For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Child Molesting Teacher Can’t Be Fired Thanks to Union
Written By : Warner Todd Huston

In 1997 a Brooklyn teacher was accused of attempting to molest a sixth-grade girl at PS 138. As it happened, he admitted the behavior, but no criminal charges were filed when all was said and done. Still one would think the fact that he inappropriately fondled a teen should be enough to get him fired from his teaching position. But then again, in New York you can’t even fire a child molester if he happens to be a teachers union member.

Thanks to the fact that it is nearly impossible to fire a teacher, this lowlife has been drawing his almost $100,000-a-year salary to do nothing. You heard that right, to do nothing.

You see, even as the union agrees that this pedophile isn’t fit for a classroom, the union still won’t agree to his being fired. So, teacher Roland Pierre sits in a “rubber room” five days a week and does nothing and he’s paid $97,101yearly to do so. And that doesn’t include benefits.

For particulars on the accusations and how the case came out, see the New York Post piece written by Susan Edelman. Suffice to say that it’s the taxpayers getting taken to the cleaners.

Edelman also casually notes that the school system has five other such teachers that have been on the clock but doing nothing for years and at full salary.

For those unaware of what a “rubber room” is, it is an office to which union members report when they are on suspension and/or are under investigation for misconduct. They go to these offices and read newspapers or magazines and sit around drinking coffee and watching TV. They do this while their cases are winding their way through the system before a determination can be made if they are to be fired or returned to the job.

Rubber rooms are not just seen in the New York school system but in many school systems across the country (usually in the larger cities) as well as other union infested industries like the auto industry under the heavy hand of the United Auto Workers (UAW).

The problem with these rubber room policies is that teachers are being paid sometimes for months and other times for years — as in the case of Mr. Pierre – while their cases snail through the system of constant claims, counter claims and arbitration forced on school systems by unions. Sadly, taxpayers across the country are footing the bill for thousands of these union members to sit around in a relaxing climate without having to work day in and day out.

Often it is so hard to fire these people that some of the most outrageous cases of misconduct never sees justice done and teachers fired. Another New York teacher, for instance, actually impregnated a 16-year-old student and a few years later molested two 12-year-olds yet the state still found it impossible to fire him.

Stories just like these in New York also happen in Los Angeles and many other cities.

Sadly, even when it comes to protecting child molesters, our teachers unions only care about the dues money they can pry out of our taxes and making sure that no union member is ever held to account for their behavior.

0
  • Anonymous

    Gotta love unions. Protecting the little guy from the abuses of management.

  • http://www.angry.net/blog2 Angry Webmaster

    My answer is simple. Charge the union heads with aiding and abetting child abuse. :)

    • Anonymous

      I’d give all the union heads the choice of either firing the guy or putting their kids in his class.

      See if their attitude changes.

  • glynn

    The charges were dropped and he can return to the classroom, the district has chosen not to return him….. Why do you hate facts?

    • Don_cos

      He admitted to it! Why do you hate children and love child molesters?

      • glynn

        Ya….. things were dropped……

        Pierre wrote he then left his seat and “we hugged each other and I gave her three kisses.”
        Pierre “denied arousal on his part,” and insisted the girl did not “protest.” He claimed she even invited him to a party planned for teachers that week.
        Stancik recommended Pierre’s termination.
        Officials would not explain what happened since, but sources said the criminal charges were apparently dismissed, and a DOE disciplinary case was “dropped on a technicality.”

        Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/rubber_room_dirty_old_man_t4OA6Bw25idPYynCnVJHyO#ixzz19QpSCSRJ

        • Anonymous

          “Dropped on a technicality” is NOT the same as “Cleared of all Charges”. Maybe the prosecuting attorney missed a filing date. Maybe the police lost some evidence. Maybe a couple I’s weren’t dotted and some T’s weren’t crossed and the judge was in a bad mood.

          Whatever happened this teacher engaged in inappropriate behavior with a young girl. The school district decided he is unfit to work in the classroom, therefore he should NOT be “working” as a teacher any-longer.

          • Mediumheadboy

            “Dropped on a technicality” is NOT the same as “Cleared of all Charges”.

            Troll’s probably a member of NAMBLA anyway.

          • Anonymous

            Yeah it was abuse, but it wasn’t ‘abuse-abuse’.

            You would think molesting students would be the one thing a teacher can always be fired for.

        • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

          Kissing a student three times isn’t any particular cause of alarm for you? Excuse me??

  • Anonymous

    “Another New York teacher, for instance, actually impregnated a 16-year-old student and a few years later molested two 12-year-olds yet the state still found it impossible to fire him.”

    Fire him??? That SOB should be shot!

    For that matter, in the example cases, there would be no problem if the school system had done the right thing and had the scum CHARGED CRIMINALLY. I’m betting they never even CALLED the police in these cases. This is a prime example of the unintended consequences that result from liberal policies intended to make life more “fair”. It is an example of the moral decay and rot that has been eating away at our Civilization and destroying the American way of life.

    The union can still defend these scum because they are NOT convicted criminals. Their defense is that they are only “suspected” of crimes.

    The parents sending their kids to these schools should be storming the prosecuting attorneys offices and DEMANDING a full investigation into this travesty. And ANY official that failed to report should be charged with failure to report a felony and failure to report child abuse.

    Let me say this again. IF you are a school administrator and you have a teacher that has committed child abuse, and STATUTORY RAPE you CALL THE COPS. You do NOT go to the union and allow them to stand in the way. If ANYBODY knowingly attempts to stop you, you REPORT THEM for Misprision of a Felony! And if the Union Rep comes blustering into your office attempting to throw his weight around in defense of such scum you RIP THEIR F*#$!%G HEAD OFF.

    • glynn

      did you read the article????

  • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

    The number of instances of kids abused by teachers in schools is many, many times the number of kids abused by priests, yet we hear virtually nothing about the former and tons about the latter. Both are wrong and a betrayal of their roles. Both were handled poorly and usually covered up. And both, apparently, result in their management shuffling people around instead of letting them go.

    • Don_cos

      Maybe the Catholic Church should unionize.

      • marcellucci

        Maybe unions should look into being more Christian.
        I’m reminded of the scene from Raiders of the lost Ark when the guy’s head melts……

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YWXM6Q6QGELGTT334IQMWB774Q David

      The MSM and the progressives had it in for the Catholic Church and were eager to expose any wrongdoing. They are on the side of the public schools and the unions so they hush it all up.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com Martin Hale

    My cynical side suspects that the union has required the BoE to make sure that the “rubber rooms” have Wi-Fi coverage so the poor dears can surf the net while marking time. I wonder how many surf porn sites while they wait for their cases to be adjudicated.

    A lot of folks are going off on the union, but you have to keep in mind that the BoE/school administration agreed to the contractual terms which now tie their hands, and in that regard they are complicit in causing the problem we’re reading about.

    Someone, probably a long time ago, blinked during collective bargaining and this is the result. Yes, teacher’s unions are some of the more scurrilous labour types in the US these days, and yes, I agree with Mr. Huston that teachers, being largely public employees should have very limited rights to representation. But we’ve also got to hold the bureaucrats accountable for the mistakes they’ve made in collective bargaining over the years. Taxpayers need to demand of the school administration types that they demand at least finite time limits on resolution of unadjudicated cases.

    It’s the taxpayer who’s taking it in the shorts here, and as nearly as I can tell, they’re getting it from both the union and the BoE, neither of which seems to particularly care about the fiscal impact of their actions on the suckers who’re paying the bills.

  • Waterwillows

    As far as I know, unions are not immune from civil lawsuits. That’s the direction I would be looking to if my child were affected or even attending the school. I could not in good decency send any child into harm’s way.

  • Jim

    Lazy and incompetent management types love to blame the ‘Union” when they foul up a firing case taken before an arbitratorr which would seem to be a slam dunk for management. Its like people who blame the attorney for the defendent who gets a “not guilty” verdict for his client because of an incompetent proscecutor who blew the case even though most rational on lookers not bound by the rules of evidence would conclude that the defendent was guilty.

    • marcellucci

      Actually, it’s like when your child is molested by a union teacher who’s protected by the union because they want their union fees.
      Or more acurately, its like having your nards in a vise, knowing that there’s nothing you can do to protect your children from pedophiles.
      But I guess you have no kids….of your own…no fair counting your students…..

  • marcellucci

    Stop. Teachers. Unions. NOW!!!!
    Conflict of interest.
    If you love your job, you don’t need representation.
    Your actions will propel you to higher staus with your company or another’s.
    If you hate your job…..don’t teach…..anyone….
    Get another occupation…..

  • Jim

    Sounds like a case in which both an incompetent prosecutor and an incompetent school manager could not make a charge stick against a person who was represented by a competent crimminal defense attorney and a competent union business agent.

  • Revshawn

    Good grief. Grow a pair and fire this guy anyway. Duh. I mean imagine the public backlash when society finds out the Teachers Union is going on strike to protect a pedophile.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info

Users Online