For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
AGW Bill On Life Support In Senate, Puppies May Die
Written By : William Teach

I think we can firmly place this in the category of “good news for a Monday”

The climate-change bill that has been moving slowly through the Senate will face a stark political reality when it emerges for committee debate on Tuesday: With Democrats deeply divided on the issue, unless some Republican lawmakers risk the backlash for signing on to the legislation, there is almost no hope for passage.

Most Republicans will vote no, if they know what is good for their political careers, much less their constituents. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) could face some very stiff competition come 2014 for his support of this craptacular legislation for this fake issue.

So Democratic leaders, with the support of the Obama administration, are trying to sway at least half a dozen Republicans by offering amendments to speed along their top priority: building nuclear power plants.

In other words, bribes that are things we should be doing already. Bribes that will be forgotten by Democrats minutes after the passage of a cap and tax bill. Bribes that could actually be over-written with legislation after cap and tax is passed.

“There is nowhere near 60 votes for a nuclear power bill on its own. There’s not 60 votes for a cap-and-trade bill as it’s currently constructed,” Graham said in an interview. He said combining the two measures is “the only way you’ll get to 60 votes.”

Democrats have been whining about “clean energy” for years. France uses a majority of nuclear energy. Why can’t we? Nuclear energy would seem a slam dunk. But, this whole charade is not about “going green,” but about control of countries, economies, and private citizens. Because the science is not “settled.” If anything, more and more information comes out as scientists feel emboldened to actually going against the Approved Doctrine. Two researchers at MIT have cast doubts on the UN IPCC climate modeling. A team of scientists have sent a letter saying that consensus is fake.

But, just remember: if we don’t “do something,” puppies will drown and bunnies will die. And all you skeptics are child murderers. Which is why governments, such as the Australian one, try to gag publications. It’s for your own good, especially when they lie about the overall costs. And if you are a big climate polluter, you should be treated like a murderer.

0
  • BIG

    AGW Bill On Life Support In Senate

    Maybe if we try mouth-to-mouth recessitation, it will survive? On second thought, I am sure that mouth-to-mouth will be outlawed in the legislation because if produces CO2. Nevermind.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    The thing is that even if the Congress fails to pass legislation, and even if the IPCC fails to lead Copenhagen to a resolution, we can't just relax and say we've won. Failure on these items will cost these alarmists billions, if not trillions, and I don't think they're going to take it lying down. I think they're going to heap the pressure on advertisers, and content producers in Hollywood and beyond to ramp up the AGW lunacy in their ads, books, movies, and TV shows. AlGore has made over $100MM on glowball wormin, you can't honestly think he'll stop just on one or two defeats. No on your life. He wants to be the next George Soros and just like Georgie, I have the distinct impression that he'll say or do anything to keep the gravy train rolling. Why just last week, he told a crowd that seas would rise 220 feet by 2050 if we didn't give in to him. 220 feet. Now that's a man-sized lie, if I ever saw one.

  • rmiller

    Failure on these items will cost these alarmists billions, if not trillions, and I don't think they're going to take it lying down.

    Posted by martinhale

    2009-11-02 14:19:52

    Despite your mentioning of Al Gore….the alarmists you are talking about are corporations. That's why you are claiming billions, if not trillions.

    The corporations won't take it lying down…other than Al Gore, care to name the alarmists?

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    Actually the majority of the alarmists can be found in three specific places:

    1. Academia

    2. The press

    3. Government

    Sure, if we're stupid enough to pass whatever evil is contained in Waxman-Markey or Boxer-Kerry, there will be some economic winners, but not all of them are alarmists now are they? Many of them are just businesspeople who see an opportunity and they'll take advantage of it if they can. I think they call people like that opportunists, don't they?

    But please, I invite you to do some of your own legwork and learn about the rude fates of those in academia who've failed to tow the climate alarmist party line. Oops! No more funding; no more classes to teach; if you were in line for tenure, you're not any more. Careers have been destroyed for simply not towing the party line. I myself got a very cold shoulder at a department of a major university that had hired me for a compensation project. My sin? I declined the offer of free tickets to go to AlGore's upcoming lecture on campus. No editorial comment was made, just a little white lie that I was busy that night. For that I was called flat-earther by half-a-dozen professors. And we never, ever discussed their or my views about climate change at all.

    And those who're in a position to distribute funding for research have clearly enriched those who've kissed the ring of AlGore. That goes for academia and government.

    Now, here's a very partial list of known alarmists, most of whom have or stand to personally profit from their alarmism through books, lectures, or other deals.

    James Hansen

    George Monbiot

    Joe Romm

    Mark Serreze

    Rep Markey

    Rep Waxman

    Sen Boxer

    Sen Kerry

    Michael Mann

    Ross Gelbspan

    Andrew Revkin

    Sir John Houghton

    Stephen Schneider

    Shaye Wolf

    Lee Kump

    Heidi Cullen

    Richard Littlemore

    Chip Knappenberger

    Gavin Schmidt

    Tim Barnett

    Richard Somerville

    Dave Hampton

    Ban Ki Moon

    Kevin Rudd

    Sir Nicholas Stern

    Bert Bolin

    Your liberal sensibilities (I know folks, big oxymoron there) may not like it, but there really is a war of money going on over climate – those who want everyday citizens to contribute more money through taxes, fees, fines and other mechanisms to fund another layer of government, this one world-wide. If it all goes through, billions of dollars a year will disappear down the rabbit hole of the UN alone, and even their own IPCC scientists are saying that CO2 control won't solve the problem. But it's going to cost you me and everyone else dearly to pay for the alarmists power and control fantasy. And then there are the national level schemes which will cost even more.

    And in the end, nature is still going to be nature, and climate is going to continue doing exactly what it's been doing for 4.6 billion years – change in ways we can't explain, nor control.

  • Pingback: And Rightly So… » Blog Archive » Monday Evening Links

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info