For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Democrats Already Planning For Lame Duck Session With 20 Bills
Written By : William Teach

They can see the writing on the wall that they will lose the House, and a slight change of losing the Senate. So, what do they do? Bow to the will of the People and take a break from their destructive legislative agenda? Yeah. Sure. Right. Like that’ll happen

Democrats are considering cramming as many as 20 pieces of legislation into the lame-duck session they plan to hold after the Nov. 2 election.

The array of bills competing for floor time shows the sense of urgency among Democratic lawmakers to act before the start of the 112th Congress, when Republicans are expected to control more seats in the Senate and House.

But, given the slow pace of the Senate, it also all but guarantees that Democrats will be hard-pressed to pass even a small part of their lame-duck agenda.

Thank God for small favors. The Republicans in the Senate need to work extra hard to gum up the works to avoid the hardcore leftist agenda.

So, what will the be pushing? Supposedly, they will attempt to pass their extension of the Bush tax cuts rates except for families and small businesses making more than $250K, further damaging small businesses and small business creation. You know. Jobs. Also, the DREAM Act and a repeal of DADT. DADT does actually have a chance of passing with Republicans in charge, once the military has returned all the information and made a determination, particularly the service chiefs. And when it is legislation on its own.

We also have a further extension of unemployment benefits, a freeze on medicare reimbursement cuts, tax cuts for teachers and other union/government workers, a renewable energy standard (read cap and tax), ratification of START, some food nanny stateism from Nancy Pelosi, and several more. Also

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) says he intends to hold Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to a promise to schedule a vote on legislation that would bar the Environmental Protection Agency from taking action to curb carbon gas emissions for two years.

Rockefellar has been waiting quite some time for that one, and, despite being popular, will never see the light of day, because Republicans would be overwhelmingly for it.

Notice something missing? If you guessed “where’s the budget?”, give yourself a pat on the back. They do plan on passing some stopgap measures this week, though

The Obama administration is asking lawmakers to include about $20 billion for Pell Grants, the cash-strapped Postal Service and the implementation of the healthcare and financial regulation reform bills, but that effort is running into opposition from Republicans who want a “clean” resolution.

Approval of the continuing resolution is necessary because Congress has not approved a single appropriations bill. The resolution would allow federal programs to operate at the spending levels of the previous year. The measure is a target for additional spending because it is probably the last vehicle that will be approved by Congress before the election.

Hey, what’s another $20 billion to this crew? No actual budget, but, let’s make sure we implement legislation that no one, including the people who are supposed to implement it, understand.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach. Re-Change 2010!

0
  • BIG_RWN

    I read somewhere that 3 states will send new Senators to Congress immediately after Nov. 2nd, Delaware, Illinois, & West Virgina. It is because of the current Senators being appointed, not elected. I do not know why Colorada and New York were not included in this list since they also have appointed Senators. This means that it is possible for the Dem majority in Congress can shrink a bit for the lame duck session.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/TheDark-Knight/100001438641512 TheDark Knight

    This has the feel of a high-school “parents are away” party where you are trying to evict the one person who did the most damage to your house… he/she finally agrees to leave and, as a parting gesture, vomits all over the foyer

    • Lee

      Good comparison, especially because you'd quickly realize how classless and clueless such a person really it.

      This raises a question on if citizens of a district/state can bring a civil suit against their outsted representative if that representative participates in such actions. The lawsuit is likely a non-starter, but it does bring up the valid point of asking why we wait so long between an election and the incoming person taking office (as well as how the outgoing person should finish their term). When the country was founded, the time period was required because it took that long to get to the capital by horseback. Since no members of Congress use that mode of transportation, what is the purpose of the delay?

    • StanW

      It actually sounds a lot like how the former Clinton Staffers left the “presents” in the White House for incoming George Bush.

      Infants will always be infants, not matter how old they get or how much power they have.

  • Trench_Raider

    This is not going to be popular with many here, but I can't really blame them for doing this. Were I in charge and felt that there was a good reason to believe that the world was about to fall down around my head and that my party was soon to be in the voting minority for at the very least two years (possibly even longer) I would probably make up a laundry list of things to try to acomplish while we still had the chance as well.

    What I do object to, of course, is the probable harmlful and disgusting content of the 20 bills the Dems have prepared.

    I've long said that if the adults take back control of both houses in November, the most dangerous time will be the lame duck sessions were they might try to push all sorts of unpopular far left idiocy through without having to worry about an election backlash. But at the same time I do have to wonder how much they can really get acomplished in such a short time. I mean for the better part of two years now, these clowns have had a sitting leftist president with a rubber stamp congress, but look low low they have been in passing what bills they have put forward through. They've had to fight tooth and nail to do what they little they have. (with members of their own party mind you, not the minority Republicans) So it's just as possible that after a Republican take-over the “lame duck” session will not be as bad as some predict. One of the main reasons might be opposition to such a last minute rush by Dems who remain in their seats who fear the backlash from voters the following election should they pull such a stunt.

    TR

    • Trench_Raider

      The above line should of course read “but look how long they have been taking in passing”

      I'm at a loss to explain that bit of confusion! ;-)

      TR

    • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

      I blame the idiots who voted them into power in the first place. Don't most people know that you don't give a child a book of matches to play with unless you really want the house burned down?

    • baoxian

      If Big is right and several states send Senators to DC immediately, it will make it very tough for the Dems to get anything done in a lame-duck session. It's doubtful that any Republicans will be crossing the aisle to vote for cloture on poison-pill bills in the Senate, and outgoing Speaker Pelosi won't have any power to threaten and cajole the House into working through the holidays.

      They won't get any major legislation through. Instead I see them doling out one last round of pork and payoffs along with some kind of irresponsible handout, probably crassly allocated to states and districts that kept Democrats in power.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com Martin Hale

    I'm surprised not to see EFCA on your list, William. I would have thought that one would be a natural for this lame-duck session. The union pensions “crisis” is probably no more than three years away (five years to reach truly catastrophic proportions) and it's likely that the Demicans won't have the sort of power needed to help out their union buddies within that time frame. Plus, the biggest fiscal damage to Social Security is going to happen within the same period of time (its the same root cause as the union pensions funding problem – Baby Boomer retirements), so Congress is going to have to prioritise its bailouts and the unions are going to find themselves in second place in that race.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Ed Klein on ‘The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House’

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info