It’s Come To This: Komen Foundation Has To Do Damage Control
What kind of world are we living in where the Susan G. Komen Foundation has to do damage control for pulling funding from an organization that is under federal investigation for potentially using taxpayer money for abortions, financial abuses, and ignoring state and local reporting requirements, often regarding minors? Witness the Politico’s headline: Susan G. Komen fights to contain Planned Parenthood damage
If this was supposed to be damage control, Susan G. Komen for the Cure proved Thursday that it has a lot to learn.
On a day when the breast cancer charity’s top official made the rounds with the national media, insisting the organization’s decision to stop giving grants to Planned Parenthood wasn’t political, the firestorm only got worse. Top Democrats piled on; the head of the Komen chapter in Los Angeles quit; and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is giving a $250,000 matching gift to Planned Parenthood.
I’m not seeing what Komen did wrong; do you? I see that 22 Democrat Senators are choosing to whine about what a private corporation does with their money, without mentioning that PP is known mostly for abortions, not “breast exams”, and turning this political. Same with Bloomberg.
Brinker said there was broad consensus from Komen’s board over the new policies. Additionally, she said the charity was trying to refocus grants on providers that are able to perform mammography services rather than just breast screenings. Planned Parenthood does not have mammography equipment and refers women to providers for the service.
“We are the stewards of other people’s money, and we need to ensure that money is going to programs for women in the most impactful way,” Brinker said, echoing a statement she made on a YouTube video late Wednesday night.
I can see how that would upset liberals, who seem to expect Other People’s Money to be wasted, rather than being treated respectfully.
We also have a Memorandum pull of a story entitled “HOPE KILLS: Susan G Komen Foundation Would Rather Be Associated With A Handgun Than Planned Parenthood.” The author, Michael Brendan Dougherty, is whining about a Walther P22 that comes in pink, with part of the sales going to the Komen Foundation. Except, the gun is meant to protect the life of a woman. Liberals do not want women to have guns. Liberals want women to be raped, beaten, and die, apparently. The guns are also not performing abortions and killing unborn children, many of whom are female. Why do liberals hate women?
And then we have the whole “breast exam” thing. As Life News points out
During a conference call with reporters this afternoon, Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure CEO Nancy Brinker and President Elizabeth Thompson revealed the main reason why the Planned Parenthood abortion business lost its funding. It doesn’t do mammograms.
“It was nothing they were doing wrong,” Brinker explained. “We have decided not to fund, wherever possible, pass-through grants. We were giving them money, they were sending women out for mammograms. What we would like to have are clinics where we can directly fund mammograms.”
She added, later in the day on Twitter:, saying the money “will be invested in programs to serve low-income, uninsured and underinsured women.”
PP doesn’t offer mammograms. Let’s be honest, as Life News points out, they do do breast exams. But no mammograms. No PP abortion mills have the necessary medical devices on location. That said, the Left is not upset about Komen pulling funding to PP over breast exams, they are upset about Komen dissing the Left’s favorite abortion provider.
More: SGK supposedly caves, as they say they will amend their criteria to only include criminal investigations, and
Our only goal for our granting process is to support women and families in the fight against breast cancer. Amending our criteria will ensure that politics has no place in our grant process. We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities.
Make sure to read the whole thing at the link. But, consider, all it is saying, as Ed Morrissey points out, is that PP is eligible for future funding, not that that PP will necessarily get the funding, or at least the amounts it had been getting. Perhaps they will take the money and put it to the groups that actually provide mammograms. SGK had no idea the firestorm they would create when they decided to pull funding from PP, but, if any of them ever read the news, they should have. Never get in the way of Liberal causes, especially ones involving abortion and providing contraceptives to minorities: they will bury you personally.
FacebookTwitterEmail Tough choice for Progressives: stand with Michael Moore or Obama? (Hollywood Reporter) Michael Moore sees President Obama’s legacy as
FacebookTwitterEmail There’s a reason they call election time the “silly season”. Though, this is a bit beyond silly (Daily Caller)
FacebookTwitterEmail Republicans are now more concerned with the damage being dine by President Obama’s policies than they are with threats