Obama’s Pentagon Preparing to Use Military to Put Down ‘Civil Unrest’
Obama’s Pentagon is now studying “civil unrest” in this country and others looking for ways that the military can be used to understand, predict, and to put a stop to political protests, both non-violent and violent ones.
We all should understand the desire that militaries have to study this field, of course. After all, security is their game. But it also should make ALL of us uneasy that our government is looking into ways to stop us from indulging our First Amendment rights.
A US Department of Defense (DoD) research programme is funding universities to model the dynamics, risks and tipping points for large-scale civil unrest across the world, under the supervision of various US military agencies. The multi-million dollar programme is designed to develop immediate and long-term “warfighter-relevant insights” for senior officials and decision makers in “the defense policy community,” and to inform policy implemented by “combatant commands.”
Launched in 2008–the year of the global banking crisis–the DoD ‘Minerva Research Initiative’ partners with universities “to improve DoD’s basic understanding of the social, cultural, behavioral, and political forces that shape regions of the world of strategic importance to the US.”
Among the projects awarded for the period 2014-2017 is a Cornell University-led study managed by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research which aims to develop an empirical model “of the dynamics of social movement mobilisation and contagions.” The project will determine “the critical mass (tipping point)” of social contagians by studying their “digital traces” in the cases of “the 2011 Egyptian revolution, the 2011 Russian Duma elections, the 2012 Nigerian fuel subsidy crisis and the 2013 Gazi park protests in Turkey.”
Twitter posts and conversations will be examined “to identify individuals mobilised in a social contagion and when they become mobilised.”
One interesting question that the studies addressed was why some people turn to terrorism while others in the same movement don’t, even though the non-violent actors seem to be just like those who turn to violence. Why some do and others don’t is an interesting question, to be sure.
But the whole enterprise only lends credence to the idea that our government is setting itself up as our lord and master and not an entity controlled by we the people.
Remember what Thomas Jefferson once wrote in a letter to Roger Weightman:
“The palpable truth is that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of god.”
Facebook62.5kTwitter75Email1 Considering how often we see horrific stories of animals being abused and murdered by sadistic monsters, it’s a nice break to see the often unnoticed acts of kindness towards...Read More
Warner Todd Huston
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago-based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com, BigJournalsim.com and all Breitbart News' other sites, RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, and many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs across the country to discuss his opinion editorials and current events as well as appearing on TV networks such as CNN, Fox News, Fox Business Network, and various Chicago-based news programs. He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions : EMAIL Warner Todd Huston and follow him on Twitter, on Google Plus , and Facebook.
FacebookTwitterEmail Obama is an autocrat. Were we a South American nation he’d be our Hugo Chavez. He is not interested
FacebookTwitterEmail All during the 2012 election for President of the United States, Mitt Romney claimed he wanted to “repeal” Obamacare.
FacebookTwitterEmail Voting for this guy is functionally and morally no different than voting for a leader of the Ku Klux