For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
More Palin Bashing: How CNN Misleads With Headlines
Written By : Warner Todd Huston

CNN indulged a classic left media tactic by misleading with a headline in a recent piece on former Governor Sarah Palin. The headline, if read by itself, seems to be saying that Sarah Palin delivered a “gaffe-filled message,” when the truth is that her message talked about gaffes, but wasn’t “filled” with them per se. The effect was that the headline made Palin look worse than the story itself did. If all one read was the headline, one would get a far different opinion of what was going on than if one read the story that went with it.

On Nov. 26, CNN delivered this headline on its Political Ticker blog: Palin delivers a gaffe-filled message.

Think about that headline. Doesn’t it say to you that Palin delivered a bunch of gaffes in her message? If all you did was read that headline, you’d think she made a fool of herself with all sorts of incorrect statements in it. One suspects that CNN fully realized this fact.

The whole story arose after an appearance that Palin did on the Glenn Beck show last week. On that show, while speaking of the shelling that the North Koreans perpetrated on South Korea, Palin accidentally said that our allies were the North Koreans. Clearly she simply had a slip of the tongue and meant the South Koreans were our allies, not the North.

How am I so sure she knew the difference? Because not only did she quickly correct herself, but she had correctly identified which Korea was which multiple times in the minutes prior to her slip of the tongue. It wasn’t as if she mentioned the Koreas once and incorrectly at that. It is clear that she understands which is which.

Naturally in its report CNN forgot to mention that Palin was correctly identifying the Koreas multiple times before the gaffe.

In any case, after Palin got illicitly lambasted by the left for a simple slip of the tongue, she issued one of her famous Facebook posts in reply to her critics. In it Palin delineated many of the verbal gaffes that Barack Obama issued since he began running for president and pointed out that the Old Media never made a big deal about all these many gaffes made by Obama.

So, let’s get back to that headline, “Palin delivers a gaffe-filled message.”

While it is strictly true that Palin’s Facebook message is filled with gaffes, it is not a “gaffe filled message” in the way that the phrase is generally used. After all if someone says that one issued a “gaffe filled message” people assume that the person issuing the message is making multiple gaffes in that message. They don’t immediately assume that said message contains a list of someone else’s gaffes. They assume that the message issuer is making mistakes.

This notion is, of course, what CNN hoped to promulgate. They hoped to fool people that only read headlines into thinking that Palin made multiple gaffes in a message. This headline was meant to bash Sarah Palin.

Sadly, misleading with a headline is a very common Old Media tactic. They can bash with a headline — all the while assuming a large percentage of their readers will read just the headline and skip the story — and still claim to be giving “the whole story” by adding a story that seems to contradict the headline.

0
  • RBC47

    Any pulbic figure who talks a lot commits gaffes, and anyone with any common sense does not regard them as very important. Palin babbles more than most, so commits more gaffes than most. No big deal.

    Palin’s problem is not how she says things but what she says. She runs around mouthing off conservative talking points and – usually – reducing them to catchy but simplistic one-liners. Sarah Palin is the all-time queen of bumper sticker politics. There is no substance behind her public personality.

    Those who support her as a candidate for President in 2012 are wasting their time. Sarah Palin has no chance. She is too superficial and too disorganized. More serious candidates will disembowel her in the primaries. she will, however,succeed in draining manpower, money, media attention and political support from other conservatives.

    • Anonymous

      Nixon can hear the piss running down your leg. You should learn to control your fear. Don’t worry, Obama iwll be fine as a private citizen after January 2013. ANd your vote for Obama merely proved your personal failings, nothing more.

      Fear. It makes Nixon laugh. At you.

      • Anonymous

        You betcha.

    • Guest

      You betcha I am in full support of Palin running for office in 2012. Back to the article; do you think CNN is just trying to be like someone else?
      http://nation.foxnews.com/joe-biden/2010/11/01/biden-makes-two-gaffes-one-speech

      • Anonymous

        Of course, the difference is that Biden actually compared the GOP to Asian drug gangs. Palin mixed up the words ‘north’ and ‘south’, then immediately corrected herself.

        • Guest

          In the transcript I read, Beck corrected her, then she corrected herself. Was the transcript wrong? Or did she commit the same gaffe more than once? I don’t know that Biden’s comments were so much a gaffe, as an analogy.

      • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

        Did you have a point or were just trying to tell us something we already know: Biden’s an idiot?

    • Don_cos

      reducing them to catchy but simplistic one-liners

      Maybe she just wants to make sure that you can understand them.

      There is no substance behind her public personality.

      Sounds more like Obama than Palin.

    • Don_cos

      reducing them to catchy but simplistic one-liners

      Maybe she just wants to make sure that you can understand them.

      There is no substance behind her public personality.

      Sounds more like Obama than Palin.

    • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

      Shut up, hoggo. Nobody cares what you think.

    • Anonymous

      Flagged for trolling, idiocy, and being the oft-banned Groundhog troll.

      TR

    • Anonymous

      “Any pulbic figure who talks a lot commits gaffes”

      pulbic figure? Bwahahaha.

      Were you a conservative figure of note the headline would be: RBC47 delivers spelling error and racism filled rant.

    • rjschwarz

      RBC47 perhaps she speaks in bumper sticker slogans because the audience for what she says is already informed on the issue and doesn’t need a long droning discussion on it over and over again, they just need to know where the speaker stands on the issue. That is how politic speech works.

    • Anonymous

      Palin’s problem is not how she says things but what she says.

      Yes, I agree. If Palin were a liberal spouting liberal rhetoric, the media would be covering for her night and day.

      Thank you for agreeing that CNN is blatantly biased against conservatives.

  • Anonymous

    Sadly, misleading with a headline is a very common Old Media tactic.

    I didn’t realize Van Helsing was Old Media.

  • Anonymous

    Sadly, misleading with a headline is a very common Old Media tactic.

    I didn’t realize Van Helsing was Old Media.

    • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

      What does VH have do with this thread? Or are you just trolling again?

      • Anonymous

        Do you really need me to spell out for you how Van Helsing misleads with his headlines all the time?

        • StanW

          Are you trying to take D-Vega’s man from him, Pinko? This is not a Van Helsing thread, yet you bring him up?

          Vega is NOT going to like this!

        • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

          So you’re posting off topic, and trolling, since this isn’t a VH thread?

        • Anonymous

          *TR notes pothead’s silence when faced with my post above*
          Yeah, that’s what I thought…

          TR

          • Anonymous

            Which post are referring to? I sort mine by oldest first, so when you say “faced with my post above” you might actually be referring to a post that I see *below.*

            Is it the one that starts off “Actually son…..?” If so, then what exactly am I responding to?

          • Anonymous

            That’s the very one and that’s what I’m talking about.
            You can’t effectively reply to my refutation of you silly statements about my flagging troll like you because I think I’m the “hall monitor”, etc.

            Now run along.

    • Anonymous

      Falgged for trolling and stupidity. Van Helsing did not author this piece.

      I see that Tom_Pothead_Delay has been hitting the dope early in the day again…

      TR

      • Anonymous

        Flagged for inflated sense of self-importance.

        • Anonymous

          You really have been hitting the dope this morning if you fail to see how stupid the “you flagged me, you big meanie? Well…well..I’ll just flag you back!!” sort of post makes you look.

          But that really is no suprise. You have been embarrasing yourself on an international level for several years now.

          TR

          • Anonymous

            Actually TR, the embarrassing part of this all is that you flag people in the first place, and that you fancy yourself as some kind of self-appointed school monitor.

            You actually think I flagged you back for some kind of revenge? (Side note, I didn’t even actually push the ‘flag’ button) Wow, man, you missed the boat there.

          • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

            Still doesn’t make your original post anything other than trolling.

          • Anonymous

            Actually, son, I flag people who deserve it due to their behavior. (such as your out of place troll post above) I often (but not always) announce it when I do so because I think it’s important that those who are flagged know that some of us here are willing to report them.
            I’m no one special and I don’t consider myself a “monitor” or whatever. I just enjoy this community and care about it’s health. So I use the “flag” button to report misbehavior such as trolling. It’s a tool that RWN and Disqus has given us for a reason. It’s there to be used.
            In reality flagging a troll post is like picking up the phone and dialing 911 to report a crime in progress.

            and….

            You actually think I flagged you back for some kind of revenge?

            No, not really.
            I thought that in your drug clouded haze you felt you were being “clever” or “witty”. Instead you just made yourself look like an idiot.

            Side note, I didn’t even actually push the ‘flag’ button

            Good.
            Then you are not quite as stupid as I feared you might be. A couple of weeks agot Hawkins came on and threatened those who persisted in flagging posts out of hand with banning. I did some reaseerah and it seems that when you press the flag button, the Disqus software send an email alert to either site owner or a third party email (presumably a moderator). Presumably Hawkins got tired of the flood of emails he was getting and warned us all against flagging posts that were not offensive, trolls, etc. (at the same time he gave the green light to blanket flag returning bannees such as groundhog and Martha…but that’s another topic)
            So it looks like for once you did the right thing, sport. Now if you will just put down that pot other aspects of your life might improve!

            TR

    • Anonymous

      So you put CNN on par with an a blog that openly admits it’s political leanings?

      Well except for the ‘openly admits’ part I think that’s a fair comparison: CNN is essentially a leftwing blog that refuses to come out of the closet.

    • Guest

      Tom, you didn’t have to use Van, although appropriate and not off topic when the comment is about “…Misleads with Headline.” Warner can attest to correcting a couple of articles himself for misrepresenting fiction for fact. Isn’t that correct Warner? Liable is a strong persuader; isn’t that right Warner?

    • Guest

      Tom, you didn’t have to use Van, although appropriate and not off topic when the comment is about “…Misleads with Headline.” Warner can attest to correcting a couple of articles himself for misrepresenting fiction for fact. Isn’t that correct Warner? Liable is a strong persuader; isn’t that right Warner?

      • Anonymous

        Trolling and personal attacks on the guest blogger (not to mention being an un-registered coward….that is to say not a legitimate member of the forum) flagged.

        TR

        • Guest

          Now what are you whining about? If you don’t believe me ask Warner, you know, the individual taking credit as author of this article. No attack, just facts about some of his past articles. Articles he has taken upon himself, once pointed out, to correct. Trench, do you have anything relevant to add to the comment section? Do you have any purpose other than being the flagging popo? I acknowledged that we are all aware that you are a “member.” Now it is time for you to accept that when this blog invites people to comment, they will. If John doesn’t want people to comment, then remove the comment section.

          • Anonymous

            “popo”…yeah that says alot about you.

            Yes, the blog invites comments. But it also has a set of rules that we all must abide by. Look at the link that says “FAQ” above. it specificly bans the sort of trolling you engage in every time you post.

            Not that I really think that will have much effect upon you. Leftists are children who never grew up, and thus hate rules and the idea of anyone reining in their bad behavior.

            TR

          • Guest

            What do you think “popo” says about me other than you don’t deserve the dignity of being called police. You call posters cowards, something I guarantee you wouldn’t do to my face, and yet we aren’t the ones retreating to an echo chamber fearful of others opinions. I am beginning to wonder if Trench Raider might not be a euphemism.

  • Don_cos

    How CNN Misleads With Headlines

    You could save yourself a lot of time and effort if you simply wrote when CNN didn’t mislead.

    • Anonymous

      They’re usually fairly honest when reporting the weather, or sports.

  • Don_cos

    How CNN Misleads With Headlines

    You could save yourself a lot of time and effort if you simply wrote when CNN didn’t mislead.

  • rjschwarz

    Headlines are typically written or rewritten by editors. Initially I believe it was done to tailor the headline to the location in the newspaper. Now it is clearly designed to be eye grabbing and occasionally misleading. I’ve read of journalists complaining about this sort of thing before.

  • President Friedman

    New headline just up at CNN:

    Huston Shrugs Off Palin Gaffes

    ;-)

  • Proud Infidel

    When we eat, we have to endure the so-called “news” played on the few chow hall TV sets from the BBC, SkyNews, et.al., and they’re even more milquetoast liberal than CNN. If Gov. Palin is gaffe-prone, what does that make John “Lurch” Kerry, Al Gore Jr., VP Joe Biden,……..

  • Proud Infidel

    When we eat, we have to endure the so-called “news” played on the few chow hall TV sets from the BBC, SkyNews, et.al., and they’re even more milquetoast liberal than CNN. If Gov. Palin is gaffe-prone, what does that make John “Lurch” Kerry, Al Gore Jr., VP Joe Biden,……..

  • Polkem

    Palin is a gaffe. She offered herself up to serve the people of Alaska for four years. They accepted the idea that she be nominated for Vice President of the United States. But to abandon her post as Governor to cash-in is a sign of her bad character.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info

Users Online