A Proposal on Personhood
Yesterday a measure failed in the Mississippi elections. The measure would have declared that life begins at conception and therefore what liberals like to call an “unviable tissue mass” deserves to have the rights of a human being.
I agree to a small degree that if the measure would have passed that a whole lot of maybe unintended consequences would have emerged. But that is, I feel, a discussion worth having. Why shouldn’t we argue from the position that human life is precious?
But many leftists said it is “madness” to say that life begins at conception because it would impinge on liberal’s love affair with infanticide. Certainly, some might say “the madness” is all the babies getting killed that liberals conveniently don’t accept as “human,” but, well, you know.
So, what is a human, anyway?
Essentially left-wingers have no logical argument about what is and isn’t a “person.” They argue to kill babies merely out of convenience. They just don’t want the bother of having a baby. About time they admitted it.
Fact: Those “unviable cells” liberals keep yammering about can ONLY become a human being if left to grow. They can’t accidentally grow into a dog, or a house fly. Ergo they ARE a human.
But, I’d like to postulate a level of agreement with liberals. Let’s agree that we can “decide” out of our own rear ends when human cells “become” human and then attain personhood. This is an entirely arbitrary point in time, mind you, but so what, we don’t expect leftists to have logic on their side, do we? I mean, having the luxury of making this arbitrary decision would be very convenient in many ways.
So, since we can just “decide” when a human is “really” a human, I say no one that has the unfortunate mental defect of being a left-winger is human. See, now we can abort them all we want.
Or how about we decide that no one with any other mental or physical defect is “really” fully human? What if we have a baby that is two years old? They can’t act autonomously, right? What if we don’t want them any more? Wait, how about if some stinking old person becomes non compos mentis? They could all be considered “unviable,” can’t they?
Let’s just eliminate all these dang “unviable” things? (In fact, these poor folks HAVE all been considered ripe for elimination by liberals in certain Universities — look up Pete singer–… oh, and those nice Nazi folks from WWII, also. They were big fans of such eugenics.)
Gosh. The convenience is awfully liberating, isn’t it?
Oh, but now all those caring leftists are going to get all huffy that I am advocating to kill liberals. Well, so what? What logical reason do they have to say my arbitrary decision on what is a “real” human is any better than theirs?
Is it that liberals don’t want to be aborted? Well, gosh, they should feel lucky that we can ask them the question. Sadly, the babies left-wingers want aborted don’t have that luxury.
Of course I am being absurd to illustrate the absurdity and arbitrariness of their stance on when a person mysteriously becomes a person. They have no logical underpinning to say that we can’t “abort” liberals, or old people, or the physically disabled.
On the other hand, those that argue for the sanctity of life and argue that serious discussion should accompany the ending of that life before such a decision is made have nothing but the most logical, most bedrock principles upon which they approach the issue.
Making a man believe that his child doesn’t exist for decades is an unusually cruel thing to do. But for Tony Trapani, a secret letter he found after his wife...Read More
Warner Todd Huston
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago-based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com, BigJournalsim.com and all Breitbart News' other sites, RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, and many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs across the country to discuss his opinion editorials and current events as well as appearing on TV networks such as CNN, Fox News, Fox Business Network, and various Chicago-based news programs. He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions : EMAIL Warner Todd Huston and follow him on Twitter, on Google Plus , and Facebook.
Yes, I do realize that “feminist lunacy” is sort of redundant. As for the ad itself, you might want to
Progressives don’t just want to change our civilization; they want to obliterate it. Thus the opposition to securing borders against
A Minnesota TV news story perpetrated a perfect example of one-sided “news” coverage especially where it concerns the politically correct