I think this is a fantastic point. Van Jones is a quitter. Well, that's what we kept hearing from the left about Palin.

Are you sure you want to compare VannieTruther with Palinneophyte?

One is a low level political appointed hack while the other was nominated for the GOP vp ticket.

I wouldn't even put the two on the same page but if you want to go ahead.

See what happens when you quit.

Posted by libliever

2009-09-07 08:16:11

You wanna try answering the question rather than pointlessly deflecting?

Palinneophyte

You're seriously claiming this is a question of competence? Really? You are that stupid? Sorry, I shouldn't formulate that as a question: you ARE that stupid.

Then, since Palin has way more experience than Obama, and you (with idiocy that borders on the masterful) claim that truther boy over there is more experienced than her, then why is the US president less prepared for his job than some "low ranking" appointee of his?

PS: the unelected position of "czar" is low level my ass.

I wouldn't even put the two on the same page but if you want to go ahead.

Yeah, you're absolutely right….Jones isn't even worthy to shine Palin's shoes. Thanks for pointing that out.

I am a little surprised that you consider Palin far better than Jones but people can change.

One is a low level political appointed hack while the other was nominated for the GOP vp ticket.

I wouldn't even put the two on the same page but if you want to go ahead.

See what happens when you quit.

Posted by libliever

2009-09-07 08:16:11

Yeah, Van Jones had those 15+ ethics complaints that cost over half a million dollars to fight, funded by a Democratic operative, however he was cleared in them. Oh wait…….

Nice try dufus. Jones got off light. Palin spent more time dealing with frivilous complaints than she could devote to her office. Jones, who was going to be given control of billions of dollars, is a racist and admitted communist.

Nice try, come back when you have a possible point.

One thing is for certain….the anti-Palin screwballs are coming out in force.

That's OK libliever. We all know Palin has far more courage and conviction than Jones will ever have. It's easy to tell who is the liberal….look for the one who acts like a little crybaby and blames everyone else.

look for the one who acts like a little crybaby and blames everyone else.

Posted by Kingfisher

2009-09-07 11:07:34

Sums up Palin pretty well King, it was the medias vault, she was just a poor victim. Yep a little crybaby, thanks for pointing that out.

Posted by whats_up

2009-09-07 11:58:48

Please point out where she was blaming the media or any one other than the people constantly filing bogus ethics charges for her decision, whatatard!!!

some liberal media labelled Palin a quitter – but most of the libs I know, and many of the lib commentators – thought Palin's quitting was a good thing – for Alaska.

Van Jones quitting is a good thing too – for the Obama Administration.

In both cases, a not-too-bright flame throwing loudmouth took themselves out of the game [ oh ... for those of you who think Palin is still in the game, just keep watching, she's not nearly smart enough to compete against the landsharks like Romney, Huckabee, Jindal, etc - by 2012 she'll be a political foornote]

Hoggo, just save yourself the humiliation and don't bother posting. Especially with different names and pretending that you're not a leftist.

One almost gets the impression you're pathological.

Posted by boatman47

2009-09-07 12:35:25

Yeah keep thinking that way and you'll be the political footnote of 2012!

she's not nearly smart enough to compete against the landsharks like Romney, Huckabee, Jindal, etc – by 2012 she'll be a political foornote

Oh, yes, look how that Romney shamed the Obama administration with the death panels… no, it was Huckabee. Definitely Jindal. Ron Paul? Ehhh, I forget. Which was it that is hated by liberals to Bush-levels and beyond?

, she was just a poor victim. Yep a little crybaby, thanks for pointing that out.

Posted by whats_up

2009-09-07 11:58:48

It is a proven fact that the bogus ethics complaints, initiated by a Democratic operative, cost the Palin's over a half million dollars. Don't let facts interrupt your pathetic life.

Boatman47 is another complete moron. He voted for Obama yet is an expert on conservatives. Probably another bitter same sex marriage supporter like crthns is.

That is, despite lib's attempt to brush it aside, a good point. If Palin was a quitter, doesn't that make Van one too?

"You wanna try answering the question rather than pointlessly deflecting?"

Since you asked nicely.

Of course, with the exception of extreme lefties, most dems could care less about Van Jones. He's become an unwanted sideshow. And besides Palin is a Repub of course dems are going to attack her for quitting so did some folks on the right btw. Why would the dems attack one of their own for doing the right thing ie get the hell out of the way of Obama's health-care reform?

"I am a little surprised that you consider Palin far better than Jones but people can change.

Posted by Kingfisher"

Duh. That's the point I've been trying to make. It's hard to give you guys a compliment. Although taking these two as example of quitters and making comparisons is again, just plain dumb.

Posted by smelvertising

2009-09-07 09:34:45

I would take a political neophyte over a truther any day.

You're correct that the left will not and cannot admit that, nor admit that the whole cry against Palin was mere political posturing, but I suspect the nation knows that already.

CT, it's not a matter of admitting this or that rather it is what it is.

Palin hurt herself and her party by quitting; hurt herself in the long run if she decides to run again and hurt the GOP in the short term. You guys need a Palin and you need her to be actively involved NOW not later on.

Compare and contrast to Vannie; he helped his party by quitting. He's not the darling of the left like Palin is to the right. He's a mid level (at best) polically appointed HACK truther who had to go.

There are no good parallels here.

Palin hurt herself and her party by quitting; hurt herself in the long run if she decides to run again and hurt the GOP in the short term. You guys need a Palin and you need her to be actively involved NOW not later on.

Wow, look, the first liberal to admit Sarah Palin is relevant. I'd say she showed her involvement by forcing the adminstration to remove the death panels, or whatever you want to call them. Even the NY Times admitted she did a good job on that with just a Facebook entry.

I would take a political neophyte over a truther any day.

So you'd take the first guy off the address book rather than a leftist party hack? I remind you, the attempt to make light of Van Jones once again proves that trutherism is mainstream among liberals, or at least not considered any sort of significant issue by the Obama administration who approved his position.

It still doesn't answer any question, challenge any of the points made, nor is it relevant to the topic.

He's not the darling of the left like Palin is to the right.

No, he's a personal Obama appointee with major, probably inconstitutional influence. That makes his beliefs far more worrisome and dangerous than former governor Palin's – if only because her beliefs are only offensive to liberal loafers, looters and losers.

He's a mid level (at best)

The amount of money he controls, plus the whole unelected, unvetted, possibly inconstitutional and certainly worrisome position of czar, which Obama is abusing to hell and back, would like to have a word with you on that.

If liberals keep pretending that czars are little more than irrelevant middle-management, things are going to take a very sour turn for them, very fast.

Sums up Palin pretty well King, it was the medias vault, she was just a poor victim. Yep a little crybaby, thanks for pointing that out.

2009-09-07 11:58:48

Interesting, considering that's not what I said. Do you need to have this translated to retard-speak?

Compare and contrast to Vannie; he helped his party by quitting. He's not the darling of the left like Palin is to the right. He's a mid level (at best) polically appointed HACK truther who had to go.

While blaming everyone else for him leaving.

Thank you for proving my point.

Of course, with the exception of extreme lefties, most dems could care less about Van Jones.

Then why did Obama's administration support Van Jones?

Dumbass.

He's become an unwanted sideshow.

You mean, like you?

And besides Palin is a Repub of course dems are going to attack her for quitting so did some folks on the right btw. Why would the dems attack one of their own for doing the right thing ie get the hell out of the way of Obama's health-care reform?

You mean, the health-care reform that nobody wants? The health-care reform passed by a dumbass president who's too stupid even to unite groups within his own party?

The fact that libliever is out desperately trying to defend Jones, it is obviously clear that the left is hurting over this one.

Jones is a quitter and it is another embarrassment to Hopey McChange.

Now leave libliever in peace to cry into his pillow. LOL!

He's a mid level (at best)

Who was not elected and not vetted, unlike Palin. Other than Obama, who approved Jones? Certainly not Congress nor the American people.