For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
ObamaCare Failing On Deadlines, Costs
Written By : William Teach

It’s been awhile since we talked about President Chumps outsourced “historic” legislation. Since it has been passed, there have been stories, but, they have been low key, and tend to be somewhat buried. Like this one

Three months after the $940 billion health care bill was signed into law, questions abound about whether the Obama administration can meet all the deadlines in the massive law while dealing with the political pressures of Congress.

Being president is haaaaawd work! What with all the golf, concerts, dates with the wife in other cities, ducking the media, blame-storming, and those other small issues, like Afghanistan and the BP oil spill, Barry just doesn’t have the time to read the legislation and get ‘er done.

Meanwhile, the impact on Americans’ health insurance costs remains negligible, and premiums are actually rising as many Americans lose their coverage in a troubled job market.

Soooooo, it is not working as advertised? I’m wondering if anyone brought that up at some point.

Republicans have accused the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) of missing key deadlines, such as one requiring the establishment of an advisory committee for an advertising campaign to educate young women about breast cancer. The deadline was May 22, but members have yet to be selected.

Got that? Republicans are being blamed for daring to mention that HHS can’t even get an advertising campaign in place. Bad Republicans!

HHS was also ordered to establish a government task force by May 7 to come up with a strategy to improve health care programs in Alaska. The agency has moved forward in the process but the task force hasn’t been selected yet.

I blame George Bush. Thought, HHS has met a few deadlines, such as

The requirement allowing young adults under age 26 to stay on their parents’ health plans has also been implemented ahead of schedule.

Oh, good! Because it was really difficult to to tell insurers that “you must let children stay on their parents insurance till age 26.” Especially since at least 30 states had already passed laws with the same requirement.

“The average rule takes 18 months, which means that there are many of those that take two or three years to do, because they have controversy or they require integration with some other rulemaking process. So this is a tsunami of rulemaking that has tipped the Department of Health and Human Services,” said Michael Leavitt, HHS secretary under former President George W. Bush.

Good thing the ObamaCare legislation isn’t super-massively long or anything, otherwise, this could force government employees to actually work long hours.

You know that the 10% tanning tax will be implemented on time starting July 1, though. And tanning salons start laying off employees and closing shop July 2.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach

0
  • http://conservativebootcamp.com Martin Hale

    Because it was really difficult to to tell insurers that “you must let children stay on their parents insurance till age 26.”

    As someone who has his hands on managing a large health plan, the requirement to keep children on a health plan through age 26 is actually not a bad deal for employers also. For most employee groups, having more younger, healthier people enrolled in a health plan brings the premium rates down for everyone because those kids tend to be the most actuarially sound people in the group and having more people in the pool spreads the costs across more people who're contributing to the pool. The law doesn't say employers have to pay the costs of insuring 18-26 year-olds, just that they provide them access to the health plan. Employers can easily shift the majority, if not all, of the cost burden onto the parents/kids.

    As an example of how those young adults affect rates, last year, our group faced the loss of all of our residents and interns from our health plan to a health plan run by their union. Losing them from our health plan would have raised our premium rates by 39%, if we'd been unable to convince them to stay in our plan. And I did that by pointing out to them that leaving our plan would cost us an additional $3.5MM in new and unbudgeted health plan expenses, which in a year in which we lost >$26MM in state funding of Medicaid, was going to result in layoffs, inevitably including some resident and intern FTE's. They saw the light, finally, and decided to stay put.

    Of course your point about 30 states having passed similar legislative initiatives already is well-taken. This was an easy deadline to meet because the bar was set so low.

  • UFKA_Smithwick

    Time to reset the goal posts.

    Obamacare was never intended to lower costs or increase availability you see, it was only intended to make things more fair for the little guy. The administration knew from day one that it would be expensive and efficiency might suffer, but isn't that cost worth it to live in a more level society?

Advertisement
Featured Video

If I Was Your President (Boyfriend Spoof)

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info