For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Obama Abandons Abused Women in Afghanistan
Written By : Warner Todd Huston

President Barack Obama is putting the finishing touches on making a mockery out of the unsupportable claim that Democrats care about women’s rights by his signal to the Afghan Taliban, warlords, strongmen, militias, and tribal leaders that he’s ready to negotiate with anyone there in order to smooth his efforts in that troubled region.

President Obama is letting it be known that he’s prepared to cut deals with the Taliban in order for Afghan warlords to cut ties with al Qaeda. Obama thinks he can work with the supposedly “moderate” Taliban groups in Afghanistan in a bid to oust al Qaeda. A Taliban moderate. What sort of mythical creature is this?

One thing is sure, however, if Obama turns Afghanistan back over to the Taliban and other Islamic warlords in an effort to make it appear as if he’s had success there, women will be the hardest hit. The possibility that Obama will abandon Afghanistan’s women frightens Wazhma Frogh, an Afghan women’s advocate who received the U.S. State Department’s 2009 International Woman of Courage Award.

As an Afghan woman who for many years lived a life deprived of the most basic human rights, I find unbearable the thought of what will happen to the women of my country if it once again falls under the control of the insurgents and militants who now threaten it.

Since the American efforts in Afghanistan began women have been most favorably affected. Human rights for women have advanced immeasurably there since 2001 but much, much more needs to be done. After all, centuries of abuse and entrenched attitudes that women are barely even human have to be overcome. That doesn’t happen in so short a time unless support for change is upheld and if the U.S. leaves Afghanistan all support for change will go with it.

The world community has focused on women’s rights in Afghanistan since 2001, but that focus will dim and disappear if the west is no longer heavily engaged there. As Frogh said in the Washington Post, if the west disengages in Afghanistan and allows militant, extremist groups like the Taliban to take over once again, it will “raise questions about the commitment of Western democracies to such rights and to democratic values.”

It won’t take long for women to be negatively affected by a return to the Taliban’s control.

Bearing in mind how fragile the Afghan government is at this moment, it will not take long for the country’s women to come under attack again. The consequences will be even more bitter this time because no matter how limited our success, we have at least managed to act in the forefront of public life in Afghanistan. We have had a taste of what it’s like to have rights.

This is what Obama is sentencing Afghani women to. Second class (or worse) status, beatings, forced use of the burka, continued genital mutilation, rape, and abuse is what the future once again holds for Afghan women if Obama has his way.

And what will Obama get out of it? An easier political situation with his own extremist political supporters in the U.S. and little else. Obama is willing to throw away the progress that women have made in Afghanistan and any possibility that such progress will continue to grow for a little political success in America. What could be more disgusting? And what could better prove the lie to Obama’s pretense that he and his party much care about women’s rights?

0
  • D-Vega

    A Taliban moderate. What sort of mythical creature is this?

    It is part of the same genus as "A Moderate Baathist".

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    Given that Afghanistan passed a law just last year that a man can beat a wife if she doesn't put out for him when he wants it, it's a safe bet to assume that Ms. Frogh has a damn good point. But those Afghani women will crunch and pop under the wheels of the Obama leviathan just as loudly as will the Tibetans who have the temerity to think that Tibet should be a free nation and the Iranians who had the chutzpah to contend that elections should free and fair.

  • BIG

    What I find ironic about the turnabout by the Obama administration on the Afghan government is because of what they are saying is a corrupt election. Here we have a bunch of Chicago politicians claiming somebody else is running a hoax election? That is rich. I am sure Axelrod could go over to Afghanistan and show them how to run an election Chicago style.

    It is not only the woman that will suffer because of Obama's mideast plans. But Anita Dunn will move Barack Obama up in her estimation when the death toll created in his wake approaches that of her favorite philospher. But don't worry, they will just blame it all on Bush.

  • tazzmax

    test

  • aharris

    The left only cares about the suffering of oppressed people as long as our military or other power isn't actually there trying to influence real change for the better. How else do you explain their tireless carping about Darfur? Do you actually think they'd support any real attempt to change that situation?

Advertisement
Featured Video

Debbie Spend-it-now is selling America’s future to the Chinese

php developer india
Previous Features

Ads

Five Ways Conservatives Will Have to Sell Their Souls if Romney Wins
An Interview With Ron Paul
The RWN Real-Estate Sale
RWN\'s Favorite Tony Robbins Quotes
Stop Apologizing for Being an American
The Amway Experience
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Advertisement
User Info