too.

      • Toastrider

        Here’s an interesting point: a lot of us would opt out of collecting these benefits if we could opt out of not paying for them. You know, as in eliminating those taxes from our paycheck.

        But there’s kind of a problem with that… namely that if we did try to opt out, we would be thrown in prison.

        • gfchicago

          Too bad we weren’t given the option that Galveston TX has.  That town/county opted out of SSI and people pay into their own retirement plans that gives them interest on their savings, and it’s their money and they can leave it to whom they choose when they die.

          http://tinyurl.com/pm8yez

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info