For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
I Agree: Birth Control COULD Save the Planet
Written By : Warner Todd Huston

This may shock many of my conservative fans, but I cannot remain quiet about my support for the singularly brilliant idea that Obama’s so-called science czar offered in the 1975 college textbook Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment. Birth control, it was theorized, could save the planet. I have to say that I wholeheartedly agree.

In 1975, John Holdren argued for a perfect way to save the planet. “Compulsory control of family size is an unpalatable idea,” Holdren wrote in 1975, “but the alternatives may be much more horrifying.”

In essence, Obama’s operative Holdren is saying that preventing new births is the best way to save the planet from an out-of-control humanity. And I have to say, I cannot disagree.

We need to get this idea out to everyone in Holdren and Obama’s fandom. It is simply undeniable logic that if Obamaites, liberals, socialists, greens, enviro-nazis, communists, Democrats and anti-Americans everywhere cease having babies, this planet will be much, much better off.

Imagine how wonderful the world would be without tyrants attempting to tell us how to eat, what to wear, how to shop, what we should be allowed to do for a living, what we should drive, or if we should drive at all. Imagine how great it would be if we were each responsible for our own selves and our families without the despotism of the good intentions of anti-capitalists, eco-scolds, big government pushers, union thugs, or the sort of jackbooted butinskis of Obama’s ilk!

It would be as close to nirvana as humans can get.

So, I agree with Holdren. Let’s make sure that liberals and leftists everywhere don’t have any more children. Let them die out like the dinosaurs. And what could be better than that they’d be doing it willingly. Who needs government rules and eugenics programs! Let the lefties commit generational suicide all on their own.

Yep, count me as one endorsing this plan. Let lefties everywhere stop having kids from this point forward. The voluntary final solution could be a sweet solution, indeed.

0
  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    So, I agree with Holdren. Let’s make sure that liberals and leftists everywhere don’t have any more children.

    I totally agree. On top of that, let them die instead of receiving health care in place of the more needy.

  • http://quantum-kitty.blogspot.com/ simulacre

    let them be human shields in Palestinian territory, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc; let them move to Africa and live technology, carbon emission, chemical and pesticide free lives; let them sterilize themselves and remove their genes from the pool…

  • rmiller

    So, I agree with Holdren. Let’s make sure that liberals and leftists everywhere don’t have any more children.

    Posted by Kingfisher

    2009-09-23 15:05:37

    LOl…that was so predictable. Here's the challenge for conservatives…

    Liberals and poor people are having children at a much higher rate that conservatives, (either in Europe or the US).

    Would conservatives advocate population control?

  • http://quantum-kitty.blogspot.com/ simulacre

    rmiller, that's statistically untrue. red states' birth rates are much higher than blue states' birth rates and the demographic with the highest birthrate in Europe is the ultra conservative Muslims.

    'Liberals' or as I'd prefer, leftists -more and more- think of children as a punishment or an inconvenience and therefore, are much more likely to abort their children or become DINKs never trying to have kids.

  • rmiller

    Yeah…The highest birthrates in Europe are among the ultra conservative muslims in Sweden and Norway and Holland.'

    What is statistically true,also, is that the poor of Europe and America are reproducing faster than the 'white' people.

    "liberals, or as I'd prefer, leftists" don't think of children as punishment or inconvenience….they think of them as a birthright.

    I ask again….would conservatives advocate population control?

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    What is statistically true,also, is that the poor of Europe and America are reproducing faster than the 'white' people.

    Because we all know it's simply impossible for a poor person to be conservative and/or white.

  • rmiller

    osted by mightysamurai

    2009-09-23 19:43:01

    Statistically…not impossible.

    Statistically…not likely.

    Poor people in all cultures are more likely to be 'liberal' than conservative. This isn't surprising.

  • Rickvid_in_Seattle

    And yet studies of self described conservatives and liberals in the US, at least, show that conservative households tend to be less monied than liberal households. See, facts do get in the way.

  • rmiller

    See, facts do get in the way.

    Posted by Rickvid_in_Seattle

    2009-09-23 21:21:03

    Not really, in fact they are helpful.

    I was responding to mightysamurai who claimed, sarcastically, that is was impossible to be poor, white and conservative.

    I claimed it wasn't impossible…just statistically unlikely.

    Your claim has nothing to do with that, as it does not show whether more poor households are liberal or conservative.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info