Hacker To Distribute Confidential Hillary Clinton Emails On Benghazi


What’s in them? We don’t know yet. Will they be big? That remains to be seen, but why bother if they are tepid and meaningless?

(The Smoking Gun) Armed with confidential memos to Hillary Clinton that were stolen from the e-mail account of a former White House aide, a hacker has distributed some of the documents to a wide array of congressional aides, political figures, and journalists worldwide.

In a series of weekend e-mail blasts, the hacker known as “Guccifer” disseminated four recent memos to Clinton from Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime confidant of the former Secretary of State. (snip)

Most of the e-mail recipients were sent four separate memos that were e-mailed to Clinton by Blumenthal during the past five months. Each memo dealt with assorted developments in Libya, including the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi. One memo marked “Confidential” was sent to Clinton on September 12.

Now, according to this these are emails sent to Clinton, no mention of responses. And if they’re from the time period after the attack, what could they show? Perhaps the willingness to stonewall and obfuscate. Color me a bit skeptical. But, then, why bother if they are meaningless?

Of course, Liberals will say this is no big deal, because having our consulate attacked, burned, have Islamist flags raised above it, and 4 Americans killed, including our Ambassador, is much ado over nothing to them.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach.

Related Articles

0

Western States Finally Standing Up to Rapacious Federal Gov’t

The Federal government is quickly becoming an enemy to the people. One more example of that is its theft of

26

FCC To Vote On Net Neutrality Today, Create Problem Where None Existed

Liberals blame Bush era policies for the economic mess we’re in right now, as well as a raft of other

0

Surprise: Vulnerable Dems Work To Distance Themselves From “Affordable” Care Act

The same legislation all of them who were in office in 2010 voted for (The Hill) Vulnerable Democrats are scrambling