For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Sarah Palin More Popular With Liberals Than Conservatives. No Joke.
Written By : Alex Nobles

No, this is not meant to be a joke. Perhaps obsessed should replace popular in the title. Part of my job is to scour the web and to see what people are talking about. While I was browsing Democratic Underground today (extremely liberal forum,) I realized these people are obsessed with Palin. I do not mean a post here or there, I mean the forum is almost entirely devoted to Sarah Palin bashing. Looking at the most popular forum threads of the day, almost all of them are about Sarah Palin. You would think they might be debating global warming, nope… all they can talk about is Sarah Palin. Perhaps hating Sarah Palin is the only thing that can keep the ultra left on “friendly” terms with each other. That and hating Glenn Beck.

Read the rest here at Political Lore Blog

0
  • CoolCzech

    Well, without a doubt liberals seem far more convinced of Palin’s presidential chances than many a conservative, myself included. My, how the poor things fret about Sarah!

    But tell you what: if the primaries were TODAY (always a big “if”), Palin would wipe the floor with Romney and Huckabee. And if unemployment is still around 9 to 10 percent come 2012, whoever the Republican is will bounce Obama out of the white house on his scrawny little non-white ass.

  • democratsarefascists

    I’ve said this since the day after her speech.

    It’s impossible to miss the expression on their faces when they talk about her.

    They are TERRIFIED of Sarah Palin.

    Because they know she can win.

    She is the genuine article. A representative of the American people. She’s not the poser Obama is and they know it.

    Their squirmy, yellow Democrat guts are twisted in knots over her.

  • Palin_will_lose

    Sarah is like a huge 5 car pile up on the freeway. You dont want to look but you do.

    Nobody is terrified of Palin unless she wins :( Then its see ya in Mexico baby. I really really want her to run. I do, it would be a blood bath.

  • vune

    Conservatives try not to pay too much attention to Sarah Palin because the closer you look, the harder it is to support her. When conservatives talk about her, it’s usually in the context of how much liberal hate she brings to the table.

    When someone points out that she’s lied about something, conservatives will never defend her. Instead, they’ll attack the source.

    I think it’s fitting that there’s an ad for the story “The Power of a Woman’s Beauty” on the right. Support RWN, & click on this story. It might enlighten you as to why Palin polls so much better with men than women.

  • BIG

    Of course Liberals hate Sarah Palin. Her life stands as proof of everything Liberals are against. Here we have a woman that made it on her own unlike Pelosi or Hillary that married for their power. She is a mother that did not abort her children. She is pretty hot looking (again compare with Hillary and Nancy). She fights back on her own instead of relying on community organizations to do her fighting.

    Of course the left hates her. SHe doesn’t need them to show a woman can make it in this world on her own.

  • Jack Schite

    Liberals don’t hate palin. They know she is a media celebrety. If anything palin is an example of the republicans sinking further than they did with Bush. She’s so completely unqualified it’s scary.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Posted by Palin_will_lose
    2009-11-28 00:08:39

    Posted by vune
    2009-11-28 08:32:57

    Posted by Jack Schite
    2009-11-28 09:39:40

    Waah, waah, waah. The poor troll babies are all upset.

  • Palin_will_lose

    Posted by mightysamurai
    2009-11-28 10:17:29

    Im not mad sami. Even if you keep telling me I am. I want her to run so after she loses. I can tell you to shove it up your ass :)

    I pitty the section of America who loves her. They are the same section that liked bush because he was a guy you could drink a beer with. We now see how well what played out.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Im not mad sami.

    You just keep telling yourself that.

  • Tennwriter

    That was one of the earlier arguements for Obama. He was a guy you could sit down and have a beer with. Hence, later, the Beer Summit.

    I’m not sure I’d be comfortable sitting down with the Palins and having a drink. They’re uber in the ordinary sense, and I’m at best slightly elite.

    I might feel less intimidated by meeting with President Obama because I suspect I’m smarter and tougher (if not more politically smooth) than he is. With the Palins, thats probably not true in any case. And this is part of the problem with the liberals who sneer at Sarah Palin.

    She’s almost certainly physically tougher, smarter, better looking, more knowledgeable, etc., etc. than ninety-five percent of her critics. What her critics are trying to argue is ‘Only knowledge gotten the way I got it is True Knowledge.’.

    Unfortunately for them, its a great American tradition that book learning is inferior to actual experience. And to add the icing to the cake, she’s more book learned than most of her attackers as well.

    This brings me to my last point. Its not that we the conservatives hate elites. Its that our elites are so terribly pathetic. “Respect and fear me.” Bleats the inbred, mutant sheep, and when we shake our heads and laugh, they cry that we are anti-intellectual.

    Conservatism is neither elitist nor populist. It uses what works. In this day, in this time, that’s populism.

  • Realpolitik

    Posted by Tennwriter
    2009-11-28 12:33:03

    Ah – Tenn is a satirist. Applause!

  • Palin_will_lose

    “She’s almost certainly physically tougher, smarter, better looking”
    Posted by Tennwriter
    2009-11-28 12:33:03

    OK I have to ask how is being better looking, have anything to do with anything. How will having a nice ass = the ability to run a country, state or a Burger King for that matter?

    Funny stuff Tennwriter

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Sarah Palin is roughly the same political fire power as Barack Obama was – thus the GOP sent carpetbagger Alan Keyes in to try to stop him because they could see a rising star. They failed.

    The left sees the same thing in Palin and is doing everything – no matter how low, lying, or unspeakable – to stop her. They’re failing.

    Their fear is palpable.

  • BRwoman

    What I don’t understand is why soooo many liberals spend their time on predominately conservative sites. I’ve tried reading the Huffpo, politico, etc., but quickly realized that I wouldn’t waste my time commenting on the garbage from the libtard sites. These libs are amusing though – so afraid of a woman that’s not even in a political power position (at least not yet!!!).

  • arthur_branch

    In a nutshell… libs hate Palin because they scared to death she will do a Ronald Reagan on their worthless butts. The O’ssiah is turning out to be another Carter and the American people are getting tired of his community organizer ass, the lib dems in congress are overstepping their perceived mandate, and finally they see the writing on the wall for another big change in the landscape of American politics and it scares them to death! They now know they are in the minority among the American population and that fear another 15 years in the political wilderness.

    Wait until the 2010 election cycle and watch the lib’s head explode.

  • gfchicago

    “I pitty the section of America who loves her. They are the same section that liked bush because he was a guy you could drink a beer with. We now see how well what played out.”

    Posted by Palin_will_lose
    2009-11-28 11:36:57

    Yeah just like Obambi, remember the beer summit? Him calling out Sean Hannity about having a beer together, gee what ever happened with that?

    Just like mighty told you, keep telling yourself that.

  • Bill_Dalasio

    The disdain expressed for Ms. Palin on the left and substantial portions of the right is little more than a cultural pose. In terms of policy, Ms. Palin is essentially, while largely populist in tone, a pragmatic, small-government conservative. In terms of her record, she seems to have had a fairly successful tenure, breaking a political machine’s control over Alaska’s politics, renegotiating the terms of the state’s oil leases on favorable terms, and successfully negotiating a multinational deal to begin a natural gas pipeline. All in all, what we see is a politician that, while not superman, has every reason to be taken seriously as part of the political process and is certainly not a bogeyman in any meaningful sense.

    However, Ms. Palin exudes the image of the petit bourgeoisie, of the Wal-Mart. A significant portion of the population (highly correlated with those holding liberal views, but nevertheless also including many conservatives) has invested themselves as belonging to a class that views itself as intellectually and socially superior to this class. Now, there is very little evidence to support this presumption of intellectual and cultural superiority. Many are little more than intellectual mediocrities and second-rate pseudo-sophisticates. But, the actual truth or falsehood of the presumption is of less importance than its belief. Its adherents have to view themselves as superior to the petit bourgeois other, lest they view themselves as failures by their own standards.

    As a result, it is necessary for the members of this class to express disdain and contempt for Ms. Palin. To entertain the possibility that she may be intelligent or be capable of succeeding in the national political sphere is a threat to their very worldview and sense of self. Hence we’re treated to portrayals of her as a nascent theocrat, even though she’s largely distanced her traditionalist outlook from the act of governance. We told about her “stunning ignorance”, even when her gaffes are dwarfed by her supposedly educated and sophisticated competitors. We’re told that she’s completely unqualified for national office, even when people less qualified are praised as outsiders.

  • Tennwriter

    Dalasio,
    A nicely subtle insight.

    Realpolitick,
    No, I’m quite serious, but then you knew that already. In another thread, you take me to task for saying Reagan won the Cold War. Its a non-controversial statement, RP. There are, of course, all sorts of caveats (Personal Computers, Maggie Thatcher, Pope John Paul, Gorbachev, the fact that by the seventies the Soviet elite did not believe any more, Jihadis in Afghanistan who were supplied with shoulder launched rockets by Jimmy Carter…), but boiled down to its simplest….Reagan won the Cold War.

    Palin Will Lose,
    There are studies that purport to show that better looking people get paid more. And most of US Presidents have been the taller guy (John Kerry was an exception, but he war freakishly tall.). The notion that being more attractive makes getting things done, gettting your way, and so on, easier is hardly controversial.

    I think a variant on this was one of Obama’s selling points. He was supposed to be this great talker who with his personal charm would get the world to like us. And frankly, he does come across as a very charming man to most people.

    Charm and personal attractiveness are not the exact same thing, but close enough for this arguement. Besides, Palin has plenty of charm as well. If you want someone who is more attractive than charming, you can go to Mitt Romney who looks like Superman: The Middle Years, and while he has charm, he doesn’t have quite as much as looks.

    Guys, really, I’m not saying anything that is not obvious.

  • CoolCzech

    Nobody is terrified of Palin…

    Posted by Palin_will_lose
    2009-11-28 00:08:39

    No, you’re just obessed over her. Which is rather odd, because I doubt you know much more about her specific stands on issue than I do: which, really, isn’t much.

  • CoolCzech

    She’sObama is so completely unqualified it’s scary how much it shows.
    Posted by Jack Schite
    2009-11-28 09:39:40

    Fixed that for you.

  • CoolCzech

    All in all, what we see is a politician that, while not superman, has every reason to be taken seriously as part of the political process and is certainly not a bogeyman in any meaningful sense.

    Exactly.

    I t beats me why the liberals feel the urge do denigrate and demonize her so much, really. She governed as a moderate. She never addressed illegal immigration straight up, and I suspect she’s for legalizing those already here. Nothing she has ever said about anything makes her out to be a firebreathing hardocre religious rightist, even if the lefts loves to point to her comments that we should pray that our troops are on a mission from God (an echo of Lincoln’s Second Inaugural, that stated we should hope that we are on God’s side).

    Again, what leaves me a little puzzled is how outright and severe the Left’s hate & obession with her is. I can only assume that they look at her and see someone that stands a very, very serious chance of winning the WH one day.

    And in case anyone is wondering if she indeed would like to be President, I would suggest her book tour looks an AWFUL LOT like a campaign tour.

  • whats_up

    And in case anyone is wondering if she indeed would like to be President, I would suggest her book tour looks an AWFUL LOT like a campaign tour.

    Posted by CoolCzech
    2009-11-30 10:03:27

    But she is not running for anything remember!!

  • Bill_Dalasio

    Posted by CoolCzech
    2009-11-30 10:03:27

    Again, what leaves me a little puzzled is how outright and severe the Left’s hate & obession with her is.

    As I suggested, it’s really not that puzzling. People are generally viscerally hostile to those who threaten their sense of themselves and their worth. Much moreso than with people they simply have a disageement with on an intellectual level. And liberals largely buy into the portion of the culture that define themselves as unusually intelligent and sophisticated. They generally use the petit bourgeiosie, or lower middle class, as the baseline for their presumption of superiority. Ms. Palin very directly reflects the sensibilities and worldview of the petit bourgeiosie. As a result, they have to both believe that she is intellectually and culturally inferior and see that cultural and intellectual inferior defeated, or the basis for their worldview is undermined.

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info