NY Times “Worried” Over Iraq Elections And Democracy


Here we go. Wait for the punchline

The latest election results in Iraq point to a heated and possibly lengthy power struggle between the Shiite coalition led by Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki and the rival secular slate led by Ayad Allawi.

That is not a surprise, but it is still worrying. There is much unfinished business awaiting the new Parliament and prime minister, including an equitable oil law and a fair resolution of Kurdish and Sunni Arab claims to Kirkuk. And there are less than six months before all American combat troops are scheduled to withdraw. Iraqis and Americans both need a swift and legitimate transition to a new government in Baghdad.

In the horse-trading to choose a prime minister, Iraq’s leaders must now look beyond their sectarian and ethnic bases and show that they have the skill and the vision to govern all of Iraq.

Hmm. I wonder if the Fish Wrap is concerned with things like this, which the Washington Post just noticed, all these weeks later

After laying the groundwork for a decisive vote this week on the Senate’s health-care bill, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested Monday that she might attempt to pass the measure without having members vote on it.

Will we see an editorial, the official position of the NY Times, telling Democrats they must look beyond their progressive and interest group bases show that they have the skill and vision to govern?

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove

Related Articles

0

Obama’s New ‘Nudge Squad’ To Secretly Push You to Do His Bidding

President Obama has failed in many ways to get Americans to follow along with his giant government, Big Brother ways.

5

House Passes Nationalized Healthcare: Here’s How They Voted

The Clerk of the House has posted the roll call of votes for the House on HR3962, the House healthcare

2

An Open Letter to the Occupiers from Generation X

To the Occupy movement: I know some of you mean well. I even share some of your concerns. The dismal