For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Humor Tuesday: Obama Convenes Panel To Find Solutions To The Budget Problems He Helped Create
Written By : William Teach

You do have to give Obama high chutzpah marks for pulling this stunt, though

Seeking to show he is serious about reining in soaring budget deficits, President Barack Obama on Tuesday will kick off the work of a panel he created to try to solve the nation’s fiscal woes.

Obama has given the independent, 18-member National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility broad leeway to suggest remedies for the debt and deficits.

A debate already has erupted over options the panel might consider, with conservatives urging that tax increases be ruled out and liberals seeking to shield the Social Security retirement program and other entitlement program from cuts.

The commission is due to convene at a White House event with Obama at 9:30 a.m. ET and hold the first of several monthly meetings afterward.

Obama has given the panel until December 1 to report back on its recommendations, enabling it to deliver its report after the November U.S. congressional elections.

Now, granted, Republicans under Bush were not exactly paragons of spending control, hence their low approval ratings from Conservatives. And Bush could have forced the Democrat controlled Congress to reduce spending during his last two years. That said, when Obama took over the White House with Democrats in full control of Congress, he apparently said “hey, Republicans, let me show you what out of control spending really looks like.” We then received the boondoggle know as Stimulus (which economists say failed). He signed a record high budget bill. He signed several special budget bills. As Karl Rove put it

….from the day Mr. Obama took office last year to the end of the current fiscal year, according to the Office of Management and Budget, the debt held by the public will grow by $3.3 trillion. In 20 months, Mr. Obama will add as much debt as Mr. Bush ran up in eight years.

Not that adding that much debt in 8 years was a great thing, do not misunderstand. Yet, Obama and the Donkey Party have taken it to a different level. When it comes to spending, they are a Jerry Rice compared to a Mario Manningham. Or, perhaps they are more like a Terrell Owens. Extremely talented, but, obnoxious and petulant. Either way, does anyone think that the answers to the budget problems will be “quit spending so darned much!”? Or, do we expect them to be “raise taxes along with implementing a VAT”? Democrats will not reign in any sort of spending. Remember that Pay-go rule they instituted, and then broke within 11 days? The one they have ignored ever since? Remember when Obama said he would go through the budget line by line and do away with pork? As Alexis de Tocqueville, not a particular fan of America, wrote

The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach

0
  • baoxian

    Obama is going to show he’s serious about the budget…by fobbing it off on a committee? And one that conveniently doesn’t return any results until after the next budget is passed, and not until after the election.

    Anybody or any organization that outsources their operating budget is doomed to fail. This isn’t a serious move by Obama, it’s him passing the buck again so he has somebody to blame. Along with being more evidence that he’s more interested in a Cloward-Piven economic collapse than he is in fixing the economy. All this ensures is that he has cover to ignore the issue for another seven months.

  • NorthernCanuck

    “Alexis de Tocqueville, not a particular fan of America,”

    Really? I’ve never read his book, just snips and reviews, it seemed he was quite impressed with America.
    Guess I’ll have to go to the horse mouth.

  • zimmy

    No mention of the financial predicament we found ourselves in as Obama became president. The situation was taken to a different level due to its severity.

    The real difference, though, is that the recovery act is investing in the sorely neglected infrastructure of this country so the money spent is an investment, rather than a gift for people already considered wealthy by our society’s standards.

  • StanInFtWorth

    No mention of the financial predicament we found ourselves in as Obama became president. The situation was taken to a different level due to its severity.
    Posted by zimmy 2010-04-27 09:28:10

    Obama has been President for over a year, he has enacted plans that affected the economy… HE MADE IT WORSE.

    Bush is not President, Zim. It’s time for your side to stop whining and take responsibility for your actions.

  • http://www.thepiratescove.us William_Teach

    Perhaps I should say that Tocqueville was rather skeptical about the American adventure in democracy, NorthernCanuck. He was a Frenchman, after all. I read his books long ago in political science class, and I came away with the notion that he didn’t care too much for for our experiment, perhaps because he was a Frenchman. Many of his quotes were not very complementary. The man was a great Classical Liberal, though, and had some great ideas.

  • Mr_e_m_t

    Zit, obamao has spent TRILLIONS of dollars already, we are in second year of his regime and as mentioned above, he is destroying America with his communist policies. Not one single policy or bill has been in anyway used to try to boost our private business that employs workers with non federal money.
    All that money blown out the window with roughly 30% or less of working Americans paying non fed income taxes… and it gets worse… yet it’s Bush’s fault?
    Who the hell do you seriously think buys that crap anymore?

    You claim you are a genius, we all have no problem disbeliving because you sit there claiming it’s Bush’s fault that the economy is trashed while obama spends hundreds of times more money than he receives?

    Seriously the current potus is a street corner crack pusher with a bently on 20′s blinged out on hydros thumpin down the street getting a wellfare check and you are claiming he can afford to pay for his ride with his food stamps and be honest.

    Btw, Bush drives a Ford truck.

  • tblrk2006

    The real difference, though, is that the recovery act is investing in the sorely neglected infrastructure of this country so the money spent is an investment, rather than a gift for people already considered wealthy by our society’s standards.
    Posted by zimmy
    2010-04-27 09:28:10

    Haha…….thats funny. Even the recovery website says that aint so. Can you say pork?

  • Regconservative

    [ liberals seeking to shield the Social Security]

    They did not worry when they cut 500 hundred BILLION from medicare !!!!!

  • Smithwick

    The equivalent of an alcoholic throwing his own intervention, then getting hammered and declaring that he is cured.

    You want to get us out of this financial boondoggle you’ve created? Stop trying to be president then! Don’t do a single thing. Go head in the whitehouse basement for the next 3 years and refuse to sign, support, or campaign for any new legislature.

    It won’t make things better but it will keep you from making things worse until we can get a competent president and congress to fix these mistakes.

  • baoxian

    “No mention of the financial predicament we found ourselves in as Obama became president.”

    Great men take action. Mediocre men blame their circumstances.

    Could you imagine if Ronald Reagan had said: “This Wall was here when I took office, but I’m going to convene a committee to see what we can do about it…seven months from now.”

    And you liberals wonder why Obama is a global laughingstock.

  • zimmy

    No point discussing this when baotian is completely clueless about the global perception of Obama. Rarely has a US president been so globally admired.

    Obama took action on the great recession he inherited. To ignore that it happened during Bush’s presidency is to be historically blind, another good reason to ignore bioxian.

  • Smithwick

    Rarely has a US president been so globally admired.

    And yet so despised by americans. Maybe we could trade Mr. O for something that we want from the rest of the world? Less terrorism perhaps? Or heck, we could just give him away if they want him so much. But we should look to get something out of it first.

    For sale: one historic first ever black president. Minor defect in the ear region, slight tobacco smell. Lightly used (you could barely tell he was ever employed!) Make me an offer (and absolutely no tradebacks).

    Will deliver.

  • LampofDiogenes

    “No point discussing this when baotian is completely clueless about the global perception of Obama. Rarely has a US president been so globally admired.”

    Zimwit(less),

    You say that like you think it’s a GOOD thing. Why, EXACTLY, should I give a husky fuck WHAT the Sudanese think of Teh One? They Kenyans? And if the “rank and file” Frenchmen or Englishmen or Germans seem to like Teh One, this is an opinion not shared by their leaders. Sarkozy, Putin, et al, think he’s a lightweight AND a glory hound (and they are right on both counts).

    “Obama took action on the great recession he inherited. To ignore that it happened during Bush’s presidency is to be historically blind, another good reason to ignore bioxian.”

    Yes, and as pointed out, he has made it WORSE – remember, his PROMISE for the stimulus was that IF we passed it, his administration would hold unemployment below 8.5%, but if we DIDN’T, it would to over 10. It’s BEEN at 10 (give or take less than 0.5%) since we passed his craptacular “stimulus” bill. And, YES, the recession started under Bush – but we only have Teh One to thank for extending and deepening it –

    another good reason to ignore YOUR stupid ass.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Rarely has a US president been so globally admired.

    Because citizens of foreign countries are such a crucial demographic in presidential elections.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

    To ignore that it happened during Bush’s presidency is to be historically blind, another good reason to ignore bioxian.
    Posted by zimmy
    2010-04-27 14:38:01

    To ignore the Democratic Party’s control of the purse strings of the US Government since January 2007 is either ignorance or a intentional ommission.

  • http://www.thepiratescove.us William_Teach

    We could trade Obama and a Congressmen to be named later to France for Sarkozy. Sarkozy may be still to the left, but, at least the guy has a clue, has experience, has a pair, and isn’t a bumbling idiot.

  • baoxian

    “Rarely has a US president been so globally admired.”

    By radical militant Muslims. I’ll give you that.

  • Mr_e_m_t

    You forgot the communist dictators too Baoxian

  • Smithwick

    We could trade Obama and a Congressmen to be named later to France for Sarkozy. Sarkozy may be still to the left, but, at least the guy has a clue, has experience, has a pair, and isn’t a bumbling idiot.

    And his wife is a lot easier on the eyes than Mrs. O.

Advertisement
Featured Video

If I Was Your President (Boyfriend Spoof)

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info