For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
DeMint Decries Union Obstruction in TSA
Written By : Warner Todd Huston

The Democrats are trying to paint the GOP as “obstructionists” for blocking the appointment of Obama’s choice of Erroll Southers to head up the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Democrats are claiming that by blocking the closure of debate on Southers the GOP is trying to obstruct “tighter security at airports.”

But there is an ulterior motive in play for the Democrats, naturally. And, again naturally, it is an effort by Democrats to hand a victory to unions. One of the things that Senator Jim DeMint (R, SC) is trying to stave off is the unionization of our airport security personnel as the Democrats are trying to slide this by the American people in the guise of “security.”

DeMint brought this up in an appearance on CNN on Dec. 29. When asked why he is putting up a protest about Souther DeMint noted that Obama waited 8 months to appoint someone to fill this spot then wanted the appointment to sail through with no debate.

But DeMint also warned about the stealth unionization that Obama is trying to slide past the American people.

Transcript of the relevant section:

CNN: Is there anything that you are going to do to counter this motion he’s going to file to cut off debate?

Jim DeMint: I think that the American people should be aware that the priority of the Administration is to submit our airport security to collective bargaining even though that’s been prohibited since the agency was formed. The reason it’s prohibited is the same reason for the CIA, the Secret Service, the FBI, the Coast Guard… is there’s a constant need to adjust and to be flexible to sue imagination to change things. We cannot ask a third party union boss whether or not we can move a screener from one station to another. That’s what collective bargaining does.

DeMint is arguing that unionism would hamper the ability of the federal government to quickly and efficiently react to the forever changing landscape of airport security. DeMint is 100% right. If the government has to go through layer after layer of union rules, find itself encountering union obstruction, and the threat of union actions against it every time it finds it necessary to deal with the changing security situation in order to stop terrorism, we will all find ourselves with an even more dangerous travel situation than we now have. As DeMint notes, that is why collective bargaining has been prohibited in the first place.

But, in keeping with Obama’s desire to give freebies to unions and his disinterest in our national security, he’s trying to push the TSA to be opened up for unionization. Once again with this Administration the needs of unions takes precedence over the safety and success of the American people.

(Cross posted at TheUnionLabelBlog.com)

0
  • Robert_Ingersoll

    The threat of a union is of more concern to Sen. DeMint than a terrorist.

  • TheBaud

    The threat of a union is of more concern to Sen. DeMint than a terrorist.
    Posted by Robert_Ingersoll 2009-12-30 13:32:54

    You must enjoy being a dumbass, Robert_Ingersoll.

    It is the Democrats that are so beholden to the unions that they are placing our national security BEHIND the union demands. Sen DeMint is simply pointing out their treasonous behaviour.

    Not that you care in the least for the safety of America or Americans. ASSHOLE!

  • tblrk2006

    The threat of a union is of more concern to Sen. DeMint than a terrorist.
    Posted by Robert_Ingersoll
    2009-12-30 13:32:54

    What you meant to say was that to democrats the prospect of unions are more important than the threat of terroism.

    Please, if you can, name an industry that functions better with unions than without right now. There isnt one. Now apply that to an industry as important as the TSA and the jobs they are tasked to do.

  • Rickvid_in_Seattle

    You could take it to the bank that the entire TSA collective agreement would end in early- mid-November. That way, they could pressure the government to give them anything they want in order to not totally foul up the Thanksgiving/Christmas/New Year travel season.

    Just imagine a TSA strike called for November 20th some year! And for good measure, the union bosses, while collecting full pay and the strikers collecting strike pay (peanuts) would just not feeeel like coming to the bargaining table for a while. Maybe until mid-December when the pressure would be huge.

    But if we can get a real leader into the WH, can anyone say PATCO?

  • http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2009/12/unionize-the-tsa-no/ The Patriot's Flag » Unionize the TSA? – NO!

    [...] RightWingNews: But there is an ulterior motive in play for the Democrats, naturally. And, again naturally, it is an effort by Democrats to hand a victory to unions. One of the things that Senator Jim DeMint (R, SC) is trying to stave off is the unionization of our airport security personnel as the Democrats are trying to slide this by the American people in the guise of “security.” [...]

  • http://vodtou.blogspot.com/ צפייה ישירה

    i am very enjoy to read your post i gald to return to your site in the futer

Advertisement
Featured Video

Debbie Spend-it-now is selling America’s future to the Chinese

php developer india
Previous Features

Ads

Five Ways Conservatives Will Have to Sell Their Souls if Romney Wins
An Interview With Ron Paul
The RWN Real-Estate Sale
RWN\'s Favorite Tony Robbins Quotes
Stop Apologizing for Being an American
The Amway Experience
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Advertisement
User Info